Thats because the mackerel season is the same as salmon netting season.We went through a spell of finding seal corpses washed up on the beaches here, they had all been shot with heavy loads from shotguns, never got to the bottom of who was doing it or why but happened when the mackerel were in season , to be honest you would think there would have been enough mackerel for everyone to enjoy including the seals![]()
I understand the frustration with seals. But the fundamental issue with diminishing salmon and other fish stocks are not a few apex predators, but pollution and environmental damage caused by man.Fishy pork ? No kidding they need local culling if we are to save salmon and seatrout stocks in some rivers, its an apex predator until these white sharks show more .
Try getting it through Parliament though............ !? You will have Mrs Smith from the midlands making a heck of a fuss etc. etc.
Problem is no natural predators and full legal protection , no government with the stones required to do something
But, did it work well as bait?I cut one up to use as longline and pot bait once. I think it was a bit past its best, though. To this day I can remember my newly-wedded wife (who gets seasick at the best of times) sitting in the bottom of the boat trying to bait up a hundred hooks with stinking seal meat as we bobbed about on a rolling swell. It was not the finest hour of our relationship.
No.But, did it work well as bait?
That is the bit of most interest![]()
Dunno but if they "stood out better" against a white background I suspect they would have died out long before .Would the fluffy ones not be easier to shoot as they stand out better?
Double bugger then.
They used to do that up nr sea houses years ago !The father of one of my Swedish friends was the official net minder and seal shooter for a while. He used to set up on the harbour wall and wait for seals to try rob the nets. He used to get a couple each year.
The harbour was a popular tourist destination, no one batted an eye at the man with the rifle sitting in the camp chair drinking coffee.
Of course its not the sole reason . However the turbines in my area are devoid of life practically no fish there . some say its sonic vibrations others say its damage to the sea bed . All i can say is turbine sites are not always a draw to fish , often the opposite.I understand the frustration with seals. But the fundamental issue with diminishing salmon and other fish stocks are not a few apex predators, but pollution and environmental damage caused by man.
We have polluted the rivers so numbers of fry and small parr down to the sea are much reduced. Human sewerage covers spawning beds.
Then when the get to the sea the population of placton, krill, small fish, sand eels etc etc have been wiped out. Trawlers, especially seas bed trawlers that plough up the seabed killing all the kelp forests don’t help. Populations of krill etc have collapsed and they are the basis of the food chain.
So all the small parr don’t have a chance to grow into big salmon. So only a proportion then return to the rivers.
A lot of blame quite rightly is focused on salmon farms - they are just one contributing factor.
If you look back in history, wild Salmon netting stations would catch hundreds of fish each month and did so so for centuries. Salmon was food for the poor.
If you look at salmon rivers in Alaska where there are still wild salmon runs there are huge volumes of salmon running each year. More than enough to support large populations of sea lions, beats, wolves, eagles etc and plenty for both commercial and sport fishermen.
The trouble with the sea is that the damage is below the waves and not visible. As for all the rewilding bollox, a far far more effective spend of money would be to buy out big sea bed trawlers and to all the sea bed and kelp forests to recover. Kelp abd other seaweeds and micro algae grow at a huge rate and suck up huge amounts of CO2. And they don’t need planting etc.
It just needs man to stop causing the damage.
One of the huge benefits of the offshore wind farms is no fishing in amongst them. This is creating very effective breeding grounds for fish.
I was talking with one of the river keeps on the Helmsdale last year. He was saying most of the local seals now don’t bother with river mouths - they travel out to wind farms to feed.
been busy the last 20 years removing them and planting the birch etc that the river and the trout and parr need the insect life that accompanies them . But yeah planting the wrong kind of trees is a historic issue that has been undergoing fixes for many years now .Spawning beds for Salmonids ( Redds) are usually in the headwaters of river systems.
The land around these spawning areas have mostly been planted with commercial softwood and this softwood leaches acid into the watercourses which in turn raises the ph of the water and kills the eggs of the fish.
Forestry companies know this.
I understand the frustration with seals. But the fundamental issue with diminishing salmon and other fish stocks are not a few apex predators, but pollution and environmental damage caused by man.
We have polluted the rivers so numbers of fry and small parr down to the sea are much reduced. Human sewerage covers spawning beds.
Then when the get to the sea the population of placton, krill, small fish, sand eels etc etc have been wiped out. Trawlers, especially seas bed trawlers that plough up the seabed killing all the kelp forests don’t help. Populations of krill etc have collapsed and they are the basis of the food chain.
So all the small parr don’t have a chance to grow into big salmon. So only a proportion then return to the rivers.
A lot of blame quite rightly is focused on salmon farms - they are just one contributing factor.
If you look back in history, wild Salmon netting stations would catch hundreds of fish each month and did so so for centuries. Salmon was food for the poor.
If you look at salmon rivers in Alaska where there are still wild salmon runs there are huge volumes of salmon running each year. More than enough to support large populations of sea lions, beats, wolves, eagles etc and plenty for both commercial and sport fishermen.
The trouble with the sea is that the damage is below the waves and not visible. As for all the rewilding bollox, a far far more effective spend of money would be to buy out big sea bed trawlers and to all the sea bed and kelp forests to recover. Kelp abd other seaweeds and micro algae grow at a huge rate and suck up huge amounts of CO2. And they don’t need planting etc.
It just needs man to stop causing the damage.
One of the huge benefits of the offshore wind farms is no fishing in amongst them. This is creating very effective breeding grounds for fish.
I was talking with one of the river keeps on the Helmsdale last year. He was saying most of the local seals now don’t bother with river mouths - they travel out to wind farms to feed.
sandeel for fertilizer was a massive mistakeYip when I worked in the fish farm we farmed Turbot but the other farms were salmon based, we fed tons of sand eels and other fish chopped up. The price of sand eel went sky high when their populations crashed as a result of fishing that effected puffins and gannets feeding their young. Everything needs to be done in balance with nature and we are the ultimate apex predator who keeps getting it wrong and blaming Mother Nature.![]()
when predator and prey are out of balance you have an issue . In balance the seal will help the Salmon by weeding out more weak members than fit .how any one can blame predators for salmon is crazy, the lived for thousands of years together. another man made balls up. ban salmon farming, ban commercial fishing. kill seals for fur or meat but to protect salmon, cant see the justifcation holding water