Non Toxic advice?

Three or four shots should be sufficient. Sight it 1 and bit inches high and don’t worry about drops till well past 200.

Terrible advice, failing to test ammunition that you plan to use at ranges beyond 100m is pure negligence.

200...? Yards? feet? Inches?

I have used Federal Power Shok Copper .270 for work and the amount of drop witnessed from 100m to 200m and beyond was simply unacceptable. Not measured in inches but feet.

Blowing the front leg off a deer that you can't follow up on will likely see the day ending with 'Don't come back'.
 
Gents, I’m needing some suggestions if possible please?

I’ve slightly come a cropper. I’ve booked a days stalking next week and loaded up a batch of home loads which always takes a bit of time. It turns out that the estate is non toxic only so I’m a tad late in finding this out.

Which of the following brands would you recommend? Purely looking at bushwear because it’s central / handy.

I prefer to use my own rifle from a confidence view but then that changes with new ammo anyway.

I can’t decide whether to grab one of the recommend boxes available and try them out on the target on the day,(seems a bit hectic but difficult to test before then). Or just use the estate rifle.


If anyone can recommend any of the below ammo for reliability,(appreciate no guarantees it’ll shoot well in my particular rifle) I may pick up a box in the hope that I can squeeze a target session in prior to the big day.


Cheers!
One of my shooting buddies (also am RFD) is using the S&B to good effect in his creedmoor
 
We tried some SandB in a creedmore - after 2 boxes gave up
Back to lead and back to within inch
The copper ones were literally all over with the odd one not even hitting the paper - most odd
shot over previous lead fowling perhaps ? A creedmore would generally have 1-8 twist and would be fine with any matching copper round. Many have reported lead and copper fouling dont mix ( though it isnt something i should ever do personally ) , even mixing various lead loads isnt something i am keen on ( though it might not matter it still messes with my head ).
I assure you copper shoots very, very well as regards accuracy if you have the right twist for the bullets used
 
Yes we did shoot it over lead - but it was astonishing how wild it was
Then back to lead and happy again

I am sure copper is ok but i was just trying to emphasise that rushing out buying some cartridges and then expecting them to perform is not always reality and time and trial are required
 
Terrible advice, failing to test ammunition that you plan to use at ranges beyond 100m is pure negligence.

200...? Yards? feet? Inches?

I have used Federal Power Shok Copper .270 for work and the amount of drop witnessed from 100m to 200m and beyond was simply unacceptable. Not measured in inches but feet.

Blowing the front leg off a deer that you can't follow up on will likely see the day ending with 'Don't come back'.
We will agree ti disagree. I did suggest make sure he can the estate rifle is available. God alone knows what copper bullets you have been trying but my experience using Fox Classic is very very different. They shoot very tight groups and no drop worth speaking of at 200 with sights set an inch high at 100.

And any good stalker with client who is not 100% certain of his rifle would make sure his guest gets in close before taking a shot. After all that is the skill and thrill of the stalk.
 
It’s funny, definitely a trend on here that several folk love one brand and others hate it. Good to get real feedback though!



I think ultimately one load makes sense, I’ve enough lead to keep me going for the short term and we’ll see how the non toxic legislation pans out.. Frankly I’d be happy if lead stuck but I think the retail / meat market says otherwise.



.270 sir. Very helpful. Barney’s TSX certainly seems to be one of the mainstays for non lead. Thanks!



Handy to know! There’s been several pro Winchester posts and then one negative about slow kills which is rather off putting
Slow! Not what I’ve found, Good round apart from the size of the exit hole
 
Have you mentioned what your rifle is? That would be first thing I added to be helpful as someone with same rifle can save you a lot of money testing ammunition and just tell you what brand of copper it shoots well
It’s a sako 75. To be honest I thought even individual rifles may vary in bullet preference but it’s a fair point!
Terrible advice, failing to test ammunition that you plan to use at ranges beyond 100m is pure negligence.

200...? Yards? feet? Inches?

I have used Federal Power Shok Copper .270 for work and the amount of drop witnessed from 100m to 200m and beyond was simply unacceptable. Not measured in inches but feet.

Blowing the front leg off a deer that you can't follow up on will likely see the day ending with 'Don't come back'.

I can see both sides of this. Agree bullet drop should be tested further out and I would always do this with my home loaded ammo. But I’m fairly sure most estates will just check you’re comfortable at 100m then go. Sometimes I’ve been told to hold 1” high or what have you but generally it’s a dinner plate sized target within the rifles maximum point blank range.

One of my shooting buddies (also am RFD) is using the S&B to good effect in his creedmoor

Thanks, the S&B certainly seems popular!
 
Terrible advice, failing to test ammunition that you plan to use at ranges beyond 100m is pure negligence.

200...? Yards? feet? Inches?

I have used Federal Power Shok Copper .270 for work and the amount of drop witnessed from 100m to 200m and beyond was simply unacceptable. Not measured in inches but feet.

Blowing the front leg off a deer that you can't follow up on will likely see the day ending with 'Don't come back'.
1” high @ 100m/yds has served me well for almost 2 decades over 4 different calibres.

If you do enough, you know what your rifle and ammunition can do!

@Heym SR20 maybe you and i are too rustic for the SD purists amongst the congregation 🙈😂
 
Terrible advice, failing to test ammunition that you plan to use at ranges beyond 100m is pure negligence.

200...? Yards? feet? Inches?

I have used Federal Power Shok Copper .270 for work and the amount of drop witnessed from 100m to 200m and beyond was simply unacceptable. Not measured in inches but feet.

Blowing the front leg off a deer that you can't follow up on will likely see the day ending with 'Don't come back'.
if your talking (feet of drop) as stated from 100 to just 200 , those rounds should be returned to the dealer forthwith , the chance of them being deer legal is slim at best . its a 270 for pities sake even a 22 hornet should be able to make 200 yards from a 100 zero without being a full foot low i am 4" low at 200 with a 140 zero with the hornet .
However copper ( all copper) will shed energy a lot faster than lead and windages you might not allow for with regular copper jacketed lead need consideration , drops ? not really at 200 with hart lung shots from one of the fastest none magnum deer cartridges when you have a 100 zero, 300 yards? yeah should be corrected to top edge of the kill zone, not feet though
A visit to the chronograph seems in order here and return of the ammo because that a way off normal and should be investigated , the next one could end up a squib because that really sounds like a manufacturing error
 
1” high @ 100m/yds has served me well for almost 2 decades over 4 different calibres.

If you do enough, you know what your rifle and ammunition can do!

@Heym SR20 maybe you and i are too rustic for the SD purists amongst the congregation 🙈😂
Agreed, and if you look at the published load data for most factory lead free loads the ballistics are pretty much the same as an old lead load out to 300m with similar drops, terminal velocity and retained energy.

If you use the point blank range methadology provided you are within 250 a centre hold will put a bullet into the vitals and if its a little further hold at the top of the kill zone. And if its really windy - you should be able to get in closer so wind deflection is not an issue.

And you can do all of this with a 6x42 and no twiddly turrets.
 
Agreed, and if you look at the published load data for most factory lead free loads the ballistics are pretty much the same as an old lead load out to 300m with similar drops, terminal velocity and retained energy.

If you use the point blank range methadology provided you are within 250 a centre hold will put a bullet into the vitals and if its a little further hold at the top of the kill zone. And if its really windy - you should be able to get in closer so wind deflection is not an issue.

And you can do all of this with a 6x42 and no twiddly turrets.
Used a fixed 8x56 schmidt for 15 odd years only just in the last few years, gone over to variable so so when you shop I fixed mags scope for that long inch high works!
 
Agreed, and if you look at the published load data for most factory lead free loads the ballistics are pretty much the same as an old lead load out to 300m with similar drops, terminal velocity and retained energy.

If you use the point blank range methadology provided you are within 250 a centre hold will put a bullet into the vitals and if its a little further hold at the top of the kill zone. And if its really windy - you should be able to get in closer so wind deflection is not an issue.

And you can do all of this with a 6x42 and no twiddly turrets.
in practice they are not equal to lead ballistics , when you actually shoot them on paper . how can they be when comparing lead and copper ? simlar to steel and lead are not the same . The lighter projectile material slows down first in both copper bullets and steel pellets , almost like hitting a wall as they shed velocity . that doesn't mean they are particularly bad , just you have to understand it and allow . I really notice the difference at 300 yards as compared to 100 in expansion , trajectory and windage , needs consideration 100 grain lead 243 against 260 rem 100 copper
 
in practice they are not equal to lead ballistics , when you actually shoot them on paper . how can they be when comparing lead and copper ? simlar to steel and lead are not the same . The lighter projectile material slows down first in both copper bullets and steel pellets , almost like hitting a wall as they shed velocity . that doesn't mean they are particularly bad , just you have to understand it and allow . I really notice the difference at 300 yards as compared to 100 in expansion , trajectory and windage , needs consideration 100 grain lead 243 against 260 rem 100 copper
So just pulled a couple of boxes of ammo out.

7x57 300 yd drops with a zero at around 200yds.

Fox Classic Hunter with 130gn is 9.8 inches, Hornady 140gn Softpoint is 9.1 inches.


243 Winchester at 300m

100gn RWS Softpoint is 24.6cm, Fox 80gn is 23.1

And 7x65r with 140gn RWS HIT bullet is 24.5 cm at 300m.

All the above with close to 200m zero.

Copper is not that light - it has about 80% of the density of lead. But with a lead bullet the jacket which is probably 25% is also copper, so a monolithic copper bullet is 90% the weight of a lead core bullet.

And given the driving bands it has less surface area, thus friction in the barrel so for the same pressure will be launched a bit faster so will be launched with substantially more energy. Energy is the square of velocity. So at 300m they will still have pretty much the same energy and be slowing at a similar rate.
 
Last edited:
So just pulled a couple of boxes of ammo out.

7x57 300 yd drops with a zero at around 200yds.

Fox Classic Hunter with 130gn is 9.8 inches, Hornady 140gn Softpoint is 9.1 inches.


243 Winchester at 300m

100gn RWS Softpoint is 24.6cm, Fox 80gn is 23.1

And 7x65r with 140gn RWS HIT bullet is 24.5 cm at 300m.

All the above with close to 200m zero.
It doesn’t really matter what calibre you shoot, you are going to be dropping somewhere between 8 and 18 inches in 300 yards, I know my 270 drops 12 inches at 300 m, zeroed 1 inch high at 100 once you know that crack on
 
It doesn’t really matter what calibre you shoot, you are going to be dropping somewhere between 8 and 18 inches in 300 yards, I know my 270 drops 12 inches at 300 m, zeroed 1 inch high at 100 once you know that crack on
Quite, and with most calibres not a lot of variation between a copper and lead core bullet in terms of drops. But many on SD think that copper bullets are rather like throwing ping pong balls. Funny how many are now using copper bullets for long range target shooting, and long range hunting.
 
So just pulled a couple of boxes of ammo out.

7x57 300 yd drops with a zero at around 200yds.

Fox Classic Hunter with 130gn is 9.8 inches, Hornady 140gn Softpoint is 9.1 inches.


243 Winchester at 300m

100gn RWS Softpoint is 24.6cm, Fox 80gn is 23.1

And 7x65r with 140gn RWS HIT bullet is 24.5 cm at 300m.

All the above with close to 200m zero.
such a mixed bag data wise , if this is packet data i should disregard it . it needs shooting
 
such a mixed bag data wise , if this is packet data i should disregard it . it needs shooting
I have shot it. Admittedly I don’t shoot deer at 300 yards or metres. I have shot deer at that distance, and I know that ****s ups rise exponentially with distance. At 200 they all work well and no change to hold is needed.

On the range at longer distances I haven’t noticed the copper to drop any more or less than comparable bullets.
 
I have shot it. Admittedly I don’t shoot deer at 300 yards or metres. I have shot deer at that distance, and I know that ****s ups rise exponentially with distance. At 200 they all work well and no change to hold is needed.

On the range at longer distances I haven’t noticed the copper to drop any more or less than comparable bullets.
depends what you compare of course but less weight for a given size is not as effective at holding energy. I shoot 100 TTSX at 3200 fps from the 260 rem and can tell you its hits a wall about 250 and drops a little more than a 100 grain 243 lead bullet . But a do really like how these TTSX work and would go back , none the less they are good to 400 when conditions play nice and still expand through its obviously less than they will at 200 yards . Weight retention has always been 100% unless i loose one of the petals at any range and you dont get that with lead plus is no toxic fragments sprayed through the meat and less jelly shoulders .
 
Back
Top