I anneal after every case usage. In that way I hope to extend the life of my brass as best I can.
The two calibers for which I have a relatively low number of cases are now racking up reload cycles more quickly that those calibers for which I have a larger pool of once-fired brass.
My current .375 and 30.06 batches are at 4x and 3x fired respectively.
Today I prepped some 3x fired 30.06 brass and found 6 case fails in a batch of 33. Not ideal. But better to discover pre-usage. This emphasises the need to be vigilent during case prep. The first example was first flagged via beams of light through pinprick holes:
The others were more obvious:
Three cases were Federal, and three cases were Sako. So not a brand issue neccessarily. Uniquely, I full resize my 30.06 cases [whereas I shoulder bump .223, 6.5x55 and .375] because that gave best accuracy when I developed the load for this chambering. I wonder if I am over-working the brass in the shoulder/neck and should contemplate trying a shoulder bump instead...
The two calibers for which I have a relatively low number of cases are now racking up reload cycles more quickly that those calibers for which I have a larger pool of once-fired brass.
My current .375 and 30.06 batches are at 4x and 3x fired respectively.
Today I prepped some 3x fired 30.06 brass and found 6 case fails in a batch of 33. Not ideal. But better to discover pre-usage. This emphasises the need to be vigilent during case prep. The first example was first flagged via beams of light through pinprick holes:

The others were more obvious:

Three cases were Federal, and three cases were Sako. So not a brand issue neccessarily. Uniquely, I full resize my 30.06 cases [whereas I shoulder bump .223, 6.5x55 and .375] because that gave best accuracy when I developed the load for this chambering. I wonder if I am over-working the brass in the shoulder/neck and should contemplate trying a shoulder bump instead...

