Were Grahams able to provide your friend with any other information or history on their telescope?
Was taken in as a lens was loose and made a rattle. Upon return the remark was 'Where on Earth did you get that from?!'
I am genuinely intrigued about when, why and for whom it was manufactured for example. Was it a custom, one-off, private commission or part of a batch? A talking-point? An advertisement? A just-for-the-hell-of-it?
Supposedly made for the Falklands... probably a private comission that an officer asked for and had a few colleagues chip in for a batch to make the project worthwile.
Regardless of all, I think it a magnificent item and your friend is privileged indeed to own such a telescope.
Agreed in part, it's a nice curio for sure.
IMHO the Gray's telescope is not that well designed. Hardly bad, and with modern materials you would expect it to be better than an 1890's Ross of London Stalking scope, but it isn't in my eyes.
-No eyepiece shutter or front lens cap to protect outer lenses.
-From what I can tell, no air vent holes drilled into the main body (underneath the sunshade) to allow air to escape when the scope is extended or collapsed. This means you cannot pack it as tightly as a Ross of London scope, meaning it is more prone to water and dust incursion.
-Not designed to be end user servicable.
-Cases supplied with the Grays go from OK to poor, especially on the newest ones which are nearly not fit for purpose. The one with the above scope was OK, but not good.
From conversations with
@Freeforester , it seems Col. Milne (previous owner of Grahams of Inverness), production costs were a major factor so I suspect the compromises bled into the telescope design as well, see here :
Gray Telescope
I've been mulling over getting in touch with a Japanese firm to have some
proper three draw telescopes made, to Ross of London design, but with top tier modern glass lenses which can be cleaned internally by the user.
However,with the leather case alone running into £400-500, I doubt any significant number of people would pay £3k for a three draw draw telescope, which by nature cannot be made water or fogproof, and takes a great deal of skill and practise to be used effectively, and can never exceed a tripod and angled spotter, which would cost the same or less...