Favourite foxing calibre

Used a cheap little single shot NEF in .22 hornet for years and shot countless foxes with it, loved the thing and if i was going to be foxing again, i'd go for another Hornet.
 
Everyone will have their own favourite here and there really is no such thing as a bad calibre if used within the capabilities of the both rifle and shooter all will get the job done, my absolute favourite is the .17 Remington why ?, it has banjo string trajectory to 300yds and little or no recoil also it has really low ricochet potential I say low but not to be taken as non existence it needs the same respect as all calibres, I have shot many foxes over the years and believe me it is deadly.

Bad points are you do not have much choice of rifles or ammo out there you will need to reload to get the best from it, and build re-barrel an existing rifle to get up and running, some say its a barrel burner I am not so sure my current rifle a Remington 700 LVSF only just recently got a new tube after the old one had shot some 4000+ rounds and even then it still shot reasonably good groups.

Steve Kershaw replaced the old barrel with a LW50 light varmint barrel and boy does it shoot I have just coming up around the 100 rnd count and am sure it will last me for very many years thank you Steve you done a brilliant job sir.

My favourite bullet load combination are the Hornady 25grn v-max bullets superbly accurate and devastating on target, I have also had great success with Hornady/Berger 25grn HP bullets and the heavier Berger 30grn, but my bullet of choice are the 25grn v-max pushed along with Hodgdon Varget or Alliant RL15, I tend to keep my loads on the mild side around starting loads or just a little more I never go to maximum never exceed loads, they seem more accurate barrels last longer and it gives me a greater margin of safety.


Damian
 
.22 hornet. 40 grn SP Short range (100) and .222 35 grn v max long range (240).

:rolleyes: 240 ish on a day scope is long enough for me :oops: 180- 200 at night with ye olde photon is just right and doo able

Lovely calibres and rounds soon a 17 cf to be added. :)
 
Unless I am after Roe, I just use the .222 for literally everything these days. Corvids up to Munty.

The rabbits are gone, so the rimfires are used for the odd bit of target fun. Stalking rifle is what it is. I just shoot literally everything with the .222 these days.

Easy to moderate, costs same to reload as HMR is to buy, barrel and brass life is extensive and recoil is low with easy enough retention of sight picture to see bullet strikes. It is also beautifully light and great to carry. Ammo is light and easy to carry without sacrificing stopping power.

If noise and cost and component life were not important (and it is to me) then I would say it is hard to see past the .243 or 22-250 for the ultimate foxing round. I like the laser like ability of .17 and .20 cals but I prefer to chuck a bit more lead at Charles than that. I cannot recall the last time I shot a fox over 225yds. The .222rem does everything I need. Jack of all trades, master of none.
 
My current favourite is a CZ527 rebarreled with a varmint profiled barrel. Shoots very small holes with most bullets I’ve tried.
However I have a 20 TAC coming which I have a feeling will take its place as favourite.
I have used various other calibre’s 243 takes some beating especially as an all rounder.
 
.204 with 39 grn BK, laser like accuracy, quiet, no recoil and dumps all energy on target. Daytime using big Zeiss night with Drone.

Best thing since sliced bread.

D
 
Everyone will have their own favourite here and there really is no such thing as a bad calibre if used within the capabilities of the both rifle and shooter all will get the job done, my absolute favourite is the .17 Remington why ?, it has banjo string trajectory to 300yds and little or no recoil also it has really low ricochet potential I say low but not to be taken as non existence it needs the same respect as all calibres, I have shot many foxes over the years and believe me it is deadly.

Bad points are you do not have much choice of rifles or ammo out there you will need to reload to get the best from it, and build re-barrel an existing rifle to get up and running, some say its a barrel burner I am not so sure my current rifle a Remington 700 LVSF only just recently got a new tube after the old one had shot some 4000+ rounds and even then it still shot reasonably good groups.

Steve Kershaw replaced the old barrel with a LW50 light varmint barrel and boy does it shoot I have just coming up around the 100 rnd count and am sure it will last me for very many years thank you Steve you done a brilliant job sir.

My favourite bullet load combination are the Hornady 25grn v-max bullets superbly accurate and devastating on target, I have also had great success with Hornady/Berger 25grn HP bullets and the heavier Berger 30grn, but my bullet of choice are the 25grn v-max pushed along with Hodgdon Varget or Alliant RL15, I tend to keep my loads on the mild side around starting loads or just a little more I never go to maximum never exceed loads, they seem more accurate barrels last longer and it gives me a greater margin of safety.


Damian
I had one of, If not the first (10 twist barrel, not good.) 17 Rems. In the UK, bought off John Longstaffe in ‘72 i think, and over the years I nearly always had one.
I’ve had several slash wounds when hitting a fox rib or shoulder, not nice.
My prefered bullets were always Hornady sp. when I could no longer find those I bought a good stock of hp ones from Channing Nagel and they were brilliant. Not sure whether Chan. still makes bullets, seem to remember there was a problem getting jackets when Berger didn’t make enough J4s.
I used a 17 FB for few years and than was fine also for foxing. I think the slightly slower than 17 Rem speeds were sometimes an advantage,, helping bullets get inside before blowing up.
I seldom Fox now, but I think a 17 Fireball would be my choice, just because of the land I shoot foxes over.
17 Rem. a very good fox round, but, if you regularly shoot at longer distances, there are much better choices.
Ken.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top