All that Richard Prior wrote ! There are a lot btw by this one author alone , some still in print others need searching out from specialist book sellers .
The data showing rare close inbreeding in the Rum project is quite new - mainly published in the last 4-5 years. It does happen, but much more rarely than predicted by which stags were holding harems.That's certainly the first that I have heard of it and I have read quite a few books on deer management so surprised that none of those books including those by Richard Prior mention that. They don't mention hinds choosing non related stags for mates in the Rum project either! Certainly not that I remember. It is a hard read though so I could be wrong?
At least a book will have passed through the hands of a discerning publisher who wouldn't knowingly endorse something that was incorrect, which is more than can be said for most of the "expert" opinions posted on the Internet.Just because people write books doesnt mean they are correct![]()
Think about it this way: close inbreeding is usually disastrous for the quality of the offspring. There is very strong natural selection to avoid it.That's certainly the first that I have heard of it and I have read quite a few books on deer management so surprised that none of those books including those by Richard Prior mention that. They don't mention hinds choosing non related stags for mates in the Rum project either! Certainly not that I remember. It is a hard read though so I could be wrong?
What would a publisher know , they're only interested in making money.At least a book will have passed through the hands of a discerning publisher who wouldn't knowingly endorse something that was incorrect, which is more than can be said for most of the "expert" opinions posted on the Internet.
Is there?There is very strong natural selection to avoid it.
I think you have a touching faith in both the honesty and competence of publishers!!At least a book will have passed through the hands of a discerning publisher who wouldn't knowingly endorse something that was incorrect, which is more than can be said for most of the "expert" opinions posted on the Internet.
Dogs will sh@g anythingThink about it this way: close inbreeding is usually disastrous for the quality of the offspring. There is very strong natural selection to avoid it.
How naiveAt least a book will have passed through the hands of a discerning publisher who wouldn't knowingly endorse something that was incorrect,
They will - but they’re not wild.Dogs will sh@g anything![]()
Just like the internet then ? Should we just ignore both these sources ? Prior remains the guy who studied and stalked and wrote about the Roe the most . As regards is the Ttsx better than the Sako blade the better bullet ? you would certainly need to ask someone with a lot of experience on both. I mean he also travelled to study the Russian version of the Roe etc .Just because people write books doesnt mean they are correct![]()
Generally, yes.Is there?
It sounds reasonable. Evidence would be great though.Generally, yes.
Especially on females. Less so on males.
Almost every mammal species that has been investigated in enough detail has a suite of inbreeding avoidance mechanisms. In many mammals, it’s based on smell and seems to use familiarity as the reference - essentially using a simple ‘don’t shag something that smells like yourself’ rule of thumb.
A starting point, which shouldn’t be behind a paywall:It sounds reasonable. Evidence would be great though.
Maybe a bit. But I am talking from personal experience.How naive![]()
Thanks for posting this. You have anticipated an answer to one of the questions I have be thinking about... I was wondering whether, if I were to shoot all the roe bucks on a particular ground early in the season, whether the does would be likely to leave the ground in search of a mate (further reducing the overall numbers) or pull replacement bucks on to the ground (maintaining approx numbers). I appreciate that not all wild animals have read the manual and that they don't always behave as they are "supposed" to do. But it's a good example of the sort of general principles of roe management and the impact of selective culling that I am trying to understand in more detail.Stalking Roe we know the bucks are territorial, but then having stalked Roe for over fifty years I have found that the does are more so. If she is in season and there are no bucks on her patch she will go and fetch one. I have seen this many times. Last year there was a doe on my patch being alongside a very poor buck (in size and antlers) which I shot in early July. Within two weeks she was running with a very nice six pointer. He appeared with her and her twins again in October and at present is still on her patch with the family. When he is clean I may shoot him as I know she will look for another come the time. I also have another equally good buck in another family group, however there are two buck fawns in that group and I will shoot one of them. The mature buck there is resident on her patch and I will leave him another year.
We don't have many Roe so I can afford to be a bit selective and pick my beasts. I have hung back from shooting does because we have nothing they can damage and the owners like them and are happy to see a few more. Fallow however are our main cull animals and does are what we are taking all the time. Richard's bucks on Roe are good, particularly the later ones as his knowledge improved over the years.![]()
Irrelevant and means absolutely nothing except that you stalked your first roe 50 years ago.having stalked Roe for over fifty years
How do you know that she went looking for a buck and it wasn't the buck that smelt her and came looking for her? Your explanation certainly isn't proof that she went looking for him.If she is in season and there are no bucks on her patch she will go and fetch one. I have seen this many times. Last year there was a doe on my patch being alongside a very poor buck (in size and antlers) which I shot in early July. Within two weeks she was running with a very nice six pointer.