Do you think that the current shooting test for the DSC1 qualification is suitable or sufficient?

Do you think that the current shooting test for the DSC1 qualification is suitable or sufficient?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
If I remember correctly, two failed the shooting test when I was there, one a stalker with previous experiece on the 10-20m HD shot and one a serving soldier who failed on the 100m
 
Some of the guys on the shooting test were only 5mill outside the circle and failed.
So as VSS as put both DSC and a mentor works well together and have to agree with him it worked for me.
On the shooting test why cant we have an outer circle as a pass as it would still be a kill.
That is ridiculous…5mm outside the circle the assessor should be using his discretion.
 
I wonder if there is a way to get the 3D model of a game like Call of the Wild (which has some anatomical details). I'm sure you could get some very informative images of different shot placement (such as from above/neck shots ect).
 
Because with any test you have to set the line somewhere - if you move the outer line there will be someone 5mm outside of that who will feel hard done by.
The standard set is not a hard one to obtain, especially with modern rifles, optics and quadsticks.
Why can the trainer assessor/instructor not tell if a shot is a heart/lung etc? They assess the simulated stalk so no reason they can’t do the same on the shooting test.
 
Why can the trainer assessor/instructor not tell if a shot is a heart/lung etc? They assess the simulated stalk so no reason they can’t do the same on the shooting test.
There would end up being discrepancies in where assessors judged the heart/lung area to be. It ensures ensure the test is objective, rather than subjective, where possible preventing problems such as bias (conscious or unconscious) from assessors, difference in opinion, accusations of unfair conduct etc.

I also don't understand why there is the desire to make the test even easier? It is by no means a very exacting standard of marksmanship required currently. The old test, while being slightly harder was still a very easy test to pass with a basic ability to shoot.

Ben
 
That is ridiculous…5mm outside the circle the assessor should be using his discretion.
It's a test with a standard that has to be equally applied across the country.
How much discretion then? Where do you stop? Can you imagine 2 candidates, one 5mm out PASS. The other 7mm out FAIL?
It would end with handbags at dawn.
 
I was able to kill deer safely and legaly before it was invented after completing it yes a few additional points learned but nothing fundamentally changed
 
There would end up being discrepancies in where assessors judged the heart/lung area to be. It ensures ensure the test is objective, rather than subjective, where possible preventing problems such as bias (conscious or unconscious) from assessors, difference in opinion, accusations of unfair conduct etc.

I also don't understand why there is the desire to make the test even easier? It is by no means a very exacting standard of marksmanship required currently. The old test, while being slightly harder was still a very easy test to pass with a basic ability to shoot.

Ben
Why is it any different to being subjective on the simulated stalk?

If the instructors are trusted to mark a test etc why can they not assess a target?
 
It's a test with a standard that has to be equally applied across the country.
How much discretion then? Where do you stop? Can you imagine 2 candidates, one 5mm out PASS. The other 7mm out FAIL?
It would end with handbags at dawn.
So again - why is that any different to them assessing the simulated stalk? Do we not trust the instructors?
 
So who would store this info? The police, the firearm holder, the lease holder?
What happens if you move home or move to a different lease. Who verifies the results and would they be held accountable if on the next lease the stalker doesn’t preform as the lease holder expects - after all buddies could verify for each other and then move on or fall out which introduces another issue.

Bearing in mind that this costs money and people are already complaining about the cost of FACs going up.
My 2P is if they put cost up to £500 a ticket or flat £500 for both if renewed at same time. It wouldn’t bother me at all as let’s face it it’s only £100/year. And within that cost they (police) set a contract with for the like of the mid west with wms firearms todo a basic firearm safe handling course what they (wms) then notify the relivent force. Be a fairly basic thing to deal with and at least there is something in place as there is in other countries.
 
My 2P is if they put cost up to £500 a ticket or flat £500 for both if renewed at same time. It wouldn’t bother me at all as let’s face it it’s only £100/year. And within that cost they (police) set a contract with for the like of the mid west with wms firearms todo a basic firearm safe handling course what they (wms) then notify the relivent force. Be a fairly basic thing to deal with and at least there is something in place as there is in other countries.
You my friend are far richer than I and that price hike would probably sadly see the end of my shooting.
Most money I’ve spent was £525 on a barely used (maybe used to sight in) Tikka T3. All my other gear has been less than that.
Having been unwell and in hospital for almost 2yrs wiped out £20k of savings we had.
So all big money spending in our house has to looked at carefully.
 
That is ridiculous…5mm outside the circle the assessor should be using his discretion.
If the candidate is using a borrowed estate rifle and shoots a really good group with this rifle but is a few millimeters outside the circle is a whole different ball game to a shotgun pattern with one or more outside the circle. Also I have been present when DSC1 shooting tests have been undertaken in horizontal rain and fierce gusty wind ... I am sure assessors do indeed use their discretion where they can ... but the danger is a candidate who might post on here or FB if they notice a candidate being passed who had technically 'missed'. In a stalking situation you could pass up a shot in those situations ... not so if you are sitting a test.
 
You my friend are far richer than I and that price hike would probably sadly see the end of my shooting.
Most money I’ve spent was £525 on a barely used (maybe used to sight in) Tikka T3. All my other gear has been less than that.
Having been unwell and in hospital for almost 2yrs wiped out £20k of savings we had.
So all big money spending in our house has to looked at carefully.
I’m by no means rich, in fact very far from it, but at £100/year it works out to £1.91/ week, or £8.33 /month. I can’t see how it’s living beyond any means.
It’s unfortunate for you that you’ve been in hospital for 2 years and Inturn cost you £20k.

Obviously I’m the same as everyone else where for that cost I would want the service to improve dramatically, there then shouldn’t be 12+ month waits for grants, 6month+ for change of address / renewals. For the latter should all be done within 7-10 days maximum, Including postage time.
 
My 2P is if they put cost up to £500 a ticket or flat £500 for both if renewed at same time. It wouldn’t bother me at all as let’s face it it’s only £100/year. And within that cost they (police) set a contract with for the like of the mid west with wms firearms todo a basic firearm safe handling course what they (wms) then notify the relivent force. Be a fairly basic thing to deal with and at least there is something in place as there is in other countries.
I’m sorry but you’re clearly smoking something not conducive with firearms ownership.
That you think that £500 would get you a a FAC & shotgun cert plus 2 safe handling tests and all the admin to go with it.
 
I’m sorry but you’re clearly smoking something not conducive with firearms ownership.
That you think that £500 would get you a a FAC & shotgun cert plus 2 safe handling tests and all the admin to go with it.
That’s why as I said the police strike a deal with such places, it doesn't need tobe one to one, it could be groups of 10-20 people, would take no longer than a hour on range to demonstrate safe practices, and discipline. And a basic online or in classroom multiple choice.
And would be one safe handling combined if coterminous certificates.

Currently dsc1 is a 3/4 day course? And the cost of that is £300/pp? So I’m not sure as to how you don’t think it could be done for under £500. I’ve previously done both shotgun and firearm safe handling courses it didn’t come anywhere near too £500! Was if I remember correctly £120.

And I can assure you I never have nor will ever touch narcotics.
 
The rifle club i go to do a safe handling course before you go onto a range.
I have completed this now at two clubs and with a mentor on two days of training.
So why pay more cost.
Would it be better if a mentor could sign it off due to more cost it you do not belong to any clubs.


Just my thought as some are on a budget in life and we all cant afford a bunch of purdy's
 

Building on the above I found the following very useful:

Where to shoot a deer - 11 shot placement diagrams (where to aim)

 
Back
Top