Lost mine a bit over a year ago now, she was 13 years old.
After speaking to a lot of shooting guys way more experienced than me I chose a lab x gsp bitch for ease of training and to slot into our family life (both of us doing shiftwork+3 young children) My first dog, she did everything asked of her with my basic training skills and her natural instincts.
Blood trailing, pigeon shooting, pheasant and even wildfowling on tidal water.
I learned more from her than she of me. Mostly she would stalk slightly ahead of me air scenting, when deer were spotted would drop behind with a finger click or slow handwave.
One morning out stalking, she focused ahead and gently leant on my leg quivering. I scanned the open ground and saw nothing thinking she had picked up a recent scent of deer. Must have been there a good while before two hidden fallow decided to break cover no more than 30 yrds away. One stopped and paid the price. I learned to trust her nose that day.
She made friends with everyone she met(no problem finding someone to look after her when away) never started trouble, excellent with well trained children, always had a naughty side especially where food was involved (usually our fault) There was the incident with a whole tray of disappearing defrosting meatballs, the disappearing tub of margarine, the swingbin lid escapade etc, etc, you get the idea. I let her retrieve the odd easy pheasant towards the end but mostly she slept for the last two years of her life.Hips and hearing went in the end.
I don't think you will regret it, I certainly dont
Make sure you keep us posted
I agree 100%. The problem with cross-breeding is that people imagine it is like mixing paint where you get an 'averaging' of the two breeds; whereas, in reality, it is more like shuffling two packs of cards together, chucking half of them away and then seeing what you have got left. The predictability of outcome for any given puppy is very poor and the variability within any litter is enormous. Some puppies will be copies of the dam; some just like the sire; and the rest a random combination of characteristics from each of the parents.Personally I wouldn't bother and stick with a straight lab, u have a far better idea wot u'll get.
I've. got a lab X wire cross and while he does the job he's nothing special either and doesn't do anything a lab wouldn't do.
I''d far rather have either a lab or wire over him
It is a complete lottery breeding or buying a puppy when pure bred and even more so breeding completely different types of dogs together,
Also would allow the genuinely decent dogs to cross breed them.
If ur bitch is decent most will always going to put it to a side of the same breed
Plus wot do udo if I have a great cross bred dog, wot/how do u breed it
Mongeral's can do a job but doubtful if ever come close to theparent breeds
I have a coulpe in my kennel now ( springerdor too) but I wouldn't buy 1 or choose to breed 1.
Couldn't agree moreI agree 100%. The problem with cross-breeding is that people imagine it is like mixing paint where you get an 'averaging' of the two breeds; whereas, in reality, it is more like shuffling two packs of cards together, chucking half of them away and then seeing what you have got left. The predictability of outcome for any given puppy is very poor and the variability within any litter is enormous. Some puppies will be copies of the dam; some just like the sire; and the rest a random combination of characteristics from each of the parents.
And this is where human optimism comes in (with pedigree dogs as well, but even more markedly so with mongrels). We assume that if we take two great dogs or breeds and cross them, the puppies will carry all of the great characteristics from each of the two dogs in order to produce a super-dog. This is unlikely. They are just as likely to take all of the terrible characteristics from each breed and combine them into a super-crap-dog; or - most likely of all - take some random combination of good and bad and shuffle them together to make an (unpredictably) average dog.
Breeding pedigree dogs (for performance; forget looks) is hard enough. To try and do it with crosses just makes it even harder.
Finally, there is a saying in the horse-racing world that 'champions rarely breed champions'. I think it is the same with dogs: most of the time we are just guessing as to what we are going to get.
Kind regards,
Carl
Here's my mate,
Apart from the basics taught to him the rest has come naturally,
He's my early warning system on the deer, and a demon when it comes to retrieving birds
KjfView attachment 123270
What a cracker!
How is he with the nose? Has he had to find any runners yet?
Cheers, Dan,
A very well written post from Carl, and the card shuffling ability is a good 1.
He so right about the horse/champion thing too, never heard that before.
But u do see it in a lot of well bred FT dogs often no where near the expectations.
Hybrid vigor only really applies to 1st gen crosses, there is research out there showing that often 2nd gen crosses have poorer health and shorter life spans.
I'm sure in a recent thread in the vet's section a vet was commenting on Montreal dogs having a genetic disease from a parent bred.
In the old days when Maff still had power they would come onto farms and sieze anything they thought was a cross bred bull..
U won't find any farmers using a cross bred male on there stock.
Breeding stock and dogs isn't that different.
Usually in these sort of threads u get the all breeds came from wolfs and were allmongerals at 1 point. Which is true
But the old breeders used to be ruthless, any pups/dogs which looked to have the bad traits even the wrong colour/size/shape would be PTS there and then.
1 off my biggest worries about actually wanting a cross would be the standard of the dogs being mated.
I'd imagine anyone training a bitch to a decent standard would want a pure bred pup to try to improve on her,, not take as complete lucky dip marring.
While accidents will happen and produce some very decent dogs not sure I'd search for 1