Have you checked the velocity?Im going out after muntjac later this week and typically they are likely to be at much shorter ranges then I normally shoot. My 6.5 Creed is zeroed at 150 yards so I checked it on paper at 50 yards and 100 yards. Shot about 1.5 inches high at 50 and about an inch at 100 so 1/4'' that you mention sounds about right.
Everyone makes mistakes, no question about it. The trick is minimising those errors where possible.
For most people this looks like proper practice with their equipment, as more often than not it’s us that lets ourselves down, not our kit.
In other circumstances it may be furthering our knowledge. It’s far better to learn from others mistakes than make them ourselves, so reading and listening goes a long way. CPD events such as those run by Forestry Commission / @Alastair Boston are an example of a good way to do this.
The rest of the skill is in being able to mop up the mess, which invariably falls into the above two camps too. Practice for the poor shot and getting a good follow up in, understand the procedure to follow when after a poor shot and/or following a wounded deer and mentally rehearse that, it will save some of the ‘jelly man/woman’ factor when something does go wrong.
Ben
I thought about this after I put my response...and see your point.. However if the bullet is already on the downward trajectory and drops 1/2 inch between 50 and 100 yards it then drops the remaining inch to be on zero at 150 yards so it makes sense.I would have thought the bullets would hit lower at 50 yards than at 100 yards!
If it’s 1.5 high at 50 and 1.0 at 100, the bullet is already in a downward trajectory, so how can it get back up to zero at 150?
Ken.
Havent checked velocity ...just where the bullet hit the targets at the ranges stated. Might have to do a bit more target practice to see as I thought it was slightly odd but I am not great when it comes to the theory behind ballistics hence why I prefer shooting the rifle and seeing where the bullet strikesHave you checked the velocity?
At 50 yards you should be roughly 1/2 inch low to be zero at 100.
A 50 yard zero will also be zero at 150 yards.
Mounts are Tier 1 Monomounts 0 MOA so dont think its thatI'm wondering if you have some inclined mounts and have them the wrong way around or something...![]()
I'm wondering if you have some inclined mounts and have them the wrong way around or something...![]()
Without knowing your scope height over bore and your starting velocity it’s not easy to be precise.Mounts are Tier 1 Monomounts 0 MOA so dont think its that
I ll put a few rounds through on paper again when I get a chance and also try and get the data for the ammo ...I am probaly having a senior moment![]()
Cheers for the commentsWithout knowing your scope height over bore and your starting velocity it’s not easy to be precise.
As Smellydog says, for a 150 zero you should be virtually (Tad high if anything) spot one at 50 yards and around 3/4” to 1” high at 100.
Cheers, Ken.
Ps. It was the 1 1/2” high at 50 started me thinking.
Aw man!Could you redraw the lines aiming for the top of the heart and at 30 degrees? Which is the shot in question (assumed aim point).
Then you would see that at that range and angle, you’d still hit the heart. The picture is exaggerated to make the point.
To put it into perspective, for your bullet to hit the deer at 45 degrees as the diagram, say from a high seat rail height of 3.6 metres, on flat ground the deer would have to be around 3-4 metres in front of you…..
Plugging the numbers into my ballistic calculator the 30 degree downhill angle makes no significant difference at 110m compared to a shot on flat ground at 110m.Out of interest, what would be the correct adjustment of aim for a 30° downhill slope at 110 yards?
I made no claim to it being soHonest post and I commend the OP for highlighting it but the downhill angle is unlikely to be the cause of the poor shot
Why mention it if you don’t consider it a contributory factor?I made no claim to it being so
[[When you say armpit, how low did you aim? Armpit to me sound like the spot where the skin goes from chest to leg, this sounds too low at only about a quarter up the body?Apologies to kick the thread up but there we go.... it happened, earlier in the day I shot a young buck and hut high though the deer died almost instantaneously regardless of what happened, In hindsight I had shot the deer from at maybe 60 meters so It made sense
We drove down and noticed the malformed buck that we seen earlier was still out feeding incredibly close to the road so we decided to take the shot, parked up and used the vehicle as a rest I do not know why but I decided to take the shot low I think in my head I wanted to go more for the traditional "Armpit" shot when In all reality why should I fix what wasn't broken? I have always shot deer high directly on the shoulder on my intended shots at least I think for a mostly novice person Its a safe reasonble shot on roe, regardless due to whatever happened I clearly hut too low or and stupid me went up there with a no knife and no rifle without realising the deer was injured.
As much as it sucked the deer was still lung shot but due to the ground It wasn't visible from the car (where the person was with the rifle) and It wasn't a quick "Oh ****" and run back to the vehicle the time they had made there way up here the deer had expired, moors are unforgiving sometimes on that aspect.
Shot at 17:33, got to the shot site at 17:37(ish) and deer and the last photo timestamped was after the gralloch at 17:46 , so the deer was alive for probably about 10 minutes after the shot..... not my best shooting It certainly wasnt a pleasant sight to watch an animal struggle up close.
View attachment 408112[[

Go back to a proper scopeI shot 2 reds through the stomachs at 100 yards yesterday morning. 1st off sticks, second 10 mins later off bipod. New(ish) Alpex scope and POA looked good on playback but both bullets went through stomachs and diaphragms (only discovered on gralloch). All I can think is that zero has shifted but it's too wet and windy out there to check today. Very p'd off!
It's not the scope. There's another thread on bullet deflections which I think you posted in.Go back to a proper scope