The attack on the production of food as the primary reason for shooting game is directly linked to the idea that if our "food" is full of lead it can not be commercially viable and therefore the justification for shooting is removed.
My point was that there is no evidence lead in bullets is harmful, either to those eating what was shot using them or to the environment. It is an assumption that is deemed to be self evident. And the whole theme of "lead in the food chain" is hung on the peg of "damaging the environment", another button to push in opposition to the shooting sports.
My other point, however, is that you will not see any (serious) opposition to this from the gun trade, for the reasons I laid out...
GK
A simple picture showing for example a 308 - 130 grains bullet View attachment 170893 Tri zones for the new pythagorian expansion (easily visibles by zooming the image)
CNC machined - tolerance 1 micrometer copper and tip (also machined, NOT injected).
A thing of beauty...!
But a barrel twist of 1:12 is really just sufficient to stabilise this bullet, which is the standard twist for a 308 Win. That means that this 130 grain bullet is really the heaviest that can be considered commercially viable for the hunting market - and you have to ask yourself if it is heavy enough for anything but short range pest control?
I know that makers of monoliths in Scandinavia are struggling because of lack of take-up. I know several people here in the UK who have looked at entering this market, but who reluctantly decided that it was was not profitable - yet.
I wish you luck on this venture...
GK



