Role of BASC members praised at Liberal Democrats conference

Has anyone noticed that the majority of BASC bashers on this forum can’t be arsed to support the forum financially?

Seems funny they welcome the platform to peddle carp, but just for free.
Nope your are quite right, I’ll pay trade membership if I’m selling that is it.

As long as the SD if free to use I shall use it, I’ll not support it unless I’m selling, if I becomes membership only I’ll cross that bridge when it comes to !

I presume the carp jibe is a snipe at me 😂🖕
 
Last edited:
No. I disagree
Sorry, what exactly do you disagree with?
even though I owned and shot pistols from my first FAC in 1976 right up to the Tory handgun ban. Fullbore pistols might be used for amusement shooting at targets but they have only one purpose for originally being held by the public which was that of self defence. Rifles had that, sefl defence or rather defence of the realm as a valid reason and equally valid to be owned for use for hunting game.
I disagree. This is why. Originally a person did not need any "reason" to own either so it is rather peculiar to claim that they could only be held for self defence. I've personally used a pistol for shooting small game, I know others use them as a back up for large game. They've also been used indoors for vermin, outdoors for feral, injured or diseased animals etc etc.
Similarly the use of full bore semi autos is entirely valid for various live quarry uses without being excessive.
And any use for shooting a targets was merely useful practice for developing skill at arms in their use. Once self defence was removed for the majority as a "good reason" to possess then any continued attempt to justify being permitted to own them was moot. I didn't agree with the ban but, alas, the logic of it was inescapable in respect to pistols. Why do you need a weapon capable of killing a man to merely make holes in a paper target twenty yards away?
Because they're useful for the various other uses listed above.
I do fear that in some, sadly, not too distant future that target shooting if on its own as being the sole "need" to possess a centrefire rifle may indeed cease to be accepted as "good reason". By the same logic of why (if you don't shoot deer or similar or larger sized cloven footed quarry) do you need a weapon capable of killing a man at half a mile to merely make holes in a paper target? As you could equally do that hobby with a high end air rifle.
 
If BASC got handguns back to s1, I could see some on here only being able to complain that SLRs remain illegal.
Indeed. If only the same energy by the BASC bashers went into encouraging everyone to back campaigns as and when they arise. I have lost count of the 'tumbleweed' posts here and elsewhere when there have been calls to action.

For example, a decade ago a few of us from various organisations tried to get back the ownership and use of .22 calibre rimfire pistols for sporting purposes in England, Wales and Scotland, starting with a government petition. The organisations and sporting press backed this UNITY campaign and the lack of unity was a rude awakening with only 21K signatures secured.


Time for BASC bashers to STOP and get behind BASC, and if you have nothing constructive to say, put a lid on it.

As an all-party organisation, BASC attends all autumn party conferences. Having attended the Reform and Liberal Democrat conferences we will also be at the Green, Labour and Conservative conferences in the weeks ahead.
 
Similarly the use of full bore semi autos is entirely valid for various live quarry uses without being excessive.
Yes I agree with that in respect of both self-loading and pump action full bore rifles. I knew people who had the excellent HK SL7 and the Remington 760 in both cases in .308 Winchester. And concur with you too in the matter of pistols for humane dispatch.

But the fact remains that when modern cartridge loading pistols and revolvers became available that nobody purchased them for the reasons of recreational target shooting that was not done in furtherance of improving their owner's ability and skill in using them either for defence of self or defence of property. So the rest you've mentioned about target shooting we'll have to agree to disagree. I grew up in a family where both my own father and my mother's father (my grandfather) had lawfully possessed, as soldiers, personally owned pistols for personal use that was for only but had for protection. They never ever considered using them for target shooting as a pastime in its own right.
 
Time for BASC bashers to STOP and get behind BASC, and if you have nothing constructive to say, put a lid on it.
That makes it sound as though the BASC-bashers (of whom I hope I may be considered one) have nothing constructive to say.

It might be worth considering that constructive criticism is only actually constructive if the criticised body is capable of understanding that not everyone shares the view that it is infallible.
If the criticised body does indeed believe it is incapable of doing anything wrong, then there is no such thing as constructive criticism: all criticism is, since it must by definition be baseless, either malicious or the product of a lack of understanding.
BASC seem generously to take the view that it is almost always the latter, and therefore keep telling us we're wrong while pointing in other directions.

As an aside, the suggestion that BASC-bashers do nothing but try to help BASC see itself as some of the more insightful members (as they themselves might see it, at least) of the shooting community see it is not helpful: responding to petitions, consultations etc and writing to (or visiting) our MPs from time to time should be part of all shooting-folks' standard behaviour - and I suspect this behaviour is likely to be more-strongly expressed among those who are trying to help BASC become something they feel they might (once more, in my case) be able to support.

Might be wrong, though...
 
Indeed. If only the same energy by the BASC bashers went into encouraging everyone to back campaigns as and when they arise. I have lost count of the 'tumbleweed' posts here and elsewhere when there have been calls to action.

For example, a decade ago a few of us from various organisations tried to get back the ownership and use of .22 calibre rimfire pistols for sporting purposes in England, Wales and Scotland, starting with a government petition. The organisations and sporting press backed this UNITY campaign and the lack of unity was a rude awakening with only 21K signatures secured.


Time for BASC bashers to STOP and get behind BASC, and if you have nothing constructive to say, put a lid on it.

As an all-party organisation, BASC attends all autumn party conferences. Having attended the Reform and Liberal Democrat conferences we will also be at the Green, Labour and Conservative conferences in the weeks ahead.
As an all party representative of shooters lobbying type organisation the BASC has to remain to non political. It has to be all about policy.

However in my Humble little opinion

Farage is a buffoon and is a Trump stooge. They are very good performers and make many follow them - why? i have no clue

The Tories are an utter shadow of their former self. Likes of Hestletine, Ken Clarke etc were statesmen and gentlemen. I thought the coalition did well under Cameron’s leadership - but then they got a lunatic idiots like Boris, Truss and Rees Mogg

Labour - Blair didn’t do a bad job in his early years - indeed is was good for business, but then they got banking crash happened and they got it wrong IMHO. Starmer is struggling with a lot of pretty incompetent people alongside. And he is frightened of offending anyone and thus offending all.

And the Libdems have an open goal in the middle ground but they don’t even seem to be on the pitch, let alone in the right city for the match

SNP - couldn’t build a paper boat, let alone run a parish council.
 
As an all party representative of shooters lobbying type organisation the BASC has to remain to non political. It has to be all about policy.

However in my Humble little opinion

Farage is a buffoon and is a Trump stooge. They are very good performers and make many follow them - why? i have no clue

The Tories are an utter shadow of their former self. Likes of Hestletine, Ken Clarke etc were statesmen and gentlemen. I thought the coalition did well under Cameron’s leadership - but then they got a lunatic idiots like Boris, Truss and Rees Mogg

Labour - Blair didn’t do a bad job in his early years - indeed is was good for business, but then they got banking crash happened and they got it wrong IMHO. Starmer is struggling with a lot of pretty incompetent people alongside. And he is frightened of offending anyone and thus offending all.

And the Libdems have an open goal in the middle ground but they don’t even seem to be on the pitch, let alone in the right city for the match

SNP - couldn’t build a paper boat, let alone run a parish council.
IMG_2853.webp
 
I really don’t get the negativity over this, it’s like some people on here are so determined to be angry at BASC for other mis-steps (and I’d agree they exist) that they have to see the negative in everything it does. If BASC got handguns back to s1, I could see some on here only being able to complain that SLRs remain illegal.

A national party appearing to endorse field sports can only be a good thing in normalising (or, perhaps, re-normalising) field sports as something people do. While largely symbolic, it’s a symbol in our favour and it’s got to limit their ability to simultaneously endorse anti causes if they’re ‘on record’ being on our side.

That’s not to say much comfort can be taken from this, we all know politicians (of all creeds) will happily turn on shooters if they need to show they’re ’doing something’.

Political parties will inevitably feel the need to take a position on field sports. If BASC or other orgs don’t work to make it a positive position, LACS, HSA, OneKind etc will gladly step in to make it a negative one. So, at least on that level, this must be seen as a success.

I don’t think its negativity as such, more the timing of this and Ed Davey’s outburst the other day. Lets face it the bloke is completely bat **** crazy and his comments the other day regarding school shootings completely remove any doubt of that, so easy to believe he and the nutters that follow him are more of a threat to shooting than the other parties, hence the comments.
Would be interesting to hear if BASC addresses Davey’s comments.

Conversely similar BASC interaction with Reform was received in a more positive light a whlie ago on here, probably because they are perceived as friend of shooting regardless of their other political stance.
 
Last edited:
supports country sports
Yet if you contact your mp or candidates at election, and ask for opinions, then you might find plenty of them recognise & value the financial & ecological local benefits they bring in. I know our lib dem candidate does as he's from farming background & I took the time to ask him (and he got my vote).
 
As an all party representative of shooters lobbying type organisation the BASC has to remain to non political. It has to be all about policy.

However in my Humble little opinion

Farage is a buffoon and is a Trump stooge. They are very good performers and make many follow them - why? i have no clue

The Tories are an utter shadow of their former self. Likes of Hestletine, Ken Clarke etc were statesmen and gentlemen.
Neither Heseltine nor Clarke were statesmen and most certainly neither a gentleman.
I thought the coalition did well under Cameron’s leadership -
The rest of the electorate wasn't impressed.
but then they got a lunatic idiots like Boris, Truss and Rees Mogg

Labour - Blair didn’t do a bad job in his early years - indeed is was good for business, but then they got banking crash happened and they got it wrong IMHO.
Yup. PFI was a triumph, the "moral foreign policy", Iraq and war on terror all absolute triumphs, chaotic mismanagement of the economy before the crash, etc etc.
Starmer is struggling with a lot of pretty incompetent people alongside
He fxxking picked them. The probpem is that HE is incompetent, to his own surprise.
And he is frightened of offending anyone and thus offending all.

And the Libdems have an open goal in the middle ground but they don’t even seem to be on the pitch, let alone in the right city for the match
They're not even on the right planet .
SNP - couldn’t build a paper boat, let alone run a parish council.
Just like Labour and everyone to the left of e.g. Sunak.
 
Indeed. If only the same energy by the BASC bashers went into encouraging everyone to back campaigns as and when they arise. I have lost count of the 'tumbleweed' posts here and elsewhere when there have been calls to action.

For example, a decade ago a few of us from various organisations tried to get back the ownership and use of .22 calibre rimfire pistols for sporting purposes in England, Wales and Scotland, starting with a government petition. The organisations and sporting press backed this UNITY campaign and the lack of unity was a rude awakening with only 21K signatures secured.


Time for BASC bashers to STOP and get behind BASC, and if you have nothing constructive to say, put a lid on it.

As an all-party organisation, BASC attends all autumn party conferences. Having attended the Reform and Liberal Democrat conferences we will also be at the Green, Labour and Conservative conferences in the weeks ahead.

I’m afraid this highlights the issues across BASC, an unwillingness to listen to anything except glowing praise for the BASC and acting purely in the interests of BASC employees not the members who fund it, (or would join and fund if it were more fit for purpose). Despite the Commies, we still enjoy freedom of speech in this country, and whilst you should of course discount ‘hurty words’, BASC needs to listen to its audience and cannot rely on the ever decreasing shooting insurance monopoly to attract and retain members. Shouting down and deriding opinions (or as BASC Bashers) that do not suit BASC is unlikely to deliver the membership or appreciation you appear to crave.
 
I’m afraid this highlights the issues across BASC, an unwillingness to listen to anything except glowing praise for the BASC and acting purely in the interests of BASC employees not the members who fund it, (or would join and fund if it were more fit for purpose). Despite the Commies, we still enjoy freedom of speech in this country, and whilst you should of course discount ‘hurty words’, BASC needs to listen to its audience and cannot rely on the ever decreasing shooting insurance monopoly to attract and retain members. Shouting down and deriding opinions (or as BASC Bashers) that do not suit BASC is unlikely to deliver the membership or appreciation you appear to crave.
This is not constructive so perhaps you did not listen yourself to the earlier advice and you have form with other non constructive comments in other threads such as: Ban All Shooting Clubs ….. always wondered what BASC stood for! BASC to conspire with Commies to ban vapes ? Wow, what next BASC to buy ‘lollipops for French Polynesians?’ I won’t be using steel regardless of how much BASC is paid to shill it.

Perhaps give the BASC bashing a rest and demonstrate some self-awareness and maturity.
 
Wow! There’s a blast from the past. There used to be a political party with the same name.
Apologies, a sarcastic comment on the credibility of the Lib Dems as a political party at this “interesting” time in UK politics.
 
This is not constructive so perhaps you did not listen yourself to the earlier advice and you have form with other non constructive comments in other threads such as: Ban All Shooting Clubs ….. always wondered what BASC stood for! BASC to conspire with Commies to ban vapes ? Wow, what next BASC to buy ‘lollipops for French Polynesians?’ I won’t be using steel regardless of how much BASC is paid to shill it.

Perhaps give the BASC bashing a rest and demonstrate some self-awareness and maturity.

Thank you for making my point for me … take useful constructive action benefiting members and maybe the hurty words will stop and you might get engagement?
 
Back
Top