timbrayford
Well-Known Member
Not so, it is the establishment and the general public who benefits, and in all fairness they should shoulder the cost!No one benefits!
Not so, it is the establishment and the general public who benefits, and in all fairness they should shoulder the cost!No one benefits!
GwentCould those people who have responded saying their 'experience has been great', please provide the county they live in? It would be interesting to see if individuals that live within the same county are experiencing different outcomes.
Thanks
Not so, it is the establishment and the general public who benefits, and in all fairness they should shoulder the cost!
Yes no way does the price of the certificate cover the cost of the admistration of the process. In addition the licensing does more than just grants renewals and variations.Loosing money hand over fist!
I certainly wouldn’t want to take it on as i viable business thats for sure, you would be bankrupt before your first 5. Years was up!
Therefore it makes no difference whether we pay a fair price or a king's ransom. What is imperative is that we stop all this rear guard reactive stuff and start challenging the popular assumptions that the antis promote that have hitherto gone unchallenged.the establishment and the public could vote to stop publicly owned gun if they wanted within a click of the fingers!
It will only take another public shooting from a legal gun owner and shite will proper hit the fan and that wi be the end of it!
What do you mean is 10 visits not better than 3. Not all holders require a visit just as many are done over the phone.But who benefits?
CumbriaCould those people who have responded saying their 'experience has been great', please provide the county they live in? It would be interesting to see if individuals that live within the same county are experiencing different outcomes.
Thanks
The Firearms Act places a number of duties on Chiefs of Police, amongst which are that the applicant must be "fit to be entrusted with a firearm" and not "a danger to public safety and the peace". No one asked the shooting community whether Michael Ryan, Thomas Hamilton, or Jake Davison amongst others should lawfully possess firearms, those decisions were absolutely made by their respective FLDs, so why should the law-abiding shooting community be held responsible for these most serious of mistakes made by grossly incompetent public servants?It will only take another public shooting from a legal gun owner and shite will proper hit the fan and that will be the end of it!
People like to chop and change, what’s wrong with that. Renewal is a good time to get additional authorities as they are included in the cost. I don’t think you are right either way, mine isn’t needed for work, though they know I am a very active shooter. But I did add 4 authorities to posses and change some ammunition around, still sorted in 8 weeks.I might be wrong but are there two queues at the firearms department,mine went through very easily as I use mine for my work and don't " chop and change " my guns and just want to get out and shoot.
and possibly another one for the ones who want to change guns and calibers on a frequent basis thus causing a backlog.
in my previous trade if you were a constant mitherer you got put to the back of the list.
I've found them to be a bit curate's egg in the past but recently they've appointed a helpful FEO with bags of commonsense so hopefully the improvement will continue.Thanks to those who responded to my post. Interesting that none of the Southern Counties were mentioned. Hampshire not doing very well at all by all accounts but I have always found them great to deal with in the past. Lets see how long it takes for my variation to come through!
I have now been waiting some 15 months for an FAC grant. Had an email in September saying they could not tell me when l may get my case processed and l may get an update in 3 months (January 23) but am not holding my breath.I went out Christmas Eve in Norwich with the Mrs, and I spent more money in 3 hours than my FAC/SGC costs for 5 years, now do you get more point that the service is unjustifiable at the present price range that it is charged at?
So really, it comes down to the point of you, either wait and be patient, or you have to pay more to get a better service
I think it has all recently gone pear shaped in Canada, sweeping changes in legislation on what can be owned and restricting new purchases etc .I have now been waiting some 15 months for an FAC grant. Had an email in September saying they could not tell me when l may get my case processed and l may get an update in 3 months (January 23) but am not holding my breath.
Getting tired of told to be patient, our fire arms laws are far too complex, we need a model like Canada and the process should be with one authority like Scotland, not a mish mash of self interested Chief of Police and pointless, ineffective PCCs.
May be they should relax some checks to get the backlog cleared?
The firearms laws have nothing to do with licensing. In regards to relaxing this will not happen I expect it to get more stringent. We still haven't received the iopc report from the Plymouth incident or had the coronors inquest. I suspect that this will have a major impact on the policy and procedures.I have now been waiting some 15 months for an FAC grant. Had an email in September saying they could not tell me when l may get my case processed and l may get an update in 3 months (January 23) but am not holding my breath.
Getting tired of told to be patient, our fire arms laws are far too complex, we need a model like Canada and the process should be with one authority like Scotland, not a mish mash of self interested Chief of Police and pointless, ineffective PCCs.
May be they should relax some checks to get the backlog cleared?
If the public sector had been more honest about their culpability for Dunblane instead of the 100 year cover up further mass shootings might have been avoidedThe firearms laws have nothing to do with licensing. In regards to relaxing this will not happen I expect it to get more stringent. We still haven't received the iopc report from the Plymouth incident or had the coronors inquest. I suspect that this will have a major impact on the policy and procedures.