Should crossbows be banned

Should crossbows be banned

  • Yes

    Votes: 24 14.7%
  • No

    Votes: 139 85.3%

  • Total voters
    163
That’s exactly where we are heading - the anti’s are being clever, basically make it such a pain to get into the sport that nobody bothers anymore….voila! The death of all things shooting.

This is a big reason why the pro-gun US folks defend every attempt so ferociously, as they know it just leads to losing more ground eventually. And I see their point!

Regards,
Gixer
It never ceases to amaze me how many UK shotgun and rifle owners just don’t get this and simply will not accept their preferred shooting discipline is in anyway endangered by the lose of an allied sport or increased restrictions on such.

I still recall the comment of a fellow rifle & pistol club member on the day we both surrendered our pistols at Sevenoaks Police Station:

“Don’t worry, they’ll never take the long ones.”

To say I was dumbfounded would be an understatement and I’ve never spoken to the knob bloke since.

K
 
It never ceases to amaze me how many UK shotgun and rifle owners just don’t get this and simply will not accept their preferred shooting discipline is in anyway endangered by the lose of an allied sport or increased restrictions on such.

I still recall the comment of a fellow rifle & pistol club member on the day we both surrendered our pistols at Sevenoaks Police Station:

“Don’t worry, they’ll never take the long ones.”

To say I was dumbfounded would be an understatement and I’ve never spoken to the knob bloke since.

K
Death of a thousand cuts....
 
Are we also arguing that there shouldn’t be any licensing in place for guns?f

A genuine asset on the benefits to society on our last licensing regime would be a useful excercise. No benefit, no law might be the outcome or more likely a focus on legislative action were benefits accure and less time wasted on assessing if land is "safe" for a 243/Creedmore or similar calibre.
 
Peter Sutcliffe was attacked and blinded with a pencil!
Create an environment where it is easy to get things banned and one day you will be banned yourself.
 
One non-injury incident involving a crossbow and everyone's getting their knickers in a twist meanwhile about 5 people are killed each week by drunk drivers and an average of over 7,500 reported injuries are caused by dog attacks each year.
You are perhaps forgetting the murder that took place back in April?


And the other murder in Wales back in 2019:


The man shot with a crossbow bolt last year:


The Colchester man shot in the stomach with a crossbow bolt back in September:


And the man injured in London earlier this year:


These were found with the simplest of Google searches - I remember the two murders, but the number of criminal injuries surprised me.

A couple of the petitions calling for the regulation and/or banning of crossbows state that, up until February this year, there were 42 incidents of death or injury resulting from the use of a crossbow since 2003, and 43 other incidents where crossbows have been used to threaten:


Maybe it behoves all of us to do a little research into the size and nature of the problem before suggesting there isn’t one?
 
Not heard that argument, though around my area at the time it was becoming increasingly difficult to nip out for a pint of milk & a fresh loaf of wholemeal without roving bands of pygmy's peppering you in the arse from 80 feet away with poison darts...
But these days Pygmy’s are a minority group and peppering the odd hairy arsed passer by with a traditional blowpipe is positively encouraged 🤣
 
You are perhaps forgetting the murder that took place back in April?


And the other murder in Wales back in 2019:


The man shot with a crossbow bolt last year:


The Colchester man shot in the stomach with a crossbow bolt back in September:


And the man injured in London earlier this year:


These were found with the simplest of Google searches - I remember the two murders, but the number of criminal injuries surprised me.

A couple of the petitions calling for the regulation and/or banning of crossbows state that, up until February this year, there were 42 incidents of death or injury resulting from the use of a crossbow since 2003, and 43 other incidents where crossbows have been used to threaten:


Maybe it behoves all of us to do a little research into the size and nature of the problem before suggesting there isn’t one?
A good post. I'm glad you've looked into this and can tell us that the problem is as microscopically irrelevant as the petitions say.
There is a problem and it is completely insignificant and a waste of taxpayers' money to even examine.
 
You are perhaps forgetting the murder that took place back in April?


And the other murder in Wales back in 2019:


The man shot with a crossbow bolt last year:


The Colchester man shot in the stomach with a crossbow bolt back in September:


And the man injured in London earlier this year:


These were found with the simplest of Google searches - I remember the two murders, but the number of criminal injuries surprised me.

A couple of the petitions calling for the regulation and/or banning of crossbows state that, up until February this year, there were 42 incidents of death or injury resulting from the use of a crossbow since 2003, and 43 other incidents where crossbows have been used to threaten:


Maybe it behoves all of us to do a little research into the size and nature of the problem before suggesting there isn’t one?
Thank you for that. Since 2003?
Shows what an insignificant problem they are.
 
The views of the pro licensing and anti licensing bring up interesting questions. What strikes me is that it is the person that needs to be licensed rather than the item. It stands to reason that if you are sensible enough to possess a firearm then you will also be ok to own a crossbow, air rifle, powerful car, motorbike, chainsaw, samurai sword etc etc. on the other hand there are people who aren’t fit to own anything more dangerous than colouring pencils and it is identifying these people that is the key. Let’s be honest the current firearms licensing setup does not work efficiently and needs reform. It could be streamlined quite readily without adverse effect on the public which would benefit everyone. For example get rid of the 1:1 variations and allow each deer stalker to possess up to 5 (??) deer calibre rifles that may be swapped and changed at will. Similar setup for target shooters, foxers, vermin controllers etc. The process of firearms licensing cannot be substantially different to the CRB checking process to spot kiddy fiddlers and those who put vulnerable people at risk. Could these processes not be largely combined to everyone’s benefit?
 
The views of the pro licensing and anti licensing bring up interesting questions. What strikes me is that it is the person that needs to be licensed rather than the item. It stands to reason that if you are sensible enough to possess a firearm then you will also be ok to own a crossbow, air rifle, powerful car, motorbike, chainsaw, samurai sword etc etc. on the other hand there are people who aren’t fit to own anything more dangerous than colouring pencils and it is identifying these people that is the key. Let’s be honest the current firearms licensing setup does not work efficiently and needs reform. It could be streamlined quite readily without adverse effect on the public which would benefit everyone. For example get rid of the 1:1 variations and allow each deer stalker to possess up to 5 (??) deer calibre rifles that may be swapped and changed at will. Similar setup for target shooters, foxers, vermin controllers etc. The process of firearms licensing cannot be substantially different to the CRB checking process to spot kiddy fiddlers and those who put vulnerable people at risk. Could these processes not be largely combined to everyone’s benefit?
But even a colouring ✏️ is capable of inflicting injury and death when in an unsafe pair of hands.

I do though 💯% agree it is the person as distinct from the item that needs to be licensed if we accept there is such need. Sadly there is more chance of getting a pork chop from a seagull than UK Government adopting this approach.
K
 
But even a colouring ✏️ is capable of inflicting injury and death when in an unsafe pair of hands.

I do though 💯% agree it is the person as distinct from the item that needs to be licensed if we accept there is such need. Sadly there is more chance of getting a pork chop from a seagull than UK Government adopting this approach.
K

I should have researched this better !!

 
Back
Top