Fight! Fight! Fights!
You guys should have a duel
Grannysmith can use Lead
Jubnut can use Tungsten
Whoever wins was right
It'll be me.
The reason he's talking out of his arse.
Tungsten, the metal is hard.
Tungsten Matrix shot though (which GS will have been using in the dark ages) wasn't solid tungsten. It's tugsten powder compressed in resin. It's soft. I have some here and I can make an indent in it with my fingernail.
Bismuth is softer.
Steel and hevi shot are harder.
Todays tungsten shot is going to be TSS, ITX etc etc. Which, granted are harder than lead but... They outperform lead hands down.
My main issue with non toxic shot is the cost, I homeload and it's still bloody expensive stuff.
If you have the budget for Hevi shot or CGR powershot, etc it is a massive improvement in terms of pattern density and downrange energy over lead. I can load a shot size smaller, increase my pellet count etc and actually achieve greater energy/penetration than I ever could with any lead loads.
There is so much total shite spouted by old duffers like Grannysmith about non-lead shot and rifle ammo for that matter from people who made their minds up about it before they had even fired a cartridge, arse ended a teal and decided that because it took a bit of a retrieve it was the shot's fault not theirs. They have stuck to that opinion for twenty odd years and still spout the same old crap.
This is all despite the fact that all of the non-lead ammo has come on in leaps and bounds.
The big wildfowling loads used to have increased antimony and/or copper plated shot to make it harder!!! Anybody remember Winchester XX 2 ounce 2's?
Even steel which, admittedly in the first years of the lead ban was lacking is a truly viable alternative to lead now.
For anyone that is reading this thread and hasn't tried any of the non-lead alternatives ffs don't listen to the total bull**** on here, get some, try it with an open mind and make your own decisions.
Leave these old farts in the dark ages where they belong.