Hawke vantage 30 wa 4-16-50 v airmax compact 4-16-44 with n/v add on's

[Warbucks]

Anyone got and experience with the above scopes using n/v add on mainly the Pard 007 ?
The Vantage i believe has 11 coatings and the airmax 16, ok in my example one has a 50mm front end as against a 44mm, but over the year of using mtc scopes i didn't find and n/v performance difference with this.
Which one of these's two do you think would work best with the Pard 007.
They do the vantage with a subsonic .22lr reticule, would this be a big advantage over the AMX reticule on the airmax.

Thanks Dave (warbucks)

 

[Corvid]

No experience of the airmax but used a 007 and the vantage you mention on my 243 and they worked very well

 

[HallyButt]

I’ve had airmax and vantage on rimfires. Air max fell to bits, none of vantage have.

if you can find the extra cash, sidewinder is streets ahead

 

[Warbucks]

I’ve had airmax and vantage on rimfires. Air max fell to bits, none of vantage have.

if you can find the extra cash, sidewinder is streets ahead

I already have the 4-16x50 sidewinder so i'll give that a go.

Thanks everyone for your advice.

Dave (warbucks)

 

[User00036]

The reticule system on the Vantage .22 is accurate only on 12x mag, not many NV add ons are usable on this setting. Set the rifle to 5o yds with the scope, & learn holdover & range estimation. For daytime use it is fabulous bit of kit, you still need to estimate range, a bunny at 50 yds seems very close.
BTW if using on 4x mag, the scope fires high at 75yds. 50 yds is always a constant. Get one & put 50 rounds through it at various ranges & the mag you use with your NV, you'l soon get the hang.