billy_boyle_2010
Well-Known Member
Yes, I was disagreeing with your use of the word "accurate".
What I think you're really trying to say is that a 1" high zero at 100 may not be so practical for taking head shots at the sort of distances that most people might be tempted to try it.
Someone's ability to shoot accurately isn't a factor of where they've zeroed. You could zero 6" left at 115 yards and still be incredibly accurate, or you could zero bang on at 100 and be a very inaccurate shooter.
Personally, I think that using the MPBR concept is very sensible.
Agree totally on the first part of your post. "Accurate" was def the wrong word
As to MPBR- it looks v good on paper. Please correct me if I'm wrong- but from what I have read- many deer calibres have MPBR of nearly 300 yards for the larger deer species (with an 8" kill zone) is normal. They rely on a zero around 200-240 yards- with bullets hitting 3-4" high at points before this- spot on at 220ish- and dropping 3-4" by 280-300 yards.
The issue I have with them- is they are based on the theoretical placement of the bullet trajectory. And don't factor in human error.
A gun may be 1 MOA on paper at 100. Not many manage that in the field. With 2-3MOA being more reasonable in the real world- at the upper limits and lower elevations of trajectory- some of these shots are outside of the kill zone.
Essentially- the MPBR takes away some of your margin for error.