enfieldspares
Well-Known Member
Wow! Like new! A true "sleeper".I am trying to attach a photo of my Covid gun, bought sight unseen during lockdown two years ago. It is a Webley 100
Wow! Like new! A true "sleeper".I am trying to attach a photo of my Covid gun, bought sight unseen during lockdown two years ago. It is a Webley 100
I have 2 in 12G the best one in like new condition I had a hushpower fitted to it as it had only cost me £75, incoming!!!!!!!Wow! Like new! A true "sleeper".
I confess to never having seen a Webley with a single trigger. You would probably be doing yourself a great favour if you got the chokes opened out.I have a Webley & Scott 701, single trigger, in 16 bore with 30" barrels and 2 3/4 chambers. Full and half choke. It was made in 1972 and I had Brady's make a case for it. I love its sweet lines, but other than the odd pheasant I can't hit a thing with it.
That's very possibly not your fault that's the fault of the gun.I have a Webley & Scott 701, single trigger, in 16 bore with 30" barrels and 2 3/4 chambers. Full and half choke. It was made in 1972 and I had Brady's make a case for it. I love its sweet lines, but other than the odd pheasant I can't hit a thing with it.
Harrington and Richardson imported Webley & Scott SxS’s back in the 70’s models 720 and 728 they were cased straight grip double trigger guns . I wanted a 728 some kinda bad and fondled several at a semi local shop . But at the time I was in the 8th or 9th grade and they were if my memory serves about $1200 and I certainly didn’t have that then . That little 728 28 gauge felt like a magic wand .I have a Webley & Scott 701, single trigger, in 16 bore with 30" barrels and 2 3/4 chambers. Full and half choke. It was made in 1972 and I had Brady's make a case for it. I love its sweet lines, but other than the odd pheasant I can't hit a thing with it.
DankeEndes gut alles gut as they say in Germany.
No.Could be a range of school marks out of 20. 8/20 isnt great, sort of an E. 15/20 is maybe a B. But never an A.
Wiki, Es gibt mehrere Erklärungsansätze zur Entstehung der Redewendung, die im Zusammenhang mit dem Maschinengewehr 08/15 stehen. 08/15 steht für das Einführungsjahr des Ursprungsmodells MG 08, 1908, und für 1915, das Jahr der Weiterentwicklung. Diese Zahlen wurden in die Waffen eingeschlagen.Now here's a weird German phrase...Nullachtfunfzehn!
Which means it'll do but it's not very good at best.
But literally is zero, eight, fifteen.
Any clues why?
Wiki, Es gibt mehrere Erklärungsansätze zur Entstehung der Redewendung, die im Zusammenhang mit dem Maschinengewehr 08/15 stehen. 08/15 steht für das Einführungsjahr des Ursprungsmodells MG 08, 1908, und für 1915, das Jahr der Weiterentwicklung. Diese Zahlen wurden in die Waffen eingeschlagen.
I know it in todays usage here as "its ok, it will do the job but it is not special".
- Der erste Ansatz[1] führt die Redewendung darauf zurück, dass im Ersten Weltkrieg die deutschen Soldaten täglich mit diesem Maschinengewehr ein langwieriges und eintöniges Training zu absolvieren hatten. So habe die Bezeichnung 08/15 bei den Soldaten irgendwann für langweilige Routine gestanden, derer sie schon lange überdrüssig geworden waren.
- Eine andere Erklärung geht auf die Länge des Ersten Weltkrieges zurück und hängt mit der Qualität der Waffen zusammen. Ab dem Zeitpunkt der Einführung des MG 08/15 nahm die Materialqualität ab und die Fehlerhäufigkeit zu. Mit Äußerungen wie „Die Waffe ist 08/15!“ hätten die Soldaten demnach die Bedeutung „von geringer Qualität“ geprägt.
- Durch fortschreitende Standardisierung war es möglich, Einzelteile des einschlägig bekannten Maschinengewehrs auch in Fahrrad- oder Schreibmaschinenfabriken herzustellen. Auch die Munition war zu diesem Zeitpunkt schon zwischen verschiedenen Modellen problemlos austauschbar. Der Ausspruch „das ist 08/15“ lässt sich also auch auf einen (durchschnittlichen) Standard beziehen.[2] Translation There are several explanations for the origin of the phrase, which are related to the 08/15 machine gun. 08/15 stands for the year of introduction of the original model MG 08, 1908, and for 1915, the year of further development. These numbers were stamped into the weapons.
The first approach attributes the idiom to the fact that during the First World War, German soldiers had to complete lengthy and monotonous training with this machine gun every day. At some point, the soldiers used the term 08/15 to mean a boring routine that they had long since grown tired of.
Another explanation goes back to the length of the First World War and is related to the quality of the weapons. From the time the MG 08/15 was introduced, the material quality decreased and the frequency of errors increased. With statements like “The weapon is run of the mill!” the soldiers would have coined the meaning “of low quality”.
As standardization progressed, it was possible to produce individual parts of the well-known machine gun in bicycle or typewriter factories. At this point, the ammunition could also be easily interchanged between different models. The saying “that’s run of the mill” can also be referred to an (average) standard.

No. I don't think that's actually really why. German weapons quality remained good. So I the internet explanation quoted is wrong.There are several explanations for the origin of the phrase, which are related to the 08/15 machine gun. 08/15 stands for the year of introduction of the original model MG 08, 1908, and for 1915, the year of further development. These numbers were stamped into the weapons.
The first approach attributes the idiom to the fact that during the First World War, German soldiers had to complete lengthy and monotonous training with this machine gun every day. At some point, the soldiers used the term 08/15 to mean a boring routine that they had long since grown tired of.
Another explanation goes back to the length of the First World War and is related to the quality of the weapons. From the time the MG 08/15 was introduced, the material quality decreased and the frequency of errors increased. With statements like “The weapon is run of the mill!” the soldiers would have coined the meaning “of low quality”.
As standardization progressed, it was possible to produce individual parts of the well-known machine gun in bicycle or typewriter factories. At this point, the ammunition could also be easily interchanged between different models. The saying “that’s run of the mill” can also be referred to an (average) standard.