Jamming Drones

That's not true either.
You cannot fly drones over land that does not belong to you without permissionI, is a civil matter of tresspass.

No one has brought it to court 'yet' ...
Unless there is a no fly zone the air space belongs to no one , so if launched from public ground you are well within your rights, dependent on the height of course
 
Last edited:
Unless there is a no fly zone the air space belongs to no one , so if launched from public ground you are well within your rights, dependent on the height of course
Not so if the ‘public ground’ is owned by His Majesty’s Government - in which case you need permission, public liability insurance etc.
 
any under 16's in the group with a catapult?
It was within catapult range. Just hovering there over our shoulders for twenty odd minutes buzzing away. The operator started with it high and got lower progressively until he found the optimal point of annoyance. My lad was there, coming up to eight, I will get him in training With the catapult.
 
It was within catapult range. Just hovering there over our shoulders for twenty odd minutes buzzing away. The operator started with it high and got lower progressively until he found the optimal point of annoyance. My lad was there, coming up to eight, I will get him in training With the catapult.
Get photos and video of the drone. Along with the operator. They are legally required to be in line of sight.
Once you have evidence of the misuse forward it to the CAA. They might not act at first but if you and others keep getting the evidence. They may well do something about it. Some of the aviation laws are quite penalty heavy.
The trouble is if you damage the drone the aforementioned aircraft laws can bite you instead.
 
Catapult with 'shot' in the pouch, it's one of the very few times I use a 'flick' action
 
There might also be something in the privacy legislation as in you cannot take photos or video of people without their knowledge or consent. Hence need for signs when using CCTV cameras etc.

Even more so when many who hunt, shoot and fish are pretty high profile types of individuals.

However I am sure that pheasants frequently fly very close to drones, shame some of the guns are not that good a shot and to be honest they are pretty hard to see so the gun could be forgiven for hitting it.
 
There might also be something in the privacy legislation as in you cannot take photos or video of people without their knowledge or consent. Hence need for signs when using CCTV cameras etc.

Even more so when many who hunt, shoot and fish are pretty high profile types of individuals.

However I am sure that pheasants frequently fly very close to drones, shame some of the guns are not that good a shot and to be honest they are pretty hard to see so the gun could be forgiven for hitting it.
Not true I am afraid you can’t stop people taking photos in/from a public space. Nobody owns the airspace above their property.
The signs for CCTV are related to data protection laws. I have to provide on request footage of “Joe Bloggs” (I can charge £10 to find it) and provide him with it. He can’t actually stop me filming it in the first place.
Thought just occurred to me, there’s your other tactic. Data protection requests from everyone there. For footage of themselves. Tie the buggers up with that, how many at the meet? Even if you had to pay the tenner. How much time does it take to go through the footage and find each person.
You can report them if they don’t comply. Sometimes the petty BS makes something not worth doing.
 
It was within catapult range. Just hovering there over our shoulders for twenty odd minutes buzzing away. The operator started with it high and got lower progressively until he found the optimal point of annoyance. My lad was there, coming up to eight, I will get him in training With the catapult.
Illegal to fly a drone within 50m of people so unless you have a long range catapult I'd say they're breaking the law!
 
People are broad brushing this flying within 50m of not people being allowed.

It depends on the drone.
Wonder if you are getting confused with the need for Flyer and/or Operator ID which is based on type/weight/camera etc.?

Seems pretty black & white to me as far as no flying within 50m with no reference to type of drone - CAA source document here:


Extract from source document:

View attachment 331348
 
Last edited:
It says on the next page thats cut off in your screenshot.
Yep, you're right - 'my bad'!

But how much does the drone weigh? - 249g in basic form but more with an intelligent battery maybe?

Only trying to help the OP identify whether there is any recourse next time it happens, will keep my thoughts to myself in future!
 
Yep, you're right - 'my bad'!

But how much does the drone weigh? - 249g in basic form but more with an intelligent battery maybe?

Only trying to help the OP identify whether there is any recourse next time it happens, will keep my thoughts to myself in future!

Nah, no worries, just seen a few people believing it was the rule.

250g doesnt sound much but then you look at the 249g drones and theyre pretty sizeable.

They could have a 500g with a cert or they could just be going rogue, who knows.
 
Back
Top