Lead ammunition restrictions - government announcement

Status
Not open for further replies.
Is it correct that eg .22lr will be exempt?

If someone knows factually either way that would be helpful to know.

Thanks
ES
 
The Government has announced plans to implement restrictions on the sale and use of lead ammunition in England, Scotland and Wales.

Today’s announcement confirms that the Government plans to introduce legislation to restrict lead ammunition by summer 2026, with a further three-year transition period running until 2029.

BASC response to announcement:


Guardian article with quotes from BASC, CA and others:

You made your bed, this is your doing thinking you were cleaver!

Reap what you sow.
 
Is it correct that eg .22lr will be exempt?

If someone knows factually either way that would be helpful to know.

Thanks
ES
The Government has today (Thursday 10 July) announced that legislation will be introduced to restrict the use of lead in ammunition in England, Scotland and Wales.

The proposals include:

• A ban on shot containing more than one per cent lead;

• A ban on bullets with more than three per cent lead;

• A three-year transition period for most outdoor shooting, with two years for ranges to introduce pollution controls.

Exemptions will include airguns, small-calibre bullets for live quarry and managed outdoor ranges.

BASC has long advocated for a phased transition away from lead shot for live quarry shooting, backed by evidence and support for shooters. We recognise this is a major step and will continue working to ensure the transition is practical, proportionate and supported by supply chains and clear guidance.

Read the BASC statement here

Key points

• Lead shot will still be permitted for some target shooting uses under specific conditions.

• Airgun pellets and small-calibre bullets used for live quarry shooting will remain outside the scope of the ban.

• The full ban is expected to come into effect by summer 2029, following a three-year transition period beginning in 2026.

• We will provide further details as the legislative process unfolds and continue engaging with Defra to represent the interests of the shooting community at every stage.

If you have any questions or concerns, please get in touch. You can also visit our website for updates, advice and guidance.

(Source: BASC Fast Track)
 
BASC has long advocated for a phased transition away from lead shot for live quarry shooting, backed by evidence and support for shooters. We recognise this is a major step and will continue working to ensure the transition is practical, proportionate and supported by supply chains and clear guidance.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
 
Small cal up to and including 6mm? Where are the facts
did a google search for the government / DEFRA announcements but failed to find anything other than what’s in the media no official document, guess BASC etc knew about this for a few days and today it was made public.
 
What exactly is the problem with the 243 and other small calibres such as the 223 with non lead bullets.

The only issue with the 243 was the 100gn min bullet weight that used to be the case in Scotland. This was reduced to 80gn a while ago. There are plenty of options available that meet the legal minimum energy requirements, especially that most 80gn loads have more energy than 100gn loads.

Yes I suppose if you have chosen to shorten your barrel to 16” and compensated with a faster burning powder then you might struggle to meet min energy requirements with any 80gn load whether its lead or copper.
 
What exactly is the problem with the 243 and other small calibres such as the 223 with non lead bullets.

The only issue with the 243 was the 100gn min bullet weight that used to be the case in Scotland. This was reduced to 80gn a while ago. There are plenty of options available that meet the legal minimum energy requirements, especially that most 80gn loads have more energy than 100gn loads.

Yes I suppose if you have chosen to shorten your barrel to 16” and compensated with a faster burning powder then you might struggle to meet min energy requirements with any 80gn load whether its lead or copper.

In my experience .243 is one of the superior non toxic cartridges. It’s a fast cartridge that can force monolithics to work well. Why people continue to spout nonsense about it and non toxic is beyond me, they should be more concerned by some of the slower cartridges.
 
The devil will be in the detail, especially for ranges requiring pollution control, managed ranges, that could be very expensive to implement.
Not really. On existing gallery ranges with sand butts every thing is already there.

If you don’t have sand traps, you will need to find a lorry load of sand and a digger for a couple of days and put some down.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top