London Jaeger
Well-Known Member
Thanks, yes the Rigby was the other option I was realistically looking at, for all the reasons you said above - it is essentially the same Rifle but with British skin and marketing. For some reason I was drawn more toward the Mauser than the Rigby, mainly I think due to both effectively being a Mauser at heart.I had a really good look at one about three years at Jagd & Hund. Nice well made rifle that will last several lifetimes. I have also had a good look at the Rigby Highland stalker. Basically the same rifle - hardly surprising since Mauser own Rigby. Rigby has a more English style stock finished in London, Mauser is finished in Germany.
And don’t understand the comments re it not being a usable rifle cos of wooden stock. Well I have a 50 year old Rigby in my gun cupboard - it has shot many many deer. Yes the bluing is somewhat worn, and the stock has a few dents, but I take it out quite regularly but do take care. I don’t through it on the back of a quad, or use it as a walking stick. Its an heirloom and I am using it and looking after it for future generations. I have changed the original 4x36 Scope for a Leica, but original scope can go back on very easily.
And it shoots very well.View attachment 190380View attachment 190381
Before making a decision I would defiantly like to go to the Rigby London Gunroom and look at the stock. I am sure it would not take much for a good salesman to sway me one was or the other.
I agree with the wood stock - as long as you are careful with it there is no reason you would have any issues. This a special rifle to take out on memorable stalking days - the impracticality of the wood stock is part of its charm! Just like fiddling around with socks and garters before a day on the pheasants is wonderfully unnecessary.