Whitefront
Well-Known Member
No logical reason why UK raptors would react differently to the same species in Europe. See references 21, 26 and 31 at end of this briefing:
[/URL]
[/URL]
Last edited:
650 murders a year in UK. So, if somebody decided to murder a dozen more people, it doesn't count... ?
We don't need to use lead ammo for hunting. Not anymore. I don't.
Agreed, birds don't have death certificates. Hence scientists make estimates, to suite their agenda.
And what would the GWCT's agenda be?
wildjustice.org.uk
No one is going to argue lead is not toxic (most things are toxic if enough is ingested, including copper). But we should be basing a UK ban on UK data, we don’t have the same species as America, condors are not an issue for us.Theres probably not much UK specific data, you ( the UK) didn’t go looking for it, but the American and European data is valid in the UK, and that data is conclusive, lead shrapnel/small shot kills raptors when ingested, which is why your local falconer wont take birds shot with it.
The wildfowl trust did produce some pretty damning results for ducks, geese and lead shot ingestion too.
The effects of lead toxicity doesn’t change from country to country so they aren’t UK specific and even if they were, wildfowl are migratory, so enter the Birds Directive, so you may not poison “ our” birds while they’re in the UK.
Every single country in the EU tried to argue that in their case lead wasn’t an issue, not one of them could show valid evidence to support their case.
I’m not interested in re-hashing old and discredited arguments, lead is toxic, we’re going to lose it.
I just hope for some compromise where viable alternatives don’t exist.
Just to clarify, I’m not a member of or a supporter of BASC, I’m in NARGC and I’ve been following this subject since the mid 70’s, we’ve managed to stall the process towards a ban but we’ve never been able to counter the scientific evidence, that’s why BASC went the voluntary ban road, they’ve no choice..
Taken from the same paper, although it deals almost entirely with wildfowl.No logical reason why UK raptors would react differently to the same species in Europe. See references 21, 26 and 31 at end of this briefing:
[/URL]
Saving obscene large bag game days by throwing other shooting sports under the bus ……And what would the GWCT's agenda be?
What quarry species do you shoot out of interest?650 murders a year in UK. So, if somebody decided to murder a dozen more people, it doesn't count... ?
We don't need to use lead ammo for hunting. Not anymore. I don't.
I’ll turn your question around.No one is going to argue lead is not toxic (most things are toxic if enough is ingested, including copper). But we should be basing a UK ban on UK data, we don’t have the same species as America, condors are not an issue for us.
If so many raptors are dying from lead shot game why are we not finding them in numbers?
Why has there been a huge surge in buzzard and red kite numbers in the last 20-30 years? Both birds are principally scavengers, more so than other common UK raptors, if lead shot carrion was of any consequence to populations they would not be growing.
Outside of the food chain, wetlands, and probably big game shoots, would a lead ban really be of benefit? Certainly a blanket ban on all environments for target and clays, for vermin and foxes would seem totally disproportionate, yet that is exactly what we are facing!
But as was pointed out above the UK is no longer part of the EU.I’ll turn your question around.
We know that lead impacts raptors in other countries and in captivity, what evidence do you have that wild raptors in the UK are not affected by it?
You’re right about the surge in numbers, 30 years ago we had no buzzards, nowadays the suckers are everywhere and lets not deny that part of that increase is down to far fewer being killed, I’ve found 2 dead buzzards since Christmas, plus curlew,Brent goose and a mute swan besides, short of a post-mortem we’ll never know what happened to them but dead birds are definitely out there if you go looking.
I don’t know whether the ban will achieve anything concrete, probably very little at best but its coming, its EU policy and shooting is a soft target, we’ve no friends at court, we’re at the end of the road.
Thats just my assessment of where we stand, I don’t like it particularly but I’ll see where it impacts me and adapt accordingly.
Its that or give up and I won’t give up as long as theres viable ammunition available.
I bloody wish!So that was a "once in 15 years" experience then?
Lee, what are your not understanding?More pages and pages of the same jibber jabber
Now is the time to get your head around it, sort your selves out and get on with it.
It will happen, there is nothing we or anyone can do about it so prepare yourselves the best you can and crack on.
What the heck has your membership of the EU got to do with lead ingestion and toxicity?But as was pointed out above the UK is no longer part of the EU.
Yes, less raptors are being killed but if lead poisoning was an issue at population level then numbers would not be increasing…..
My point about Brexit is we should be able to make our own rules, we are not bound by the EU’s rules.What the heck has your membership of the EU got to do with lead ingestion and toxicity?
The effects of lead poisoning don’t just suddenly manifest themselves or vanish as birds cross the midpoint of the channel.
Its totally reasonable to deduce that similar birds will display similar symptoms and effects from exposure to the same element regardless of geography.
You‘re also still bound by the Birds Directive, so you’re required to protect them.
The argument that every single state, county and parish is geographically unique and that the effects of a universally acknowledged toxin has to be proved in each and every case is a pretty poor one.
We tried it, it didn’t go well.