Peltor EEP 100 in-ear electronic plugs

Mine are in on the highseat and I can hear the traffic approx 300m away perfectly...along with pedestrian voices. Can't tell what they're saying as I'm not Superman but I know they're there 😁
 
Would these have more protection than over-ear muffs? I’m suffering with hearing damage (thanks for that, .270…) and am using my Peltor electronic ear defenders when stalking but am still finding I’ve got a ringing left ear after taking a shot.
 
They do a multi tip bag to get you started with finding the right size plugs:
You can also buy the cord separately, as it isn't included with the 100"s. I think it is worth having, so that if one gets knocked out you don't loose it:
 
Would these have more protection than over-ear muffs? I’m suffering with hearing damage (thanks for that, .270…) and am using my Peltor electronic ear defenders when stalking but am still finding I’ve got a ringing left ear after taking a shot.
Peltors highest rated passive over ears are the x5 which have up to 37db reduction. The eep are up to 38db depending on the tips fitted (can be as low as 32db with certain tips, but that’s still very good).

For reference, a set of Peltor Bullseye which you will find on any military range in the country will be about 26db.

Every 3db represents a doubling/halving of noise reduction.
 
Don’t make the mistake of believing/thinking they are suitable for range use. At best the occasional rifle shot when out stalking where any attenuation is better than none.

It’s a pity as I prefer a brimmed hat to baseball caps.

K

You must have different EEP-100's from me then my friend.

Mine are worn full-days coaching shotguns, clay pigeon events, double gun loading days through the seaon, simulated game days, range days with the rifle, load-development sessions, sometimes stalking (when I remember) and I have never once found fault with them. I have even used them in a tunnel range without issue.

If I remember correctly they have a higher attenuation level than most active overear defenders with the correct fitting ear pieces.
 
You must have different EEP-100's from me then my friend.

Mine are worn full-days coaching shotguns, clay pigeon events, double gun loading days through the seaon, simulated game days, range days with the rifle, load-development sessions, sometimes stalking (when I remember) and I have never once found fault with them. I have even used them in a tunnel range without issue.

If I remember correctly they have a higher attenuation level than most active overear defenders with the correct fitting ear pieces.
Perhaps I’ve just a different👂 canal than your good self.

If these work for you that’s great but if I’m at the range I’m gonna stick with my Peltor Com-Tacs.

K
 
For reference, a set of Peltor Bullseye which you will find on any military range in the country will be about 26db.
Surely our military are using better ones than that nowadays?
I was recently at the range with a chap who's just left the German army. He had his issue ear-defenders with him, and they were the every-effective Peltor Optime III, in a fetching olive-green colour.
 
Surely our military are using better ones than that nowadays?
I was recently at the range with a chap who's just left the German army. He had his issue ear-defenders with him, and they were the every-effective Peltor Optime III, in a fetching olive-green colour.
We were just starting to get some kind of electronic version as I was leaving, but inevitably the good new stuff is the first to get nicked and broken, so there will always be a few sets of passive cans and a box of yellow foam disposables!
 
Thanks for the feedback folks, looks like it's worth a go. I guess if I don't get on with them, at least the replaceable tips mean I can sell them on. Whereas I'll be stuck with my disappointing custom moulded filtered plugs forever!

Question:
Is there actually a difference between the orange ones (for "forestry and shooting" ) and the bright green (for "industry")
The stats look the same, I think, but I think the orange are slightly more expensive...
 
Last edited:
Just a wee update in case anyone is reading this and wondering if they should get a pair. I gave mine a decent test last week at the range. It was a breezy day and they did activate a bit with the wind noise, but nowhere near as intrusively as the mechanical valve type I had before. Comfortable enough to wear for the whole 3 hours or so, perfect for conversation and general awareness, and quiet enough that I was able to wear them in the shotgun pit with everything echoing around off sleeper walls, etc.
Very pleased 👍🏻
 
Don’t make the mistake of believing/thinking they are suitable for range use. At best the occasional rifle shot when out stalking where any attenuation is better than none.

It’s a pity as I prefer a brimmed hat to baseball caps.

K
Why do you think they are not suitable for the range?
 
Why do you think they are not suitable for the range?
For me it’s simply that they do not reduce noise by the same degree as muffs. However, I’ve since given this more thought in light of the db reduction figures being quoted and have concluded that what ear buds do not do is protect the bone around the ears (skull) from concussion. Something that is particularly noticeable in covered areas such as the BSRC “Statics” FP and the Running Deer hut.

Just my view but I’m not a Rocket Scientist.

K
 
For me it’s simply that they do not reduce noise by the same degree as muffs. However, I’ve since given this more thought in light of the db reduction figures being quoted and have concluded that what ear buds do not do is protect the bone around the ears (skull) from concussion. Something that is particularly noticeable in covered areas such as the BSRC “Statics” FP and the Running Deer hut.

Just my view but I’m not a Rocket Scientist.

K
Fair one, I have heard about the bones but being protected.

If I’m shooting next to someone in moderated at my tunnel club or next to a brake at bisley I do tend to double up with over ears over the LEPs now.
 
For me it’s simply that they do not reduce noise by the same degree as muffs. However, I’ve since given this more thought in light of the db reduction figures being quoted and have concluded that what ear buds do not do is protect the bone around the ears (skull) from concussion. Something that is particularly noticeable in covered areas such as the BSRC “Statics” FP and the Running Deer hut.

Just my view but I’m not a Rocket Scientist.

K
Which tips were you using? If you use suitable ones and insert them properly, they give significantly and measurably better noise reduction than over-ear hearing protection.

I've confirmed this myself using both calibrated test tones, and at an all-day long-range session. I brought EEP-100s with the large foam tips as well as MSR Sordin Supreme Pro-X with the gel pads for doubling up. With only the over-ear set, the isolation seemed a bit inadequate, whereas I felt no need to supplement the in-ear set with over-ear ones even beside a muzzle-braked .338 Lapua.

Just use the right tips and put them in right. These ones are extremely effective:

full_size_preview_3m-peltor-skull-screw-replacement-tips-370-1019-10.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Which tips were you using? If you use suitable ones and insert them properly, they give significantly and measurably better noise reduction than over-ear hearing protection.

I've confirmed this myself using both calibrated test tones, and at an all-day long-range session. I brought EEP-100s with the large foam tips as well as MSR Sordin Supreme Pro-X with the gel pads for doubling up. With only the over-ear set, the isolation seemed a bit inadequate, whereas I felt no need to supplement the in-ear set with over-ear ones even beside a muzzle-braked .338 Lapua.

Just use the right tips and put them in right. These ones are extremely effective:

full_size_preview_3m-peltor-skull-screw-replacement-tips-370-1019-10.png
They're the ones I use, very good once fitted properly 👍🏻

Mrs SimpleSimon had a go with them as well but she couldn't get those tips to fit and used some of the rubbery ones instead. Obviously I can't comment on how effective she found them, but she thought they were similar to her non-valved moulded plugs.
 
Back
Top