Should crossbows be banned

Should crossbows be banned

  • Yes

    Votes: 24 14.7%
  • No

    Votes: 139 85.3%

  • Total voters
    163
There does seem to be a funny attitude on display here.

Surely there are laws governing the misuse of crossbows, axes, cricket bats, bar stools....... punish the behaviour, not the inanimate object. How is the ban on knives working out for you?
 
You are perhaps forgetting the murder that took place back in April?


And the other murder in Wales back in 2019:


The man shot with a crossbow bolt last year:


The Colchester man shot in the stomach with a crossbow bolt back in September:


And the man injured in London earlier this year:


These were found with the simplest of Google searches - I remember the two murders, but the number of criminal injuries surprised me.

A couple of the petitions calling for the regulation and/or banning of crossbows state that, up until February this year, there were 42 incidents of death or injury resulting from the use of a crossbow since 2003, and 43 other incidents where crossbows have been used to threaten:


Maybe it behoves all of us to do a little research into the size and nature of the problem before suggesting there isn’t one?
You do realise that there are about 650 - 680 thousand deaths in the UK per year, right? So if your numbers stack up, then over the period 2003 -2021 there have been over 12.5 million deaths. A sliver of perspective on the story. I don't think the crusade is really aiming (non deliberate pun) to make the UK a safer place in any meaningful sense.
 
You do realise that there are about 650 - 680 thousand deaths in the UK per year, right? So if your numbers stack up, then over the period 2003 -2021 there have been over 12.5 million deaths. A sliver of perspective on the story. I don't think the crusade is really aiming (non deliberate pun) to make the UK a safer place in any meaningful sense.

You do realise you’re comparing deaths in general with pre-meditated murder and deliberate infliction of injury, right?
 
If knives were to be banned ........................, Our kitchen wouldn't need a hefty supply of elastoplast by her chopping board, suppose I could label the handly bits as handles, & the sharp bits as not the handle.:-|
SWMBO's hands look like a supply source for skin grafts.o_O
 
You do realise that there are about 650 - 680 thousand deaths in the UK per year, right? So if your numbers stack up, then over the period 2003 -2021 there have been over 12.5 million deaths. A sliver of perspective on the story. I don't think the crusade is really aiming (non deliberate pun) to make the UK a safer place in any meaningful sense.
Patel has some REAL powers to have a real and lasting impact on the safety of the UK - yet she's constantly failed to address the issue of the waves of new rubber dinghy tourists arriving by the hundred on the Kent coast; new Apple phone in one hand and outstretched palm in the other...

Recent attempts to address the new wave citizens preferred imported modus operandi of mugging-by-moped, with a free acid peel face wash for all customers, also saw some legislation pinned to the back of the new restriction on the sales of acid, that similar to the possible impact on crossbow ownership, saw extra restrictions on the UK citizen which had zero connection to the problem which brought about said new law
 
You do realise you’re comparing deaths in general with pre-meditated murder and deliberate infliction of injury, right?
Yes, the point i am making is that your chance of being one of those premeditated deaths is so unbelievably small as to make me wonder why you are so keen to surrender the remaining freedoms you have to save yourself from something that has less than 1000th of the likelihood of killing you that heart disease does.
Stop paying attention to stuff that will never affect you. Go live your life instead.
 
Yes, the point i am making is that your chance of being one of those premeditated deaths is so unbelievably small as to make me wonder why you are so keen to surrender the remaining freedoms you have to save yourself from something that has less than 1000th of the likelihood of killing you that heart disease does.
Stop paying attention to stuff that will never affect you. Go live your life instead.

You’re making assumptions.

What is your evidence that I am so keen to surrender the remaining freedoms we have?
 
Last edited:
I've got a 175lb draw weight crossbow rifle, bought on a whim to see how accurate and powerful they are........

Weapons like that most definitely need some kind of legislation imho.

It is frighteningly accurate and seriously powerful, some of the bolt heads readily available are crazy, look at it this way - I would be more scared of having it pointed at me than a shotgun.

We are not talking about bows and arrows we made as kids or catapults we used, we all dread new legislation but in the wrong hands things would end very badly, maybe legislation before a serious incident isnt a bad thing...
 
What’s amusing about threads like this is the lack of further commital from the Op🤭😁🤓😊😂🤩
Float goes under ,you strike and voila ,every cast a tiddler.
I bet old FH is smugly laughing his tits off 😂😂😂😂
 
The views of the pro licensing and anti licensing bring up interesting questions. What strikes me is that it is the person that needs to be licensed rather than the item. It stands to reason that if you are sensible enough to possess a firearm then you will also be ok to own a crossbow, air rifle, powerful car, motorbike, chainsaw, samurai sword etc etc. on the other hand there are people who aren’t fit to own anything more dangerous than colouring pencils and it is identifying these people that is the key. Let’s be honest the current firearms licensing setup does not work efficiently and needs reform. It could be streamlined quite readily without adverse effect on the public which would benefit everyone. For example get rid of the 1:1 variations and allow each deer stalker to possess up to 5 (??) deer calibre rifles that may be swapped and changed at will. Similar setup for target shooters, foxers, vermin controllers etc. The process of firearms licensing cannot be substantially different to the CRB checking process to spot kiddy fiddlers and those who put vulnerable people at risk. Could these processes not be largely combined to everyone’s benefit?
I just wonder why anyone would think someone with more than 5 guns would be more dangerous than someone with 10 guns. Have you tried firing 2 rifles at the same time and if you went on the rampage with 10 guns how do you carry them and all the different ammo. Can't understand why people think more is dangerous. An FAC for rifles should let you own any number within whatever calibre range authorised
 
I just wonder why anyone would think someone with more than 5 guns would be more dangerous than someone with 10 guns. Have you tried firing 2 rifles at the same time and if you went on the rampage with 10 guns how do you carry them and all the different ammo. Can't understand why people think more is dangerous. An FAC for rifles should let you own any number within whatever calibre range authorised
That is because you are thinking rationally.
 
I just wonder why anyone would think someone with more than 5 guns would be more dangerous than someone with 10 guns.
Because more than five guns and you become the "sad loner with an arsenal of weapons" so loved of the press whereas under five and you are a mere "strange individual with an unhealthy interest in guns". But five guns is OK. That's normal. Because I've got five guns and so that's alright.
 
I just wonder why anyone would think someone with more than 5 guns would be more dangerous than someone with 10 guns. Have you tried firing 2 rifles at the same time and if you went on the rampage with 10 guns how do you carry them and all the different ammo. Can't understand why people think more is dangerous. An FAC for rifles should let you own any number within whatever calibre range authorised

 
I've got a 175lb draw weight crossbow rifle, bought on a whim to see how accurate and powerful they are........

Weapons like that most definitely need some kind of legislation imho.

It is frighteningly accurate and seriously powerful, some of the bolt heads readily available are crazy, look at it this way - I would be more scared of having it pointed at me than a shotgun.

We are not talking about bows and arrows we made as kids or catapults we used, we all dread new legislation but in the wrong hands things would end very badly, maybe legislation before a serious incident isnt a bad thing...
So if we need more legislation why are there so few incidents with these?

The answer is because they are hard to conceal.

If you want legislation (why?) best look at recurves, compounds and longbows too.

I’m guessing you also want air rifles out on ticket as well, these, particularly PCPs are easily to tune to high power and are apparently a favourite for gangs in NZ for their stealth.
 
Back
Top