Hi
I hear the laws changing in America does anybody know if it's possible to bring back rifle brass or when the laws changing so that you can?
Unfortunately things haven't changed yet and the only brass you can bring back currently is that classed as for shotguns.
There will undoubtedly be numerous posts saying "I've done it before without issues" this doesn't make it legal and relying on a post on an Internet forum would be foolish indeed. It just shows that they weren't caught.
There are rumors that the rules are gong to be relaxed but until there's a definitive statement from the authorities I wouldn't risk it. The saving you potentially make isn't worth the risk of being prosecuted.
I'm afraid that is incorrect, below is an extract from the ITAR regulations. I draw your attention to Part 121, The United States Munitions list to the ITAR Regulations, Category III, Ammunition/ Ordnance Sub Para (f)(3) as published by the State Department on 30 Aug 17 (my bold):
Category III—Ammunition/Ordnance
*(a) Ammunition/ordnance for the articles in Categories I and II of this section.
(b) Ammunition/ordnance handling equipment specifically designed or modified for the articles controlled in this category, such as, belting, linking, and de-linking equipment.
(c) Equipment and tooling specifically designed or modified for the production of defense articles controlled by this category.
(d) Components, parts, accessories, attachments and associated equipment specifically designed or modified for the articles in this category:
*(1) Guidance and control components for the articles in paragraph (a) of this category;
*(2) Safing, arming and fuzing components (including target detection and localization devices) for the articles in paragraph (a) of this category; and
(3) All other components, parts, accessories, attachments and associated equipment for the articles in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this category.
(e) Technical data (as defined in §120.10 of this subchapter) and defense services (as defined in §120.9 of this subchapter) directly related to the defense articles described in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this category. Technical data directly related to the manufacture or production of any defense articles described elsewhere in this category that are designated as Significant Military Equipment (SME) shall itself be designated SME.
(f) The following explains and amplifies the terms used in this category and elsewhere in this subchapter:
(1) The components, parts, accessories and attachments controlled in this category include, but are not limited to cartridge cases, powder bags (or other propellant charges), bullets, jackets, cores, shells (excluding shotgun shells), projectiles (including canister rounds and submunitions therefor), boosters, firing components therefor, primers, and other detonating devices for the defense articles controlled in this category.
(2) This category does not control cartridge and shell casings that, prior to export, have been rendered useless beyond the possibility of restoration for use as a cartridge or shell casing by means of heating, flame treatment, mangling, crushing, cutting or popping.
(3) Equipment and tooling in paragraph (c) of this category does not include equipment for hand-loading ammunition.
(4) The articles in this category include any end item, component, accessory, attachment, part, firmware, software, or system that has been designed or manufactured using technical data and defense services controlled by this category.
(5) The articles specifically designed or modified for military application controlled in this category include any article specifically developed, configured, or adapted for military application.
Shotgun cartridges are exempt in that you can export commercial quantities as opposed to home loading quantities without an export licence.
FWIW I'd send it by USPS mail after speaking with the clerk at the US Post Office counter.
Surely item 1 (underlined) is more clearly applicable than item 3 (bold)?
I'm afraid not, Sub para (f) states that the lists below are an expansion of the description of the items described earlier. Sub para (c) is a "catch all" which includes everything associated with the manufacturing of ammunition.
Also Sub para (3) means that if you use a school ruler to measure case length it is also covered by ITAR.
Eh? Are you saying that you believe the export of cases to be legal or illegal? I may have the wrong end of the stick.
The clause I underlined is IN sub para (f) and clearly states that cartridge cases ARE controlled, and is obviously the operative clause with reference to ammunition components.
It's quite obvious that a school ruler is not controlled by ITAR whatever it is used for. Sub para (3) has no such effect, I presume you're relying on classifying a ruler as being "associated equipment" "designed or modified" for the production of ammunition or defence equipment. It's possible that you refer to the lower clause (3), but that explicitly states that a ruler would not be covered.
The ITAR regulation covers EVERYTHING associated or used in the manufacturing of ammunition and as such you need an export licence to remove it from the USA. Two exceptions stated are:
1. Shotgun cartridges.
2. Parts and equipment for the home loading of ammunition.
So, as long as the quantities of the brass are not considered commercial quantities it is perfectly legal to export them from the USA without an ITAR export licence. The only person I know to have fallen fowl for the exporting of brass was someone who tried shipping four 55 gallon oil drums filled with once fired pistol brass. As you can imagine there was no way that he could argue that, that amount was for home loading.
No, a ruler used in the measuring of the case length is classed as associated equipment:
(3) All other components, parts, accessories, attachments and associated equipment for the articles in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this category.
Stupid I know, but these regulations are written so that a prosecution can be obtained with very little physical evidence and you are down to arguing the item's intended purpose.
There is a gaping dissonance between what the regulation you quoted says and the meaning you're attaching to it. It is both explicit that brass cases are covered by the regulation, and transparently clear that a ruler is not governed by it.
I cannot understand how you can read that "The components, parts, accessories and attachments controlled in this category include, but are not limited to cartridge cases,"and understand the opposite. Nor can I understand how you contend that a ruler is a component, part, accessory, attachment or associated equipment for the production of ammunition and/or is specifically designed or modified for the production of defense articles. It manifestly isn't. A ruler is no more covered by that wording than an ice cream is.
The ITAR regulation covers EVERYTHING associated or used in the manufacturing of ammunition and as such you need an export licence to remove it from the USA. Two exceptions stated are:
1. Shotgun cartridges.
2. Parts and equipment for the home loading of ammunition.
So, as long as the quantities of the brass are not considered commercial quantities it is perfectly legal to export them from the USA without an ITAR export licence.
The ITAR regulation covers EVERYTHING associated or used in the manufacturing of ammunition and as such you need an export licence to remove it from the USA. Two exceptions stated are:
1. Shotgun cartridges.
2. Parts and equipment for the home loading of ammunition.
So, as long as the quantities of the brass are not considered commercial quantities it is perfectly legal to export them from the USA without an ITAR export licence. The only person I know to have fallen foul for the exporting of brass was someone who tried shipping four 55 gallon oil drums filled with once fired pistol brass. As you can imagine there was no way that he could argue that, that amount was for home loading.
No, a ruler used in the measuring of the case length is classed as associated equipment:
(3) All other components, parts, accessories, attachments and associated equipment for the articles in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this category.
Stupid I know, but these regulations are written so that a prosecution can be obtained with very little physical evidence and you are down to arguing the item's intended purpose.
Here's how U.S. law works.
In order to export rifles or handguns, or parts/components of rifles or handguns, or ammunition for rifles or handguns from the U.S., it is necessary to have an approved export permit, or "license", from our Directorate. The only ones who can apply for such a permit are those who fall into one of these three categories:
* U.S. Citizens,
* Permanent residents of the United States, or
* U.S. companies who are registered with our Directorate as exporters.
I am struggling to understand why anyone would risk it for such little saving. Even at a £1 a case that's cheep as chips it's not like you are going to save hundreds and hundreds of pound. And sending emails back and forth to a government department seems mad to I would like to think they have better things to do with there time seeming someone is pay tax to pay for ther time.
[h=3]Certain parts and accessories will be controlled in a category that permits their export to almost all countries without a license[/h]When ECR takes effect, stocks, grips, scope mounts, accessory rails, iron sights, sling swivels, butt plates, recoil pads, and bayonets will be authorized for export without a license, regardless of quantity or value, to all countries except Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Syria, China and any country subject to a U.N. embargo. (See proposed ECCN 0A501.y)