I've seen more foxes around here since the badger cull but whether that has had an impact I'm not sure. very few people shoot around here but I know from contacts elsewhere that in some areas fox numbers have declined.
The ever-increasing number of people shooting large numbers of foxes, far more than most, if not all hunts would get is bound to have an impact. I read reports of some shooting double figures in a night, that's an awful lot of foxes!
I've never shot foxes unless there was a need - ie. near poultry farms or in lambing country.
In my view there are too many people who shoot foxes so they can have a gun, rather than having a gun because they need to shoot foxes.
A place for everything and everything in its place. Foxes have a right to their place. They are a native species and part of natural landscape. Like badgers, they need controlling but not eradicating just so that people who want to shoot will have something to shoot at. Urban foxes on the other hand are a different matter.
Not saying I either believe or disbelieve the report. But I do know that when statistics are pulled from opposite directions they will inevitably become distorted.
"Can I? Should I? Must I?"
Seems to me there are a lot of people shooting foxes just because they can, regardless of whether they should. The widespread use of NV and Thermal surely makes for very efficient pest control, but I won't lie, it doesn't sit well with me that so many don't seem to draw a distinction between regulating numbers and wiping them out in the name of sport. It's surely vastly reduced the element of fair chase in recreational fox shooting.
When shooting is banned, folks will say "they" did it. Politicians and antis. But it will have been some of "us" and the way "we" act and think that gave them the ammunition to do it.


