HonestJohn
Well-Known Member
They don’t know what they’re talking about, simple as that.
Have you never seen the ones in the auctions with the police evidence stickers on? Or that one of the police forces sell stuff via eBay regularly?Hahah ! If you think a surrendered firearm would/could be sold back into the market then you’re very unaware when it comes to Police paperwork.
The only way that a dishonest officer could do so (yes, there’s some about but he thankfully not many) would’ve been to hand the owner no receipt or paperwork to show it’d been handed in. And what about the owners FAC which must show it as surrendered ? Otherwise he’d have to account for it…
Then the officer could sell it on - oh, hold the phone, he’d have to have a current FAC with that weapon on it wouldn’t he ?
Stop the conspiracy theories..
That’s a nice touch, the bit about the ping-pong balls. I like that.A detective stealing 400k of cocaine reminded me of when a chap working on the same site as me was raided for growing cannabis. He was well known in the local town for growing a few plants for "home consumption" he knew the rules as well, so to speak, grow in soil, and never more than three plants, and you should get away with it if you have your collar felt...
He grew one plant in his polytunnel one summer.. in his words, "it grew like a trifid".. plod rolled up, sat outside his house for 15 minutes looking at the polytunnel, eventually knocked on his door and did the necessary.. they told him if he had hung a few red ping pong balls on the plant they would have just driven away thinking it was tomatoe plants... he swears to this day that the police were stipping the buds off the plant as they stuffed it into bags... true or not, it's a funny story...
I wonder whether they will really be contentious?With questions such as what constitutes a controlled or prohibited part it’s always looking at the primary legislation and / or the home office guidance (to which there is a sticky at the head of this section).
If you have a look at the latter is describes
“Definition of ‘relevant component part’
2.5 A ‘relevant component part’ of a lethal barrelled or prohibited weapon is a firearm in its own right and is defined in section 57(1D) of the 1968 Act as:
but only where the item is capable of being used as a part of a lethal barrelled weapon or a prohibited weapon.”
- a) a barrel, chamber or cylinder,
- b) a frame, body or receiver,
- c) a breech block, bolt or other mechanism for containing the pressure of discharge at the rear of a chamber,
Magazines will be a contentious issue. They hold the cartridges and allow the gun to function as a repeating firearm. Most bolt action guns work just fine without a magazine, but are quite fiddly to load just one cartridge. A magazine dramatically improves the functionality of a firearm. But is it a relevant component part. Probably not by the above legal definition. Some firearms, notably many pistol designs will not function with a magazine in place. In such a case is it a “relevant component part” - probably comes down to argument and judgement.
Unfortunately you are correct. There was a case close to me many years ago where a really good police sergeant persuaded a local guy to surrender his rifle "voluntarily" only for the guy to come back some time later, and following legal advise, to retrieve his rifle.It has happened in the past.
David.
Some of us remember the sharp rise in handgun crime after the handgun ban and some of us know not all of them handed in were destroyed!!
Or have it himself!one of the plods wants to sell it on !
Very believable.Strange he’s requested magazine….I’d think he wants the mag or some of his mates needs one ,
Yes. At auction. With the police sticker. Correct. Not often but it does happen.Have you never seen the ones in the auctions with the police evidence stickers on? Or that one of the police forces sell stuff via eBay regularly?
The policeman wants it because they want to move on the rifle.
As has been said, it’s not a pressure bearing part, no restrictions at all
It was a tongue in cheek joke. Virtually impossible and fairly improbable they’d try. JeezHow exactly, would they do that? Why would they risk their pension for a gun that is literally worth nothing? Ridiculous. Shakey…is this a second account?
Sounds like they are unsure of the legalities on magazines. That it, no more, no less. Cops are not fully conversant with every detail of every bit of legislation, so have erred on the side of caution.
No not me, i would assume dodgy copper just rape and murder not go rabbit shootingHow exactly, would they do that? Why would they risk their pension for a gun that is literally worth nothing? Ridiculous. Shakey…is this a second account?
Sounds like they are unsure of the legalities on magazines. That it, no more, no less. Cops are not fully conversant with every detail of every bit of legislation, so have erred on the side of caution.
No not me, i would assume dodgy copper just rape and murder not go rabbit shooting