It’s an EU law which makes it illegal to ship any such device without a power cable.
Good!
1) It is not only a safety measure to save lives so that appliances don't get connected to the mains electric with cabling or a plug that is inadequate for the current which is none one of the biggest causes of house fires...electrical issues. Indeed I doubt that any maker would be happy of the liability issues of a fire caused by their PC or kettle if it was used with a third party cable and plug. Their insurers would ty to deny liability.
It also stops the huge inconvenience of then having to buy a plug, connect the plug and etc.. Not everybody has a drawer of spare cables. Not everybody has the skill set if they don't have cables to then make one. I remember all the inconvenience and nuisance of sourcing a plug, finding the correct Phillips screwdriver, find the correct slot head screwdriver, then stripping the insulation from the cables to bare the wires to be attached.
-----
They’ve mandated a power reduction in vacuum cleaners. They thing this saves electricity. What it does do, is cause one to spend twice as long on the same cleaning.
Actually, like all such measures as the American regulations regarding minimum fuel efficiency measures in motor vehicles, this was designed to force manufacturers to develop more efficient machines that rely on 21st Century vacuuming technology and not simply use more and more power to drive inefficient 19th Century vacuuming technology. But being a Leicestershire Lad...the birthplace of Luddism...I do have to hold my hands up and I went out an bought two 2200 Watt cleaners before they disappeared from the shelves.
-----
!VAT on Electricity, gas and heating oil.
The EU did not impose VAT on electricity, gas, nor heating oil. It was zero rated. Who imposed it? It was one of Mrs Thatcher's Governments that imposed VAT on domestic energy bills. The EU didn't impose it. Mrs Thatcher was responsible for it.
-----
Red passports. Surely none of their business what colour a UK passport is? Oh, but the hidden agenda: the UK is just a province of the EU, and EU passports must be red.
No. Another falsehood. Again it was a UK Government that accepted that the "new" UK Passport would be red. There is no mandatory requirement that an EU Member State issue a red passport. Croatia's passport, a country that only recently joined the EU, is no red. It is blue. No member of the EU is forced to have a red passport. Nor did the UK have to accept a red passport.
-----
Or spend the money on making the existing lines and stations take double-decker trains. The Great Central Main Line - Wikipedia, closed by the Beeching report, could be reopened as a 120–130MPH line!
Fantasy. The bridges are not high enough. Indeed they cannot even electrify the Midland Mainline for that very reason. Great Central? The route never made a profit when it did exist either as a private company or as part of British Rail. And except where it still remains part of the current railway network into Marylebone Station (or as preserved heritage railway, doesn't exist. It would be impossible to resurrect most of it through Leicester or through Nottingham. Victoria Station no longer exists...it's a shopping centre...and all the bridges through the City of Leicester have long been demolished.
-----
Several cheeses formerly made with unpasteurized milk have been banned, supposedly on safety grounds, or rendered unprofitable by impossibly tough regulation.
Odd then that I can buy raw milk...lait cru...cheeses in every mainstream French supermarket.
-----
The common fisheries policy. It mandated that if fish of the wrong species were caught accidentally, the dead fish had to be thrown overboard, and the fishermen carried on killing more fish, until they reached the “right” quotas of the “right” species.
For obvious reasons. The same that if you fish on a pay by the fish trout water that don't offer catch and release. You can't throw back a fish you've caught and killed if you then catch a bigger and better one. Fraud. Fishing boat skippers would be tempted to actively target those more profitable species where the quota had already been filled and then try to claim that it was an error and that as they'd caught it they might therefore keep it and land it.
-----
At worst, in a smoke-filled room somewhere, they connived in a deception for the benefit of EU car-makers.
You're having a laugh. The UK car industry...Rover ex British Leyland...and Rootes Group failed for its own incompetences not because of the EU and the sole and only reason that the likes of Nissan and the Japanese and American makers have recently invested in the UK is because the UK is in the EU. I'll predict that post-Brexit there will be no more new car plants built by the Japanese, nor the Americans in the UK. Anyone that thinks that the British car industry's demise was not a self-inflicted death is blind to reality of the matter.
-----
It’s now illegal for a church fete to sell jam that’s not been poured into a brand-new jam-jar
More mischief. Read this from the EU: Here's a precis from 2012: Recent media coverage on reusing jars for homemade jams for sale at charity events certainly fired up the imagination of the headline writers: “EU elf ‘n safety tsars ban jam sales at fetes” and “anger spreads over EU fines threat for reusing old jam jars”, “EU fine for homemade jam makers”.
This is all completely untrue. There are no EU laws, new or old, which ban re-using old jam jars for fetes. The EU also has no powers to fine people.
Here's the actual link from 2012:
In a jam over non-existent EU rules - European Commission
-----
There may be a lot that isn't right with the EU. But it also isn't right that it should be scapegoated for what isn't its fault.