BASC expels members for wildlife crime and firearms offences

Conor O'Gorman

Well-Known Member
BASC has expelled for life two members convicted of wildlife and firearms offences. The expulsions follow a long-established disciplinary procedure.

Expulsion from BASC involves the loss of shooting insurance, on which the ability to shoot may depend, and other benefits of membership. Those involved are:

A member from Cheshire, who pleaded guilty to unlawfully using a trap, in which a sparrowhawk starved to death, on or before 10/2/21 contrary to Sec 5(1)(b) of the Wildlife and Countryside Act. He was fined £800, plus £85 costs and £80 victim surcharge.

A member from Suffolk, who pleaded guilty to six charges in relation to pesticide and firearms offences. The offences came to light after the discovery of a dead buzzard which had been poisoned after eating a pigeon carcass laced with the insecticide Bendiocarb.

The offences he pleaded guilty to were revealed following a search of his home. The member was given a community order of 80 hours unpaid work and ordered to pay £105 in costs with a £95 victim surcharge.

 
That is a matter for the courts and perhaps puts it into the context of other crimes. As a group, shooters obviously take a very dim view of criminality of all sorts and especially wildlife crime, which we find particularly odious. Perhaps it just reflects that outside our bubble and the minimal number of fervent antis, it really doesn't matter much to most people and there are much bigger issues to worry about.

BASC are undoubtedly correct to expel these members. That said, the RAC didn't expel me when I committed a driving offence.
 
Well just commenting on this issue alone, it's only right that BASC gives them the boot. Do other shooting organisations do the same? I don't know.

Yep, I guess those two people will get (or have got) their certificates cancelled.
 
Completely irrelevant.Both members will not find it difficult to get insurance cover by joining any one of a number of other organisations.
 
Surely due to the charges the police would remove their licences anyway.?
So they wouldn't need BASC membership.
What about insurance for beating ?
Syndicate work with chainsaws etc etc
The insurance covers far more than just shooting

Could a data base of bad apples be established where such a ban results in non of our representatives allowing membership ?
 
Completely irrelevant.Both members will not find it difficult to get insurance cover by joining any one of a number of other organisations.
Not so, Basc Council has for as long as I can remember sat on issues such as this and has decided on the severity of the punishment. I would come as no surprise if they did not receive a life time ban, other organisations would also be informed of their decision.
Here lies another problem, and it is a grey area that has not yet been tested, when you apply for insurance you have to declare if you have been refused or had insurance declined or terminated failure to do so could render any liability cover void.
 
Pity the same wasn't done with lead shot. But with all that BASC money that went to the British Game Alliance to justify excessive bags on the basis that what is shot enters the food chain perhaps a different ethic applies?
Regardless of support or lack their off to the transition away from lead shot, what has been done here is the right thing to do
 
That is a matter for the courts and perhaps puts it into the context of other crimes. As a group, shooters obviously take a very dim view of criminality of all sorts and especially wildlife crime, which we find particularly odious. Perhaps it just reflects that outside our bubble and the minimal number of fervent antis, it really doesn't matter much to most people and there are much bigger issues to worry about.

BASC are undoubtedly correct to expel these members. That said, the RAC didn't expel me when I committed a driving offence.
Ah yes but did you drift marginally over a speed limit or did you run over a granny at a pedestrian crossing who was holding you up for a couple of seconds too many?

This contribution was made by an objective bystander with no affiliation to BASC or indeed to tardy grandmothers.
 
Looking at all the negative comments on here, BASC can't seem to do anything right. I'm amazed that they continue to post
They do so because, I suspect, the silent majority here are interested in - and appreciative of - the work they do.

The noisy and familiar minority, on the other hand, can't see a BASC thread without posting their all-too familiar grievances.

I now treat these kind of threads as a game of "BASC Bingo".....I'm just waiting for the mention of "Catton Hall" and I'll have a full row ;)
 
It may be worth noting that the guy in Suffolk was not found guilty of poisoning the buzzard but incorrect storage of chemicals and having 2 shotguns in an unlocked room and 22 ammo not in a locked cabinet. Illegal but not exactly a hanging offence
 
They do so because, I suspect, the silent majority here are interested in - and appreciative of - the work they do.

The noisy and familiar minority, on the other hand, can't see a BASC thread without posting their all-too familiar grievances.

I now treat these kind of threads as a game of "BASC Bingo".....I'm just waiting for the mention of "Catton Hall" and I'll have a full row ;)
Where's Catton Hall?...
 
That is a matter for the courts and perhaps puts it into the context of other crimes. As a group, shooters obviously take a very dim view of criminality of all sorts and especially wildlife crime, which we find particularly odious. Perhaps it just reflects that outside our bubble and the minimal number of fervent antis, it really doesn't matter much to most people and there are much bigger issues to worry about.

BASC are undoubtedly correct to expel these members. That said, the RAC didn't expel me when I committed a driving offence.
How serious was the offence, penalty points, magistrates or crown court?
 
It may be worth noting that the guy in Suffolk was not found guilty of poisoning the buzzard but incorrect storage of chemicals and having 2 shotguns in an unlocked room and 22 ammo not in a locked cabinet. Illegal but not exactly a hanging offence

I don't know the details of the case that TH$ has highlighted, but if the person has been found not guility of a wildlife crime then it is a bit harsh them excluding him.
His other offences could happen to almost anyone if u got an unexpected visit at the wrong time

I would imagine if the polis came looking in ur shed/garage it would not be hard to find some weed killer not stored correctly??
And as for lose guns ammo, if the time was right again it could happen to almost anyone.

And to be fair not actually illegal to have guns in an unlockd room althou it would depend on how long they have ben there.
How many times have u jumped into a keepers/stalkers motor and been some ammo lying somewhere in it?
 
Back
Top