BDS Deerbytes: Clarity on DMC3

spiker76

Well-Known Member
Following enquiries, the BDS would like to clarify recent reports about a course called the DMC3.

A report suggested that this new commercial qualification “brings together learning pathways” from organisations including BASC and the British Deer Society. To avoid confusion, the BDS confirms that neither we nor our partners were consulted on the course content, and we have no involvement in its development or promotion. We also do not endorse claims that it “brings together qualifications and experience from all respected training providers,” though this may imply that materials from other providers have been drawn upon.

The BDS continues to deliver the Deer Manager’s Course, a three-day programme that has long been considered the benchmark for advanced deer management training. It remains practical, informative, and fairly priced at £450, reflecting the costs of delivering high-quality, face-to-face advanced training. We'd also like to add that for those who choose training with the BDS, any proceeds after costs go directly into supporting our wider charitable work, helping us continue to promote sustainable and responsible deer management across the UK.

In addition, the BDS has collaborated with Deer Management Qualifications (of which BASC is also a member) to develop the Deer Management Certificate, intended for those managing deer populations. Neither of these should be confused with the newly promoted DMC3 course.


Copied from Deerbytes

:popcorn::popcorn::popcorn::popcorn::popcorn::popcorn:
 
I saw the previous thread but for me, it is new news that the BDS is distancing itself from the DMC3 - I would guess that neither BDS nor BASC were consulted about the Shooting and Hunting Academy's DMC3 whereas the wording “brings together qualifications and experience from all respected training providers,” suggests otherwise.
 
Having done 2 BDS courses I'd strongly contest their self categorisation as "respected training provider" and they would be wise to see what others are doing as their entire offering is awful and I actively steer people away
 
Having done 2 BDS courses I'd strongly contest their self categorisation as "respected training provider" and they would be wise to see what others are doing as their entire offering is awful and I actively steer people away
Weblyish I wouldn't go quite as far as to say awful, I would just say that the standard varies.
 
Which ones?
Intro to stalking - which I thought would be useful as part of FAC good reason but was a waste of time and poorly organised

Online DSC1 with in person assessment. It was the only course running I could find in time for something I needed DSC for otherwise I would have gone elsewhere
 
Intro to stalking - which I thought would be useful as part of FAC good reason but was a waste of time and poorly organised

Online DSC1 with in person assessment. It was the only course running I could find in time for something I needed DSC for otherwise I would have gone elsewhere
Sorry, so to clarify you've actually done one introductory course and an assessment day (minus the actual in person course) so I'm struggling to see how that could warrant such a negative post considering you've actually had minimal engagement?

The introduction to stalking course is exactly that, an introduction for newcomers and not designed to provide good reason for an FAC grant and it sounds like you're sour because it didn't achieve what you thought it would. You're not expected to come out the other side ready for your level 2. 🙄

The BDS put on great courses. I'm positive that the vast majority of the people on this forum who have had full exposure would completely disagree with your comments.

Not to worry though, I'm sure the other organisations will gladly take your money 👍
 
Found their (BDS) Deer Managers Course useful and a good place to chat through ideas and approaches.

Like all class based learning it has limitations - but definitely some useful concepts around cull planning discussed and aging deer.

Overall, thought it was worthwhile and built on DSC1/2.
 
Back
Top