GWCT set record straight again

What an excellent rebuttal: really heartening to see robust, data- and science-supported work like this.
I have donated via their website: we need this sort of work to continue
 
Interesting the people that won't accept the GWCT research on non-lead ammunition that the BASC bloke posts, but are straight on board when the GWCT come out with something like this, donating and posting on here how great it is.
 
Interesting the people that won't accept the GWCT research on non-lead ammunition that the BASC bloke posts, but are straight on board when the GWCT come out with something like this, donating and posting on here how great it is.
I also support BASC as do many others on here, your statement assumes that those supporting this cannot possibly support both.
 
I also support BASC as do many others on here, your statement assumes that those supporting this cannot possibly support both.

Supporting research by the GWCT suggests you trust the source. Disregarding it on another issue suggests you do not.

I just said it was interesting how people pick and choose what they choose to believe.
 
Well done GWCT. We are bashed all the time from all sides, but it is impossible to argue with science. If only the three "independent" authors followed science instead of their agenda !
 
Back
Top