Reloader708
Well-Known Member
Have you tried it on driven grouse yet?One which holds 12 carts is plenty for me!![]()
![]()
Have you tried it on driven grouse yet?One which holds 12 carts is plenty for me!![]()
![]()
Ok I’ll rephrase- not being addressed by this proposal. The point being that any firearms offence always seems to be addressed by tighter controls on FAC/SGC holders when in actual fact most offences seem to be entirely unrelated.But you were talking about crimes committed with air guns for which you said "no ticket required".
The EA contend that their work helps to provide an environment in which the fish will thrive, the thought of Hampshire FLD planting game crops across the countryside is nevertheless amusing.Fishing rod licenses are the alternative to business rates on fisheries. This way, the money goes to the EA instead of the local government wasters. If fisheries were charged business rates, they would put up there tickets, possibly making smaller setups VATable, so best left as it is.
No.Surely you mean "Good reason"

Don't jest. There's already been an MP proposing that all pointed / sharp domestic kitchen knives should be banned. Apparently sharp knives are only required by professional chefs, butchers etc.Maybe they should be increasing the prices of kitchen knife in the capital instead...

As long as we are able to self identify as butchers...Don't jest. There's already been an MP proposing that all pointed / sharp domestic kitchen knives should be banned. Apparently sharp knives are only required by professional chefs, butchers etc.![]()
I'm sure that the authorities would love the word need in the firearms act instead of good reason, e.g. you don't need a stalking rifle because you could use an estate rifle or you don't need a rifle for target shooting because you could use a club rifle etc.No.
I was responding directly to @Norfolk Deer Search, who used the word need.
Which is why I used that word (in quotation marks) in my response.
View attachment 286256
Lets look at drug and drink driving harder if we want to save lives . Then focus on the plague of street dealing , we are talking thousands of lives a year with that and lots of other crimes as users feed their habbit and dealers fight over territories .we live in a country with probably the strictest firearm laws in the world, thank god we have statistically a very tiny incident of criminal miss use of firearms by firearms certificate holders. Trying to reduce the very tiny number of incidents to zero is like any scientist will tell you like trying to get to absolute zero in temperature, impossible, the closer you get the harder it gets to go lower.
Other than a total ban of all ownership of firearms the risk however small will always remain regardless of the process used to issue firearms certificates, what we need is a government that recognises that, but the chance of that is like winning the lotto.