Dave Lakes
Well-Known Member
*highestSorry Klench but the figures disagree, even if you are just comparing within the Peltor range, the eep give some of the high heat level of attenuation out there
*highestSorry Klench but the figures disagree, even if you are just comparing within the Peltor range, the eep give some of the high heat level of attenuation out there
You can also buy the cord separately, as it isn't included with the 100"s. I think it is worth having, so that if one gets knocked out you don't loose it:They do a multi tip bag to get you started with finding the right size plugs:
![]()
Mino CENS Kit Bag - Puretone Shop
Contains a mix of sizes of replacement foam tips for your Mino CENS, along with 2 wax guards and 2 wax guard tools used for the wax guard replacement, and a brush for cleaning.www.puretone.net
www.best4safety.co.uk
Peltors highest rated passive over ears are the x5 which have up to 37db reduction. The eep are up to 38db depending on the tips fitted (can be as low as 32db with certain tips, but that’s still very good).Would these have more protection than over-ear muffs? I’m suffering with hearing damage (thanks for that, .270…) and am using my Peltor electronic ear defenders when stalking but am still finding I’ve got a ringing left ear after taking a shot.
Well maybe I’ve still yet to find the correct/best plug fit.Sorry Klench but the figures disagree, even if you are just comparing within the Peltor range, the eep give some of the high heat level of attenuation out there
Don’t make the mistake of believing/thinking they are suitable for range use. At best the occasional rifle shot when out stalking where any attenuation is better than none.
It’s a pity as I prefer a brimmed hat to baseball caps.
K
Perhaps I’ve just a differentYou must have different EEP-100's from me then my friend.
Mine are worn full-days coaching shotguns, clay pigeon events, double gun loading days through the seaon, simulated game days, range days with the rifle, load-development sessions, sometimes stalking (when I remember) and I have never once found fault with them. I have even used them in a tunnel range without issue.
If I remember correctly they have a higher attenuation level than most active overear defenders with the correct fitting ear pieces.
I thought I'd found the right plug but then tried a different size and much better sound suppressionWell maybe I’ve still yet to find the correct/best plug fit.
K
I think that’s crucial, even more so than with over ear ones because there is zero adjustment; they’re either in your lug or they’re not!Well maybe I’ve still yet to find the correct/best plug fit.
K
Surely our military are using better ones than that nowadays?For reference, a set of Peltor Bullseye which you will find on any military range in the country will be about 26db.
We were just starting to get some kind of electronic version as I was leaving, but inevitably the good new stuff is the first to get nicked and broken, so there will always be a few sets of passive cans and a box of yellow foam disposables!Surely our military are using better ones than that nowadays?
I was recently at the range with a chap who's just left the German army. He had his issue ear-defenders with him, and they were the every-effective Peltor Optime III, in a fetching olive-green colour.
Why do you think they are not suitable for the range?Don’t make the mistake of believing/thinking they are suitable for range use. At best the occasional rifle shot when out stalking where any attenuation is better than none.
It’s a pity as I prefer a brimmed hat to baseball caps.
K
For me it’s simply that they do not reduce noise by the same degree as muffs. However, I’ve since given this more thought in light of the db reduction figures being quoted and have concluded that what ear buds do not do is protect the bone around the ears (skull) from concussion. Something that is particularly noticeable in covered areas such as the BSRC “Statics” FP and the Running Deer hut.Why do you think they are not suitable for the range?
Fair one, I have heard about the bones but being protected.For me it’s simply that they do not reduce noise by the same degree as muffs. However, I’ve since given this more thought in light of the db reduction figures being quoted and have concluded that what ear buds do not do is protect the bone around the ears (skull) from concussion. Something that is particularly noticeable in covered areas such as the BSRC “Statics” FP and the Running Deer hut.
Just my view but I’m not a Rocket Scientist.
K
What has leaf salad technology got to do with this, anyway?Just my view but I’m not a Rocket Scientist.
K
Which tips were you using? If you use suitable ones and insert them properly, they give significantly and measurably better noise reduction than over-ear hearing protection.For me it’s simply that they do not reduce noise by the same degree as muffs. However, I’ve since given this more thought in light of the db reduction figures being quoted and have concluded that what ear buds do not do is protect the bone around the ears (skull) from concussion. Something that is particularly noticeable in covered areas such as the BSRC “Statics” FP and the Running Deer hut.
Just my view but I’m not a Rocket Scientist.
K
They're the ones I use, very good once fitted properlyWhich tips were you using? If you use suitable ones and insert them properly, they give significantly and measurably better noise reduction than over-ear hearing protection.
I've confirmed this myself using both calibrated test tones, and at an all-day long-range session. I brought EEP-100s with the large foam tips as well as MSR Sordin Supreme Pro-X with the gel pads for doubling up. With only the over-ear set, the isolation seemed a bit inadequate, whereas I felt no need to supplement the in-ear set with over-ear ones even beside a muzzle-braked .338 Lapua.
Just use the right tips and put them in right. These ones are extremely effective:
![]()