National campaign launched to tackle firearm certificate fraud

It's not an alleged problem. There have been multiple instances of fake FAC's acquiring firearms. The only immediate solutions would create significant additional strain on already stretched resources.
I prefer to dump the whole transfers and payment issue on my local RFD and I'm more than happy to pay for the privilege.
 
If criminals can successfully forge a passport to the point that it can pass all the checks at an airport, what chance do the authorities have with an FAC?
 
If criminals can successfully forge a passport to the point that it can pass all the checks at an airport, what chance do the authorities have with an FAC?
My understanding is the forgeries are not done to a high standard and only need to be inspected by the man selling the firearm who have little idea what to look for. I think they are photoshop jobs. Next time I’m selling a firearm I’ll take along a uv torch a simple no brainer seems to me.
 
Where are these published/recorded? If there are so many you would think someone could cite a few….
Yeah, just like how GCHQ publish what they've thwarted. 🤣 Let the criminals know which ones they know about so they can work out how to improve their methods.
You don't need to be a mensa member to work out how easy this type of fraud is. Even RFD's don't check the status of an FAC with the police, there is no requirement to do so.
The current procedure of transfer is deeply flawed from a security perspective. Instances of fraud go back decades it amazes me it's not more frequent to be honest.
 
It's not an alleged problem. There have been multiple instances of fake FAC's acquiring firearms. The only immediate solutions would create significant additional strain on already stretched resources.
Using an uninformative americanism to describe a number which you state may be either as low as two instances every 56 years or as high as a million times a minute, doesn't do anything to enlighten.
The state's resources have never, in peacetime history, been less stretched. They consume unparalleled quantities of the nation's resources and perform increasingly ineptly. As to the extent of any strain, that is wholly the result of incompetent management and clinging to outdated practices.
 
Sometimes I think forums are mad. All this…. we must know how often it happens…. it’s a conspiracy…. the system is broken nonsense?! I mean if it happens once that’s a problem right?
I’m grateful that there has been a campaign to highlight the existing safety features in the certification and happy to use them if I sell some firearms in the future. It seems as simple as that…… all the rest is bunker mentality which I can’t be bothered with. Keep life simple I say.
 
Yeah, just like how GCHQ publish what they've thwarted. 🤣 Let the criminals know which ones they know about so they can work out how to improve their methods.
You don't need to be a mensa member to work out how easy this type of fraud is. Even RFD's don't check the status of an FAC with the police, there is no requirement to do so.
The current procedure of transfer is deeply flawed from a security perspective. Instances of fraud go back decades it amazes me it's not more frequent to be honest.
 
As has been mentioned before, a complete overhaul with credit card style licenses would be the best way to go.
QR code on the license, app on the phone, scan the code and enter the gun details. Data base updates automatically, nice and easy.
Also, if a driving licence or passport is good for 10 years then why not a firearm or shotgun ticket. Your health can deteriorate while you hold a driving licence and nobody has a meltdown about that, if something gets flagged up it gets addressed. How many people are running about who can’t read the number plate at 21 meters? But nobody is calling for eye tests every 5 years.
 
Sometimes I think forums are mad. All this…. we must know how often it happens…. it’s a conspiracy…. the system is broken nonsense?! I mean if it happens once that’s a problem right?
I’m grateful that there has been a campaign to highlight the existing safety features in the certification and happy to use them if I sell some firearms in the future. It seems as simple as that…… all the rest is bunker mentality which I can’t be bothered with. Keep life simple I say.
Nope…it’s about risk assessment, to know how high the risk is we need to know the probability of the occurrence, otherwise it’s wasted efforts that could be used elsewhere in a hugely flawed system.

And call me cynical but will be used as a rod for certain holders backs.
 
Again, call me cynical but …..convenient.

View attachment 402463
Surely you’d have been better asking the NCA to provide the figures that constitute the ‘surge’ they refer to. Or to ask Polis Scotland to provide you with the figures they provided the NCA. Either way this should be a quick & easy thing to do as they form the basis of the argument in the first place… cynical, moi, of course not 🤔
 
Surely you’d have been better asking the NCA to provide the figures that constitute the ‘surge’ they refer to. Or to ask Polis Scotland to provide you with the figures they provided the NCA. Either way this should be a quick & easy thing to do as they form the basis of the argument in the first place… cynical, moi, of course not 🤔
Both should lead to the same response. It should be data that was already defined and sorted - that’s why I’m not really buying it.

To say there is an issue they must’ve mined the data already.
 
Both should lead to the same response. It should be data that was already defined and sorted - that’s why I’m not really buying it.

To say there is an issue they must’ve mined the data already.
Try narrowing the question you ask, or redrafting it in such a way to make it more specific. it might be that it’s breadth that’s causing too many man hours to sift through data and provide an answer.
 
Try narrowing the question you ask, or redrafting it in such a way to make it more specific. it might be that it’s breadth that’s causing too many man hours to sift through data and provide an answer.
Och, I don’t think it’ll matter…it likely won’t make any difference to the outcome i’m afraid:
 
The person would have been guilty of illegal possession of a firearm, and also fraud.

Better to ask for cases of illegal possession where the conviction also included a charge of fraud.
 
So no actual numbers have been published because there is no way of knowing how many fraudulent transactions have taken place.From my way of looking at it this is someone looking at our system and now realizing how easy it would be to produce a counterfeit licence and using it to acquire from private individuals.But looking at the guns etc used in crime most of them are illegal hand guns so you don’t need a certificate.
Surely it is possible to tell. All transfers are notifiable. All legally bought from new and sold secondhand firearms are traceable. If you sell a firearm to someone with a fake certificate and the notify the plod as you must, they will surely work out (immediately or eventually) that the buyer had a fake certificate?
 
Back
Top