Perhaps he was on his way to settle a dispute,
running a red?, I think he took a bit of a chance, disagreeing with the officer's version for the traffic stop.
Probably the safest semi to carry loaded - I have seen them dropped by slightly excited competition shooters with no issues (apart from the abuse hurled by fellow competitors of course).i had a glock before they were unjustly banned , the trigger has a small catch on the front of the trigger that wont allow rearward movement of the trigger unless directly pulled by the trigger finger and on top of that the striker is not fully cocked the trigger moves some distance which finishes the cocking before firing , a bit like a cross between single and double action , this makes the glock a very safe pistol to carry loaded and also it requires deliberate action on the part of the person holding it to fire the gun.
It’s called Condition one….and how do you know the safety wasn’t on before the officer started fumbling?Is that because if we did, you’re concerned that you might be stupid enough to carry a hand gun loaded, with a full chamber and the safety off?
No it's not. Every pull is the same with Glock (of course you don't need full pull if you reset correctly instead of slapping trigger, but the weight is the same). And it's not particularly heavy for a pistol, especially not for service pistol.Probably the safest semi to carry loaded - I have seen them dropped by slightly excited competition shooters with no issues (apart from the abuse hurled by fellow competitors of course).
Inbuilt safety of trigger and little lever system aside the first pull of the trigger is very heavy; let the trigger go forward partially (under control) and the next pull is very light by comparison to the first.
………Somewhat ironic that “gun handling” is being criticised here, and done so from such a ignorant position…
I don’t but it seems beyond doubt that there was a round in the chamber. Am I to suppose that the officer also loaded that while fumbling?It’s called Condition one….and how do you know the safety wasn’t on before the officer started fumbling?
Ken.
i'm certainly not an expert , it was a lot of years ago now and it would seem reading true experts replies that a lot has changed !Lots of glock experts have explained the technicalities, I just see a dappy tart put her finger on the trigger like an eejit.
Oh I have NO idea, my experience with pistols is putting a few rounds through a browning HP 30 odd years ago!i'm certainly not an expert , it was a lot of years ago now and it would seem reading true experts replies that a lot has changed !
there was literally next to bugger all upgrades available when i had my gen1 glock 17 , sounds like that has changed ?
Whether there was either one up the spout or the safety was on/off is immaterial. The Police Officer had absolutely no cause or right to be anywhere near the gun.I don’t but it seems beyond doubt that there was a round in the chamber. Am I to suppose that the officer also loaded that while fumbling?
Even more so if you live in South Africa…Believe it or not - many of the US self defence classes tell you there is no point carrying if there isn’t one in the spout….
But the lack of safety is not recommended…
That’s why it’s called (Or it used to be, back in the day) Condition one.I don’t but it seems beyond doubt that there was a round in the chamber. Am I to suppose that the officer also loaded that while fumbling?
That’s why it’s called (Or it used to be, back in the day) Condition one.
I think the Brit. Army were still using revolvers when I started hand gunning, yeh, I am that old!Or, “Made Ready” in British parlance…