Counterpoint:
View attachment 244217
View attachment 244216
Remington really doesn’t do itself any favours here.
Fully agreed, but I’d still say that Remington messed up here by aiming this sort of material at lonely kids.Meh, the US and UK governments are more than happy to sell chemical and other types of henious weapons to governments whose express intent is to use them against their own citizens in case of uprisings (Middle East/Saudi Arabia).
These are pop guns by comparison.
Between this, the terrible quality control, and their deliberate production of rifles with a known safety flaw in the trigger mechanism to save five and a half cents per unit — then covering it up and churning them out for six decades while putting the blame on the customers were it killed because of it — it’s difficult to have any sympathy for that rotten company.
Pressure cookers are designed to cook foodWonder if the people whose relatives got killed in the Boston Marathon bombing sued the company that made the pressure cooker from which the terrorist made the IED.
Or the lorry manufacturer whose product was used to murder innocent people at the Berlin Xmas market.
Or whoever made the backpack that carried the bomb in the Ariana Grande concert bombing.
Sadly firearms are a lightning rod for political and social scorn, yet it has been forgotten that they are tools and most working households owned at least one not long ago.
That doesn’t seem entirely unreasonable. I don’t think the gun industry does anyone a favour if a manufacturer is genuinely promoting its military-derived designs to the immature and insecure as a way to feel powerful and dominating.
It would be interesting to see the material in question, at least.
I mean, placing ads with a “consider your man card reissued” slogan into video games to sell an AR-15 clone does come across as being slightly irresponsible at best. What benefit is there from promoting guns that way?
Exactly!I cannot see how a maker of the gun used in the 'massacre' is in any way to blame for what happened.
Good points and its legal activism that has had an effect (in the US) on tobacco, pharma, environmental issues.Remington have reached a $73m settlement with some of the Sandy Hook parents
However, a couple points need to be clarified:
1. Remington attempted to stop the proceedings by appealing to the Supreme Court, but the court declined to hear their appeal, thus allowing the case to continue and reach the settlement announced today
2. Arguably more important than the money is all the internal Remington documents which the plaintiffs claim show Remingtons misconduct will now be made public
3. Remington is bankrupt and will not be making any payout - the money is coming from their insurers -and that is the big problem for the gun industry, because after this judgement, insurance companies will be less likely to insure gun companies and if they do, the premiums will rocket - which in turn will force gun makers to increase prices.
I'm not taking sides here, but after all the mass shootings that have happened in the USA over the past few years, this was always going to happen.
When we have a multiple fatality shooting in the UK, gun laws get tougher.
In the USA, where the second amendment protects the right to bear arms, it's civil law that is more likely to bring change
Cheers
Bruce
A lot of it came from slavery, friend.Most of them don't know where the great wealth of their ancestors came from
Really?Meh, the US and UK governments are more than happy to sell chemical and other types of henious weapons to governments whose express intent is to use them against their own citizens in case of uprisings (Middle East/Saudi Arabia).
These are pop guns by comparison.
Or cigarette companies using cartoon camels to convince kids that smoking is fun and cool… oh wait.I mean, if you're ok with car manufacturers selling road cars by pushing 0-60 times, Nurburgring lap times, top speeds and power figures, or spirit ads implying that alcohol makes you fun, attractive and manly, or fast food companies suggesting that their products make you happy and sociable, or, or, or, then what's the difference?
If advertising is truly the basis of the case. I wonder when Hollywood or rockstar games will be up in court?Counterpoint:
View attachment 244217
View attachment 244216
Remington really doesn’t do itself any favours here.
Sure, but why not just spend the extra five-and-a-half cents to make a trigger that doesn’t go off by itself? Seems like false economy at best.