I find it baffling when it’s announced that it’s hard for women to get into stalking. Fieldsports Britain announce it on a regular basis. It’s an oft repeated rhetoric.
It’s hard for anyone to get into stalking! No one is waiting with permissions poised ready, waiting, for anyone.
My experience of women in shooting sports is that they are welcomed with open arms. I run a game shoot and have a lady gun, and several beaters and pickers up and I can say with a clear conscience they have been made very welcome from day one. Judging by the actions of BASC etc I think women are afforded much better opportunities at an earlier stage in their ‘shooting career’ than most men.
It's not hard for anyone to get into stalking, male or female.
What is difficult for women is working their way up through the ranks once they've started, particularly if they want to do it professionally. There is a general assumption (as seen in a few comments on here) that they won't be capable, or strong enough, or too squeamish, or whatever, and it's a real struggle for them to shake off this prejudice.
They prove time and time again that they're just as capable as their male counterparts, if not more so. Yet still the prejudice persists, making it harder for them to gain employment in the sector (or simply to be taken seriously, if stalking recreationally).
And then there's the whole risk factor, perceived or otherwise, associated with going on (or, later in career, guiding on) paid stalks. There are a lot of lady stalkers who start out but make little progress due to the - understandable - fear of having to meet up, alone, in the middle of nowhere, in the dark, with an unknown bloke with a rifle. You say they're welcomed "with open arms". Perhaps that's exactly what they're afraid of? Same applies to doing DSC2 witnessed stalks. Which is one of the reasons why Mouse is now an AW - so women who want to take DSC2 can have a female witness if that makes them more comfortable.