Why is everyone going on about scanning for the deer with the scope, if the beast has been checked on the binos, considered a possible shot, what is wrong with the checking the finger details with the scope with the mag cranked up abit?
Again - the over thinking thread comes to mind.
We have jumped from taking a closer look at a deer that was identified (assuming
it’s safe) with binoculars to the fact that someone can’t be trusted to not scan with the rifle - I have scanned with an air rifle as a young loon and it’s not easy or practical so you wouldn’t do it for long.
Come to Scotland in the winter and you don’t have to worry about all that crap, if it’s deer shaped we shoot it, no need to get all confused about bucks and does!![]()
If you cannot tell the sex of a deer with a set of 8x42 Bins then either it is well too far away, or it's sufficiently hidden by brush, twigs etc that it's an unsafe shot.
I would be a rifle to bear once I know that it is a potentially shootable beast and that it is a clear and safe shot. Then by all means take a good close look by zooming in, but to be honest if it is shootable range binoculars and 6x scope should be more than enough.
.... checking the finger details ....?
0h no its a hiker/ twitcher/ in brown bobble hat.deer there, cant tell what it is, scope has more mag.. oh its a *insert relevant deer sex / species etc*
If you cant see the target properly dont point the rifle, if you cant see the target properly you also cant see the backstop properly either.