ELD-X vs SST vs ELD-M vs A-Max

User00033

Well-Known Member
ELD-X vs SST vs ELD-M vs A-Max.webp

For the nth time I got into a debate about the differences between the aforementioned Hornady bullets recently, with shooters at the local NZDA.

There’s still a lot of scepticism out there about what replaced what, some justified, some not so much. Most of what follows many of you already know, but if this helps someone make the right call on buying the right bullet for their intended quarry, then great. The picture is a to-scale representation of the four bullets in .30cal.

In terms of straight replacement, the .30 cal ELD-M is the new A-Max. There is, however, an important distinction, and that is the material the tip is made of, which we are told doesn’t deform in flight due to the extreme temperatures generated through friction. This accounts for the slight increase in BC. In 6.5mm and 7mm, the heaviest ELD-Ms are a lot heavier and longer than the heaviest A-Max in each calibre, this is where the largest increases in BC are seen in the ELD-M range over what went before.

Terminal performance of the ELD-M is the same as the A-Max. It is a soft, highly frangible bullet best suited in my opinion to proper medium to long range shooting, 300m to however far your rifle will shoot above 1600fps, as it will readily expand and fragment at lower velocities. Lots of guys use(d) A-Max across all hunting ranges, I have used them very effectively in .308 in the past. I know a couple of Youtube personalities here in NZ that use ELD-M over ELD-X in their rifles (e.g. 6.5x47, .260 Rem) for medium range deer, very successfully on the basins of the Southern Alps. Some though will prefer a slightly tougher bullet to ensure adequate penetration, particularly when striking the scapula or humerus bones. I have lower neck shot red hinds at 100-150m with A-Max and not had an exit wound, the bullet vaporises on the spine like the ProHunter in .243 does. Sure does kills them instantly. There are reports of bullet blow up and poor penetration with the A-Max when shoulder shooting heavy stags at close range, in fast calibres such as .270 Win, and certainly the magnums. I've never seen this happen though.

That the price of ELD-Ms seems to have shot up compared to the equivalent A-Max, well that’s somewhat annoying, especially when comparing the same weights. But it is what it is.

Onto the ELD-X, and Sierra ProHunters.

There have been some claims that the ELD-X is simply a higher BC replacement for the SST. Nathan Foster said that in his book, and I think he’s wrong and have pointed that out to him, which was a fun debate! Nathan is well respected and rightly so, but a few details in his books on the website knowledgebase aren’t correct IMO, or are heavily skewed towards proper long range hunting, but what’s great is that he’ll freely debate it with you.

(I had a good debate with him a couple of weeks ago, tackling his claim that the Sierra ProHunter and GameKing spitzers are manufactured to different designs, to be controlled expansion vs frangible. This hasn’t been my experience of these bullets at all, so I wrote to Sierra and asked. The ballistics tech wrote back with an excellent, detailed response, and I was correct, the spitzers are the exact same bullet, manufactured from the same materials to the same design, but for the boat tail on the GameKing. One thing about Nathan, he sure is deep into the physics of terminal performance.)

The main point of me posting this then is to suggest that IMO the ELD-X is not simply a longer SST. It is a quite different bullet, and having used it now for a year in .30 cal and 6.5mm and shot a lot of goats (couple of hundred), two dozen or so deer and several medium to large pigs, I can say that it performs a lot more reliably and less “messily” than the SST.

The cannelure in the SST never did much to hold the bullet together in my experience, especially at shorter ranges. The low position of the Interlock left a lot more bullet to fragment, the thin jacket down to the lock readily broke up. What I experienced many times with the SST in .308, was a large and very messy exit, caused by larger fragments bursting through in a wide wound radius.

The picture clearly shows how much thicker the ELD-X jacket is from the ogive through to the shank, how much higher up the mechanical lock is, and how much longer the stronger part of the bullet is for the weight. With this bullet, which I should say now I haven’t been using much at short range, I get a much more palatable exit wound but no less internal wounding, because (I assume) the high position of the lock means that the upper half of the bullet expands and partially fragments into very small pieces which produce extremely fast kills, whilst the lower half of the bullet remains largely intact and punches through.

With the SST, most of the bullet was fragmenting and overall weight loss was often very high. What was very noticeable when I switched from SST to the 150gr GameKing, was whilst the GameKing was highly frangible, it didn’t seem to generate as many larger fragments and therefore if there was an exit (about half the time?), it was quite small in comparison and the meat damage on the opposite side was much reduced.

So in my experience the commonly held view that the ELD-X “grenades” like the SST isn’t necessarily true. Some of the opinion to the contrary comes from parroting Nathan Foster’s book, where he talks about getting the ELD-X to blow up at short ranges, however he is very clear that this is in magnum cartridges at impact velocities above 2900fps. In slower, less powerful cartridges that are typically generating an MV of 2600-2800fps, I haven’t seen this outcome, nor have my mates that use this bullet.

I think that in most non-magnum cartridges the Hornady claim that the ELD-X is an “all-range” hunting bullet is a fair call. Exceptions where problems may occur at short range are the likes of .270, 6.5x284, i.e. cartridges than generate MVs of ~3000fps+. I have seen pictures from a friend who shot red hinds at 60-70m with the .270 Win and hot loaded 145gr ELD-X, and it wasn’t pretty at all.

In my .308, at a relatively sedate 2400fps, I haven’t had any problems, quite the opposite, the 178gr ELD-X poleaxes large hinds at shortish range, generating a sensible 1 – 1.5” exit wound and relatively little meat damage.

I think this comment though brings into play the issue of whether to choose ELD-X. Because for most blokes stalking in the woods or small fields, where ranges rarely exceed 250-300m, there are no material benefits to using the ELD-X over a traditional cup and core soft point like Sierra Gameking. I use ELD-X in my 6.5mm for longer range, high BC performance, but I am likely to drop them in my .308 in favour of the ProHunter spitzer or maybe round nose, because I’ll very rarely exceed 200m with that rifle now.

With the ProHunters, the reason I will likely pick them over the ELD-X for my woods gun is I can push them at a modest velocity and know I’ll get reliable fragmentation and a very high percentage of the energy dumped internally across a wide radius, usually all of the energy. I deliberately load the ProHunter to not readily exit the chest cavity. This has in my experience delivered a higher percentage of bang flops and short runners when the point of impact is slightly off. With the soft frangible bullet in the woods, where long runners are a potential big problem, you want it to do all its work internally and not in the countryside on the other side of the animal. Not surprisingly the animal dies a lot faster. Where the ProHunter comes up a bit short is when it's breezy, I've learnt to only ever take long shots with them when it is absolutely still.

For me then, the ELD-X is pretty much the perfect bullet for say 200-600m deer and goat shooting, or whatever range your rifle delivers a terminal velocity of say 2600-1800fps. The accuracy is the main differentiating factor, it is as claimed “match accurate” and sure does cheat the wind very effectively. In 6.5mm its the most reliably accurate hunting bullet that performs like a hunting bullet should that I've ever used (a dig at Berger VLD-H there). The construction and hard hitting terminals have - for me and my primary hunting partner - delivered effective, fast killing wounding at impact points pretty much anywhere from the front of the chest to just in front of the liver.

It does pay I think to understand how it works, it is not just an SST in new flash clothing.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for that. Had the same experience with the SST's in 308, thought they were more explosive than A-Max, at least 165 SST vs 168 A-Max. One should also match the shot placement with the bullet being used. Head neck shots with a very explosive bullet, side on chest keep clear of leg bone with a rapidly expanding bullet and avoid angled shoulder shot. Tough bullet go through the shoulder avoid neck shots etc.
Every now and then even that goes wrong, had a 150gr Fed Fusion bullet blow up on a slightly quartering to shoulder shot Sika hind. Normally those bullets behaved very well.
edi
 
Very nicely put Dodgyknees. Thanks for sharing. I doubt there are many on SD who have shot as many beasts with ELD-X as you have so your experience is very valuable.

I use ProHunter as my short range bullet in 6mm Lapua. MV is 2910 fps and shots tend to be from 50 meters to 200 meters. At the shorter end of the range I always get an exit on Muntjac, Roe and Fallow, at the longer end of the scale sometimes not. I shot a Roe buck last week front on through the chest and there was no exit at all.

As a long range bullet I use ABLR, 129 grain in the 6.5 Lapua, 150 grain and 168 grain in the 7mm's. I choose them because the high BC minimises wind drift and retained energy is much higher down range - the 6.5 carrying as much energy as a 270 win with the traditional 130 grain Norma bullets at 300 meters. It just makes the most of the chambering.

I have steered away from ELD-X until there was a bit more data available on terminal performance. I was never keen on the A-Max as if you did need to take a close range shot the mess was unacceptable. I have always hated the terminal performance of the SST for the same reason. The ELD-X are longer than the ABLR's which brings with it stability questions, but I might now give them a try.

Thanks for sharing. Nigel
 
I've not shot anywhere near as many as you but I find the new eld-m slightly tougher than the old amax ? difficult to quantify but seems it in my experience ?
 
I’ve only shot a handful of ELD-Ms, and I don’t think any were aimed at animals. So can’t comment I’m afraid. When I got my Creedmoor I went straight onto ELD-X and liked them so much I went for them in .308 as well.

A further comment on the .308, when I first used the 178gr ELD-X I was really surprised how much more felt recoil there was over the 150gr BTs and GKs I’d been using, and the 155gr A-Max. Like it felt way more that the modest 15% bullet weight increase. Wife thought so too. Never really understood why. Maybe we were just imagining it.
 
Thats nice info , for me I used a 6mm sst once turned in the body and turned the roe into dog food at best, then I moved to the pro hunter bullet it was my go bullet in any rifle very good and performed well, now its the eld x in 7mm very happy to shoot it at any size deer with good results ,I don't drive mine fast so 162gr just slow and heavy do's it for me
 
Last edited:
With most of these the bullet's weight/calibre can significantly impact terminal performance compared with the same bullet in a lower weight/smaller calibre.

.224 50gr AMax for example work almost like VMax in a wide range of shot placement and terminal velocities
208gr Amax however acts like a standard expanding cup and core with excellent retention

march construction to bullet weight to quarry size and shot placement and you can get very different results from any of them
 
Hi DN,

I remember reading that Nathan Foster said the ELDX behaved like an annealed SST. Basically the annealed SST jacket would fold back more readily during impact, creating less frontal area and increasing penetration. Not sure if this marries up with your observations?

I’ve got some 178 ELDMs to try in my 308, and 162 ELDX/180 ELDMs to try in my 7RM. Not loaded any up yet tho.

That’s interesting re the pro hunter vs GK. Nathan also states that Tipped Match King is the same jacket/construction as the the GK. Maybe you could verify this with your contact?

Also what was your poor experience with Berger? I use the 168s in my 7 so always interested to hear others experience.
 
I’ve never paid much attention to the annealing thing, its always been categorised as “should not be necessary”. I remember watching a video about it but that’s as far as it went. So can’t really comment on that.

For me, the .30 cal 178gr ELD-X / 180gr SST comparison is all about the thicker jacket and shank, and the higher position of the interlock on the ELD-X, which has translated to an improved balance of upper fragmentation and lower weight retention. I found the 180gr SST in my .308 to be a bit iffy at close range despite the increase in SD over the 150gr Gameking, I wasn’t convinced that the 180gr SST had the right balance of penetration and fragmentation. It seemed to break up into quite large bits and create a wide radius of pentration that often resulted in a massive hole on the offside of the animal. Whereas the Gameking being properly frangible dumped all its energy inside the animal and often wouldn’t even exit. So somewhat counterintuitively, the reduction in SD going from the SST to the Gameking improved killing performance in the sense that the animal was still very dead very quickly, but in much better condition after the fact.

In 6.5mm, I have zero direct experience of the 140gr SST to compare to the 143gr ELD-X, only comments and gory photos from my primary hunting buddy who used them in his (hot loaded) Swede for a couple of years. He is the guy who I followed into 6.5 Creedmoor / ELD-X. At the time last year, when we were umming and arrring about the effective range of the Creedmoor compared to the kind of country we’d be shooting, the question of which projectile was all about the balance of weight retention vs fragmentation. We are right in the “mid range” window performance wise, i.e. you need to ensure the bullet will do both jobs well at 2300-2000fps on a soft animal. It must penetrate properly and partially fragment, if it hits bone it must push through without vapourising, and it must not blow a 6” hole in the flank. When we tried the ELD-X at 400-600m on goats, it just delivered, no question, exactly what we wanted.

The TMK question is one anyone can ask, I just write in using to the techs at Sierra using the email on the website. Phillip Mahim is the fella I’ve been in contact with in the past. Very responsive, informative.

As for Bergers I’ll send you a pm.
 
The only experience I have of TMK is in 69 grain 224 which I use in a 22BR at 3350 fps on foxes. At that weight they behave very much like my old 6mm 70 grain BK and make a proper mess of a Fox. Not sure they would be on my list of things to try on a deer unless it was at very long range with a TV below 2000 fps in something like 162 grain 7mm.
 
Many thanks for this - very interesting. Could I ask what load you used for the ELD-X in .308?

I use two powders, AR2206H and AR2208, which are H4895 and Varget in the UK, so probably not much use to you I’m afraid. Both are loaded at one increment below book max.

Had an interesting but not exactly revelatory email back from Hornady overnight, I asked some questions around the genesis of ELD-X and the relationship with the SST.

Bottom line, there is no relationship. Totally different bullet. “ELD-X bullets are a new design for long distance, low velocity impacts as we have designed them specifically to expand at lower velocities.” Goes on to talk about doppler radar, updated polymer tip blah blah blah...

Then the bit anyone who has used SST knows all about... “The SST was designed to rapidly expand and do a lot of terminal damage to game within traditional hunting ranges.” By “traditional” I assume he means 400m or so.

So it follows that touting the ELD-X as simply a “high bc SST” is indeed not the case. Interesting how the interweb can generate fact from fiction and I am surprised how this view was supported or maybe even created by some notable writers on the subject. For at least 2 years on pretty much all hunting forums there has been a lot of scepticism towards Hornady over the new ELD bullets, a lot related to the price increases of ELD-M over A-Max. (How much of that is importer related and how much is wholesale Hornady pricing, I have no idea.) But also all over the world you’ll hear the commonly held view that the ELD-X is just an SST with a new polymer tip.

The email from Hornady went on to say ..”as long as you’re wearing appropriate camouflage, your tactical beard is in good order and your scope weighs a minimum 2kg, the ELD-X will suit your requirements down to the ground and you will hit anthing you point it at between here and the moon. If you are an old traditionalist fart with a Sherlock hat, polished walnut 7x57 Mauser and a 4x42 scope, stick to your round nosed Speers and be grateful you can still see a deer at a hundred yards, ELD-X is designed not to fit in your magazine for a reason!”
 
I opened this thread to read a few days ago but am only now getting round to reading it as it is a bit long but thats not a bad thing, it is a very good and detailed experience of the OP and i have had similar experience with the eld-x in that they don't do any more damage then any other bullets at medium-long range however, i have seen them blow up at close range in the faster calibres but tbh at the sort of ranges this applies to you really should be head/neck shooting, and i appreciate that those shots dont always present them selves in which case you should probably find a way to make that kind of shot or accept the damage they deal. and i appreciate that not all people agree with head/neck shooting, in which case either back off the distance a bit or pick another bullet as the eld-x is probably not be the bullet for you, alternatively you could load them a bit slower as im sure most people do. but i have always believed that if you are not going to load a calibre to its max capabilities (accuracy dependent of course) then you may as well get a smaller calibre.
Alternatively again you could go to a heavier bullet (twist rate dependent ofc) that is then slower while being near the max.
 
The email from Hornady went on to say ..”as long as you’re wearing appropriate camouflage, your tactical beard is in good order and your scope weighs a minimum 2kg, the ELD-X will suit your requirements down to the ground and you will hit anthing you point it at between here and the moon. If you are an old traditionalist fart with a Sherlock hat, polished walnut 7x57 Mauser and a 4x42 scope, stick to your round nosed Speers and be grateful you can still see a deer at a hundred yards, ELD-X is designed not to fit in your magazine for a reason!”

Very good Dodgy :rofl:
 
Some evidence of performance... 143gr ELD-X, small female goat, range 368m. I dug the bullet out the bank behind the point of impact. Exit wound is about 25mm. Goat died immediately.

Interesting to note that the copper jacket has peeled back to the interlock ring, but that the remaining lead core is missing. This was the same with the other two bullets I’ve managed to recover. I think they pop out at the last minute, I read something somewhere about the suction effect as they rebound at zero velocity. I probably should have dug around a bit more but it was getting dark, and it was starting rain.

29 goats in two sessions around the weather today, shortest range was 140m, furthest 570m. Really starting to get the hang of the wind holds for this bullet - its not a lot, certainly not as much as I’m used to with .308. Smacking freshly orphaned goat kids face on at well over 400m in a 8-9m/s gusty crosswind is a very satisfying job well done, it is a job remember, this is proper pest control, got to do the right thing and not leave them.

yJtS5d.jpg


R8Vppg.jpg


pLbEkz.jpg


IUk4Zk.jpg


TSOLWh.jpg
 
With my 6.5 Grendel, shot a 20kg male Kangaroo with a 123 ELD-Match at 80 metres. Acted like a grenade. Demonstrably effective.
 
Hi Dodgyknees, interesting post.

I have the Hornady app on my phone and for what it is worth thought I post "advertised" muzzle velocity ranges.

30 Cal, in fps

178gr ELD-X : 2000-3100
180gr SST : 2400-3400

178gr ELD-M : 2200-3400
178gr A-Max : 2200-3400

So, presumably, the SST is designed to be driven a bit harder than the ELD-X

Best wishes,

Scrummy
 
Back
Top