Why do you ask ?
Because I'm not military or acquainted with the uniforms/regalia etc. I was definitely not judging or passing any criticism.Why do you ask ?
These are the Armed Forces Bikers. Quite a decent charity.
How very well put ,wShowing one's respects for the dead is a very personal thing, and it is wrong to comment on how another person mourns.
What someone chooses to wear, where they choose to go to reflect, whether they do / don't wear a black tie, whether they observe the "official" periods of silence etc etc, are all at the discretion of the individual. Different people have their own way of showing respect and expressing grief, and not everyone feels comfortable with the "conventional" way. The person who has passed will mean different things to different people, and their own method of mourning will reflect that, and that alone.
Personally, I do not commerate the one terrible day that someone died. I'd rather remember all the wonderful days they lived. So no black tie for me.
I have no doubt he earned the medals on his left chest. Equally, I have no doubt he bought the ones on his right chest, as they are commemorative medals, rather than issued ones.Well until I'm proven otherwise, I call Walt.
Brilliant, thank you for the info. Hat off to the gent.I have no doubt he earned the medals on his left chest. Equally, I have no doubt he bought the ones on his right chest, as they are commemorative medals, rather than issued ones.
The operational medals are in chronological order (as they should be) and are (L-R):
1. Gulf War medal issued by the Brits - August 1990 to March 1991. Different clasps available depending when you were there.
2. UNPROFOR medal issued by the UN for service in Former Yugoslavia - March 1992 to December 1995.
3. NATO Former Yugoslavia medal issued by the Brits - July 92 to December 2002 - it always has the Former Yugoslavia clasp. The numeral 2 denotes the number of op tours in FRY carried out by the individual. Not really approved for wear by UK dress regs, but I know a lot of people have put them on.
4. NATO Kosovo medal issued by the Brits - October 1998 to December 2002 - it always has the Kosovo clasp.
5. Iraq Medal - January 2003 to May 2011
The one on the end is the Golden Jubilee medal (2002). All of the jubilee and long service medals are mounted after the operational medals. As he is not wearing the Diamond Jubilee issued in February 2012, that means that he left the Forces before then.
So, judging by the medals, I would say he was probably at least 20 when he got the Gulf War Medal, so that makes him around 52+. And he must have spent at least 14 and possibly up to 20 years in the Army.
The only thing I would comment on is that when you have 6 medals, they should be overlapped so that they are the width of 5 medal ribbons (according to dress regs, it is the width of the jacket chest pocket seams). Although I suppose once you are no longer serving, no-one is going to enforce the dress regs..............
Definitely not a Walt, though.
Until I’m proven otherwise I’ll surmise you’re talking rubbish.Well until I'm proven otherwise, I call Walt.
Does it matter what the guy chose to wear / display, or whether the medals were genuine? Really none of our business. He was there, paying his respects, and that's enough.Dear Rake.
Because you can buy badges - Google the 'brothers forever' one and it takes you to Amazon. That badge shows no allegiance to anything. And why wear that with two rows of medals? I know one bloke who is able to do that - one!
Assumptions are not proof, especially of identity. Assumptions are where mistakes are made, analysis provides facts. Your FLO doesn't make assumptions.
I'm looking for facts, which counters what you want to believe, which is why you turn to personal insults. Really not necessary.
And, oh. By the way. I am ex-Army and do this sh*t for a living.
Pretty sure alleging someone is a ‘walt’ would be see as a personal insult.personal insults. Really not necessary.