Hows the fixed power luv in going fellas? All feeling nice and warm and cuddly?



Might be how the picture is taken, but, that reticle doesn’t look to be lined up right to the rifle.I run two identical 8 x 56 S&B scopes with illuminated L3 reticle for my 7mm and .204 .
I have previously used a variable mag Swarovski on the .204 but it was only ever zoomed in for some zeroing or on occasion longish small critter bashing . I found 99% of my live shooting was on 8ish mag .
I personally like the robustness of the S&B 8 x 56 great light gathering and field of view with the nice solid centre ret and no parallax.
For foxing with the .204 most of my shots are sub 200m with the occasional stretching to the 250-300m and this ret is ample for foxing at those ranges .
For deer it's great as most of my shots are sub 250m its easy to see the solid centre ret .
The Fox size gong is more like a small vixen size.
View attachment 93223
Fox size gong @ 200m
View attachment 93224
300m
View attachment 93225
For me the fixed 8 x 56 fulfils all my needs .
Gong after a 300m practice at 200 & 300m the reason ( honestly) for some spread out grouping is I choose clean areas of the gong to see the bullet hits.
As I run and use the same scopes for all my CF shooting , for me the fix mag scopes completely do all I need .
I just realised before all the keyboard warriors start bipping over putting the gong against the role bale and not safe , farmer won't be happy etc etc etc . The farmer was with me having a few shots and he put it there and there is a bank behind the bail and on the 200m gong they were older scrap bails and about 4 deep .
I run two identical 8 x 56 S&B scopes with illuminated L3 reticle for my 7mm and .204 .
I have previously used a variable mag Swarovski on the .204 but it was only ever zoomed in for some zeroing or on occasion longish small critter bashing . I found 99% of my live shooting was on 8ish mag .
I personally like the robustness of the S&B 8 x 56 great light gathering and field of view with the nice solid centre ret and no parallax.
For foxing with the .204 most of my shots are sub 200m with the occasional stretching to the 250-300m and this ret is ample for foxing at those ranges .
For deer it's great as most of my shots are sub 250m its easy to see the solid centre ret .
The Fox size gong is more like a small vixen size.
View attachment 93223
Fox size gong @ 200m
View attachment 93224
300m
View attachment 93225
For me the fixed 8 x 56 fulfils all my needs .
Gong after a 300m practice at 200 & 300m the reason ( honestly) for some spread out grouping is I choose clean areas of the gong to see the bullet hits.
As I run and use the same scopes for all my CF shooting , for me the fix mag scopes completely do all I need .
I just realised before all the keyboard warriors start bipping over putting the gong against the role bale and not safe , farmer won't be happy etc etc etc . The farmer was with me having a few shots and he put it there and there is a bank behind the bail and on the 200m gong they were older scrap bails and about 4 deep .
Might be how the picture is taken, but, that reticle doesn’t look to be lined up right to the rifle.
Ken.
Might be how the picture is taken, but, that reticle doesn’t look to be lined up right to the rifle.
Ken.
Surely a case of the camera not being aligned to the lens?
it was taken with my phone....so I was just happy getting the pic
8X56 swaro ON MY 243 love it
I have an older Zeiss 6x42 in claw mounts on my 7x65r combination. Suspect it was the original scope that was fitted when it was made in 1974. Never felt I need any more and have taken Roe out to nearly 200