They are pushing an agenda with the aim to taking over firearms licensing ££££££.
Before answering is this thread featuring on your podcast?Is it my imagination or is BASC seemingly and suddenly getting openly abrasive with police firearms licensing?
Genuinely interested as my own FAC variation journey (The first half of 2022) motivated me to start podcasting on the topic.....
Also to meet East Hants MP, Hants&IoW - PCC/Senior Police/Head of FAC Dept.....etc
Is this driven by a genuine 8% drop in licenses being the fault of police firearms licensing departments?
- Or have we simply not seen licensing catch up yet?
Is there an associated loss of BASC members alongside the UK license numbers?
Ergo, it has become a higher priority for BASC?
Just a question, I have no idea but something appears to have changed radically at BASC HQ
Is it something else?
Do you think this stance will help or hinder us?
The idea is to win without going into court . The Police will take it to the wire but will eventually settle on the court steps before entering . A loss in court over a point means they are highly likely to loose any further case of the like ( even if it doesn't become a precedent officially, it is by default ) . BTW BASC now have a special fund to fight any such cases for this very reason .Well I would hardly call it a blasting .
I’ve heard a harsher telling off from a mother to a toddler
Our shooting orgs have have no teeth at all , it’s all nothing but mouthing off and lip service.
BASC have never taken on , defended and won a legal case since its inception .
It is what it is .
The last review was 2014, with increases in 2015 - so this will be a 2022 review with a likely 2023 increases.There was a chat between the Police and BASC recently where the Police were at fault (I apologise for not remembering detail) and the conclusion was there was "no need to go to war over it".
I would like to see BASC go to war with good intent but its as likely as finding an ice cream at the coop in this temperature.
Could be they are feeling the pinch and that would also be a good thing, as it might call into question the value of BASC's strategies, and the stale taste of its press releases.
Instead of what is said above (note 2014, now 2022) BASC and others should state quite explicitly that the laughable 'service' received by shooters is an embarrassment when consistency should be driven by a National Guidance in the name of Public Safety and which is not open to interpretation. Levels of service delivered in this area should be part of a Chief Constables performance assessment for annual reviews of his position by the inspectorate from HO, feeding into the wider review.
Remember the attempts to stifle ACPO - Teresa Mays personal battle with a rebellious pack of Chief Constables ? If you don't 'go to war' you will not win any concessions to logic and fairness.
I'm getting more convinced you are a BASC plant!Yes, chaotic due to COVID but not as bad as police FLDs at the moment. So which is easier, getting just one organisation to improve or all 43 different ones?
I had one done in 20 minutes by Wilts' the week before last . . . .South Wales have had my variation 8 weeks today - was told last week it hasn’t been looked at yet and at least 20 others before mine will be considered- will be lucky to get it before my DSC1 in October at this rate
Before answering is this thread featuring on your podcast?
By fight , do you mean like play fight , where you roll over and wait for your belly to be tickled ?BASC is continuing to fight for improvements in firearms licensing
Or you could get a great deal on insurance, with legal cover from Country cover club, for £33 , and let BASC keep their 150 staff, and glossy mag full of adverts ?Perhaps Basc aught to consider consulting its members about it and reinstate this part of the insurance, even if it involved a modest membership price increase. I would be willing to pay a reasonable premium on my membership for this.
There are a few on here. when they are trying to tell us all that BASC are the voice of shooting when in actual fact all shooter are a voice that have a say in the future of our sport.I'm getting more convinced you are a BASC plant!
Also perhaps now in their future representation, which may be a bit better than currently ? BASC's efforts resulted in the medical issue which they did NOT challenge nd still have not prperly accounted for that failing hence my comment below.There are a few on here. when they are trying to tell us all that BASC are the voice of shooting when in actual fact all shooter are a voice that have a say in the future of our sport.
I think that Basc made a big mistake in dropping the part of the insurance that would fund and defend a members case to court level against a police force,
Perhaps Basc aught to consider consulting its members
Reinstate this part of the insurance, even if it involved a modest membership price increase. I would be willing to pay a reasonable premium on my membership for this.
Test cases are all well and good, but you have to winMaybe BASC should fund a test case or 2 challenging the gross inefficiency and ineptness of those charged with issueing tickets??
To win you at least have to try.Test cases are all well and good, but you have to win

Not quite as simple as that is it with legal issues? Precedents being set etc etc. lose one case, lose all subsequent similar cases.To win you at least have to try.![]()
So we remain in Groundhog day situation ....Not quite as simple as that is it with legal issues? Precedents being set etc etc. lose one case, lose all subsequent similar cases.
It might reply in kind and ask if you have any connection with animal aid & the gun control network, but that would be sinking to your level wouldn't it?I'm getting more convinced you are a BASC plant!