Never said he was innocent, perhaps we should bring back the dousing chair, if he drowns he is innocent, if he lives obviously guilty, sounds like the modern media to me.Seems like a few believe Andrew is innocent.
Never said he was innocent, perhaps we should bring back the dousing chair, if he drowns he is innocent, if he lives obviously guilty, sounds like the modern media to me.Seems like a few believe Andrew is innocent.
Yep, the old duke was a foul-mouthed entitled Wan ker. Sticking fu cks and threats into folks just for trying to finish a job on time, so the company didn't fall foul of late penalty payments.Was he really? I suppose they all walked of the job and refused to take a penny.
I am not a fan of the royals, personally don’t give them a second thought, they probably do more good than harm, for all there money I would not like there job, and yes it is a job, what I don’t, like is the politics of envy.
Not my style. The company concerned is still going strong. I guess they know a stupid, entitled fool when they see one. The game is a long oneWell there is a good story you could sell to the press.

How many trials in the US are fair? If someone takes a dislike to you, the government goes venue shopping to put you before the hardest judge, fills the jury with ex-FBI, CIA and prison workers, and has a 98.5% conviction rate due to it being better to take a plea deals than risk absurdly long penalties.Or he could voluntarily go to the USA and face his accusers, if he has done no wrong he has nothing to fear and after any trial he would be free to earn a fortune on chat shoes and the like.
I thought this has all been dragging on because VG was 17 years old and underage to have consensual sex in one of the three places Andy allegedly pummelled into herWhat is not fair is trial by media, when in Mr Windor's case, there is not even a crime that is claimed to have been committed. A bit like being stopped by the police in the USA, you are clean, so they search for anything to justify the stop: we have a a guilty person, so we have to find a crime that he did. So far, no actual crime has been identified.
You'd have been fine back then as families closed ranks as distinct from casting their offspring to the wolves and onto an estate dungheap.Anyone else looking back on their promiscuous youth and thinking "there but for the grace of God...."?
Damn, it's lucky I wasn't born a prince, or I could really be in trouble now!
Where? The only one I am aware of, for which that is anything in the public domain that is close to being evidence is a meeting in London, and even that is a photo with no negative, where the other person alive in that photo says it is fake, and even if it is not fake, it involves nothing illegal.I thought this has all been dragging on because VG was 17 years old and underage to have consensual sex in one of the three places Andy allegedly pummelled into her...
Did he sleep?I thought the underage sex part of the story was linked to America, I could be wrong.
Still, it's a bit unsavoury to be allegedly sleeping with girls as young as one's daughters.
Funny old world when a young girl can blackmail a very wealthy, influential family for several million pounds... You would have thought they would have said, "Let's meet in court" that's usually what happens with these cases.
I expect time will reveal a few more facts.
What do you thinkDid he sleep?
What do you think.
Andrew is a prize scalp for the media to take. They love it when they can topple the high & mighty from the proverbial Ivory Tower. They must have much $hite on him that they could never print. The fact that he has hung himself by not moderating his exposure to the public must bring Fleet Street much joy.
Epstein was a control freak by all accounts.What evidence is there that he has done anything illegal, or even wrong for that matter?
I also struggle with the whole Epstein thing, that man could afford to procure / keep a harem of young females to pander to his sexual whims, all of whom at the time were in all likelihood very willing participants and no doubt very well rewarded. So what, lucky him…..doesn’t seem exactly to be crime of the century.