But shockingly unreliable and will assault your wallet with gay abandon regularly
They were not reliable brand new what makes you think age and mileage will improve it
Don’t argue with me just do a google search for reliability tables , landrover has been at or near the bottom for over 3 decades…….
Naw, they are super reliable and brilliant. Ahem, said he who has just bought one.
That aside. If you were looking to buy a Range Rover, go for either a Freelander 2 or the disco sport with the 2.2 engine. That is probably the best and most reliable one they had. If you want a larger one, then the L322 4.4 would be the next best reliable engine. Going from my research.
The important thing is that you need to buy a good one, that has been (Very) well maintained and where they have ignored the manufacturers recommendations of servicing every 15,000 miles or whatever and gone to service it every 5 to 8,000 miles and done preventative maintenance. This will not stop you buying a wallet emptying lump of metal, but it will reduce the chances of it significantly. At the end of the day, these are (or where, seen as) a luxury car, and what ever happens, you will not be paying mondeo servicing prices. I was advised to put away £3k each year to allow for servicing (the full fat Range Rover) and things going wrong. If you can’t afford that, don’t think about it.
Of course, ignoring manufacturers servicing intervals could be said for every vehicle out there. I mean, 25,000 miles between services and gearbox sealed for life? What a crock of sh1t.
Now, anybody want to buy a Freelander 2? I will stick it in the for sales section, new (to me) car, forces sale.
