He may well have been fitted up, but he probably did do everything his accusers said he did.He reckons he was 'fitted -up' and she perjured herself in parliament. No love lost there now.
The parliamentary enquiry which he sought has ruled against hearing most of his critical evidence so he's going public and has credible support for believing a case of sexual harassment of which he was acquitted unanimously was 'created and pursued to destroy him. Or something like that it'll all be in the papers soon anyway !
Sorry, my mistake, I missed out the critical words 'allegedly' twice here., although he was acquitted in court unanimously - whatever that may mean.
The widespread corruption of many elements within the Scottish Political Establishment, Paul - the actual spat is pointing this out, but many haven’t yet considered the wider implications for Scottish society;So what’s this most of this salmond/sturgeon thing In layman’s terms ?
I know he was acquitted of sex pest type stuff......thought those two were pally ?
Paul
And the rest, surely! Don’t you think all who conspired in his attempted downfall should equally be held to account/equally face justice??He reckons he was 'fitted -up' and she perjured herself in parliament. No love lost there now.
The parliamentary enquiry which he sought has ruled against hearing most of his critical evidence so he's going public and has credible support for believing a case of sexual harassment of which he was acquitted unanimously was 'created and pursued to destroy him. Or something like that it'll all be in the papers soon anyway !
Sorry, my mistake, I missed out the critical words 'allegedly' twice here., although he was acquitted in court unanimously - whatever that may mean.
It may well be so Bruce, but just because the corruption collusion and conspiracy aren’t looked for, it does neither mean it did not happen nor that they will be dogged by such matters until they are fully considered in turn? Do we not expect better from those we pay for in the upper parts of society, and for which we pay?He may well have been fitted up, but he probably did do everything his accusers said he did.
I can't see the whole truth coming out - the inquiry committee simply doesn't have the legal powers to make that happen.
The parallel with Trump is interesting - he was by far the worst US president in history- a lazy incompetent lying narcissist - yet 74 million people voted for him, and if he hadn't screwed up covid as badly as he did , he would still be president.
It doesn't matter how badly this goes for fattie and Krankie, the SNP will still rake in the votes at the next election.
Like the MAGA mob, the SNP voters are essentially members of a cult
Cheers
I see the SNP want to investigate Donald Trump's finances (in Scotland)
I trust Westminster will investigate the SNP's finances and look at where the SNP have been stashing the money that Westminster has sent them.
That will be a can of worms well worth opening![]()
Actually, they very quickly fell out after the golf course in Aberdeenshire was built and further schemes of Trump's were vetoed. Trump, as usual, took the huff when he didn't get his own way.That's odd, because the SNP were leading supporters of Trump's schemes in Scotland. How conveniently forgetful of them.
Actually, they very quickly fell out after the golf course in Aberdeenshire was built and further schemes of Trump's were vetoed. Trump, as usual, took the huff when he didn't get his own way.
Your wording suggested, to me, that everything was rosy between both camps until this investigation, I merely clarified that it was not.They still welcomed him with open arms and interfered in the proper processes to advantage him. It's a matter of record. The fact that they changed their mind after the rest of the told them Trump was a tool does nothing to alter their poor judgment and misdeeds.
Aye and I am sure that no thick, brown, dollar-shaped envelopes ever changed ownership either!They still welcomed him with open arms and interfered in the proper processes to advantage him. It's a matter of record. The fact that they changed their mind after the rest of the told them Trump was a tool does nothing to alter their poor judgment and misdeeds.
My apologies. I intended to convey that they'd been only too keen to welcome Trump - inappropriately keen - regardless of what their later opinions were once it was made clear to them that the rest of the world thought Trump was a tool. I certainly didn't intend to convey any suggestion that the SNP wouldn't ditch any previous conviction if they saw an electoral advantage in it.Your wording suggested, to me, that everything was rosy between both camps until this investigation, I merely clarified that it was not.
Excellent - do lets continue this pugilistic theme (she does look like she has caught more than a few straight jabs after all) - a la “Thriller in Manilla” and “Rumble in the Jungle”! Can I offer “Died on the Clyde”?I viewed this thread given the title in the hope it was a video of the pair of them in a boxing ring![]()