Caliber Choice

And i still can, my experiances with the .243" are real and current. As for your 7mm 115gn wiz bang, i have no experiance so i will not comment other than to say my 140gn sierra gamekings never give reason to complain on any counts using my 7-08. indeed some thoughts comming from usa are go heavier and slower with this gun!!
I agree that bullet construction is very important even more so at higher speeds hence i have tried to make the .243" more friendly - if i went for an even lighter bullet it should go even faster and slowing it down won't help due to ft lbs legal requirements and lighter than 100 grn makes it illegal for red in scotland etc.
Slower speeds and a big thump and longer barrel life wins for me hands down
 
Fair enough Kent :-D

Dont the yanks like to go heavier and consequently slower on everything :lol:

You may find this link of interest

http://www.lima-wiederladetechnik.de/7-mm/7-mm-08.htm

I know there a problems with even trying to get a 6.5 copper bullet up to the 100gn Scotland limit. I personally dont like the 243 as a calibre due to its top end limitation on bullet selection, so 7mm wins hands down every time. I have 2 x 308 but over the years keep coming back to the 7mm for versatility.

Regards

Mark
 
Kent said:
Slow heavy bullets knock deer off thier feet better, kill cleaner, penetrate deeper and damage less meat.

The .243" bullets are fast and comparatively light. I disagree with Thar a 100 grn .243" bullet will not reliable go staight through a Red / Sika stag.
Indeed i have shot a number of Fallow does / Roe were bone heavy meat contact has prevented getting a stike through.

Hi Kent

The slow heavy bullet is of cause the Africa PH mantra, how relevant it is to the UK and with new types of better constructed bullets I am not so sure.

What do you mean when you say a slow heavy bullet? To me this means something like a 300gn doing 2200fps, a calibre like a 45-70. Yes I quite agree that will but a deer down better than a 100gn 243 but apart from the legal aspect it would not be ideal for a longer shot.

All the calibres we have discussed are what might be termed “high velocity rifle calibres” with muzzle velocity of around 3000fps (apart from the swede). With bullets of 100 to 150gn being the norm’. None of these are using slow heavy bullets in my book.

Does a 300gn bullet with muzzle velocity of 2200fps kill better than a 300gn bullet doing 2900fps?

As regards to my comments on penetration maybe I should of said it is “capable” of punching a hole straight though a Sika or Red stag with a conventional heart lung shot, which is what most of us take. Admittedly if you start trying to break both shoulders or use lightly constructed bullets then you will not get “reliable” penetration but in taking these shots what about the meat damage? We are not shooting plains game here. What bullets are you using that are not capable of breaking both shoulders of a Roe deer, how big are your roe? :shock:

I have seen on more than one occasion red stags come into the larder hit fair and square with a 150gn .308 in the ribs and there has been no exit wound. There is a train of thought that this is a perfect matching of bullet to animal, as if the bullet exits then it still has energy in it and this energy would be better if it was put into the animal. Personally I like an exit wound as it makes following up easier if the animal does not drop on the spot.

All the above said I do not advocate the use of a 243 on Stags if you have something bigger.

In conclusion my points of my first post were.

1. The 6.5X55 is a good medium calibre but don’t get the idea it is a magical cartridge.
2. The largest calibre I can shoot and see the deer’s reaction to the shot is a 243 which is more important to me in the field than a small ballistic advantage of another calibre.
3. If you are regularly shooting stags consider something with a bit more clout than a 6.5X55.
4. Don’t get too hung up on calibre if it is deer legal get out there and shoot some.

Best rgds

Thar
 
If you want here is one slow heavy bullet

DSCN2019.jpg


:twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

The other is a 243 ballistic tip

Mark
 
I don't care how big its its how you use it. :lol: :lol: :lol: :twisted: (said the actress to the bishop) ;)

It would take some cartridge to keep that deer legal above the border:- 375 calibre?

Best rgds

Thar
 
I have expanding bullets in 458 for sick or injured animals on my FAC so the poor roe better not limp :lol:

Mark
 
markH
i am confused you say you hav expanding bullets in 458 for sick and injured animals on your fac how?
my force won't let me hav expanding for a 375 for pigs or red stags or even for humane purposes because
(1) i hav a 3006
(2) they argue it is not a legal calibre in this country for deer so i do not need expanding ammo
Even though i hav given them official paperwork to say it is legal for large red stags in the uk what hav i done wrong any help would be appreciated
yours stone
 
Hi Stone

375 is a legal caliber for deer in the UK but you do need land to shoot it on. I can even shoot fox with the 375 while stalking. Speak to BASC.

My local FLO knows I do follow up on wounded and injured game with tracking dogs. We discussed the advatages of a large caliber iron sight, short barreled rifle over shotgun/slug and normal hunting rifle with scope etc etc and after a sensible discussion he allowed expanding ammunition

I had a little bit of a fight to get deer and fox on my 7mm and 308 as seperate items but yet again I have my own land to shoot on. This always helps.

Mark
 
thanks for that mark
that gives me food for thought i shall persevere but now with more angles to try
i do hav my own ground which i zero all my rifles on except the 375 as the ground is not suitable even though the ground is passed for stalking fox and muntjac with upto a 300win mag
kind regards stone
 
The great sectional density is wasted on UK game (a 243 100gn will go straight though a Sika or Red stag) you don’t need any more penetration on UK game assuming you are using proper game bullets (not thin jacketed varmint bullets).

Thar, this is my point in my experiaces this is incorrect- i listed the bullets i have tried in the .243" i shot a roe about 3-4 wks ago 95gn Nosler b/tip no exit wound- i am talking boiler room i very rarely go to break the shoulders ! This is not an isolated incident.

The .243" is an ok roe / fox round - it is deffinatly not my choice for the bigger deer though i have used it as such. even when i get a strike through i have had clean heart shot beasts just stand still - this has never happened with 140 grn SGK ! i also witnessed a heart shot fallow get back on it's feet after going down and go another 50yds, it was shot by another stalker late one eve and was followed up a bit too quickly as it was going dark- luckily it disided it was dead 50 yds further on before it reached cover! I have never seen or heard of this happening before or scince

I hear your point about recoil and spotting the stike but this also relates to the rifle itself my .308" is my lightest recoiling centrefire but it has a heavy 26" barrel and a blooming great big heavy scope and mounts etc, etc. My .243" is my lightweight go to roe /fox rifle 20" lightweight barrel McMillan hunter stock.the recoil is minimul but i feel i will go 6.5 with it and 120-125gn bullets though as long as plod agrees for foxing too
 
What do you mean when you say a slow heavy bullet? To me this means something like a 300gn doing 2200fps, a calibre like a 45-70. Yes I quite agree that will but a deer down better than a 100gn 243 but apart from the legal aspect it would not be ideal for a longer shot.

what i meant was i do not chase velocity with hunting bullets, and by heavy i meant say 120-180 grns 6.5 - 30 cal stuff- not 55-100 .243" .222" stuff

3000 fps is very fast for an avarage deer bullet say 150 grns - your avarage 22" barrel .308" win could not achieve this generally and safely without resorting to serious handloads with double base powder and a little bit of rain into the action could lead to an accident. I use this as an example only of what i term fast. before anyone responds to that i mean over the chrograph not what it says you can get in some book with your .308" winchester!

2450 - 2600 fps with such a bullet is what i term slow and heavy. in reality the 150 grn .308" used as example only should be perfectly accurate enough at Stalking ranges and plenty flat enough at such speed.

Interestingly when i develop a load for a stalking rifle i don't useually chrnograph the speed - unlike when i develop a target load were i become obsesive about max spread and speed. this is because it don't matter a jot so long as it shoots good groups up to 200yds and isn't going slow enough to tumble on penetration. Incidently didn't Bell like the 6.5 because it cut a clean staight path to the brain - i wonder if this is an advantage in the sweeds penetration and killing reputation it's long pencil like bullet? I have witnessed a stalker become despondent about a load he had used to great effect over a long period of time purely because when he eventually shot it over a chrono he found it was not as fast as he preumed it to be! speed don't kill deer lumps of lead in the right place do!

I do know a few stalkers who like to use .375 h&H and the likes and it is an exelent meat shooting round - however it has a bit of a problem with residual exess energy once it passes through a smaller deer. Agreed without saying that you must always have a good backstop but what if thier is a lump of granite just under that bank of soft earth? The thought worries me personally ( i would still blooming love one though) the 45-70 you mention has killed shed loads of big critters around the world yet fails in our law on speed how dumb is that when you can use .222 and .223 in scotland on roe ? and in England on Munties and water deer soon ?
 
Hi Kent

Since the normal shooting distance I require in Scotland is @ 200+m I prefer a very flat shooting bullet. Having said that I dont as a rule do load development anymore as 2cm groups are fine at 100m.
Conventional shanked bullets at vel>3000 will cause throat erosion and high breach pressures. Banded sub caliber bullets do not due to the extremly small bearing surface in the barrelm, hence longer barrel life than conventional bullets at conventional speeds. How cool is that 8)

Mark
 
bullets

Hi Mark,
You aren't pushing a particular bullet are you? it wouldn't be them copper ones, would it?

steve
 
Not pushing at all heaven forbid :lol: Ramming but bot pushing :-D
Life gets boring if all we talk about is gamekings and ballistic tips. I have boxes full of them which I use only for plinking now.

Seriously I have no commercial interest in the bullets in any way, I pay for them like the rest.

I just think they are more interesting generally and I dont waste lots of powder/range fees or barrel life load developing.

Regards

Mark
 
Thank you folks at home for tunning in, MarkH was brought to you by 'Stay fresh washing powder, for whiter whites and in association with Copper head bullets of Germany 'made for busy guys who want to invade europe and shoot deer' at the same time! :lol: :lol:

I'm sponsored too Mark don't worry about it! Beowulf is sponsored by 'Old Salty' Rough Shag rolling tobacco! :shock: :???: :lol:
 
Mr B

Thanks for clarifying your sponsorship.
All I had been hearing is that you enjoyed a 'rough salty shag' :oops: Thank goodness you meant tobacco.

An added bonus is that barnacles wont grow on copper bullets as we wade our way across the channel. Less barnacles less aerodynamic drag :twisted:

Mark
 
I might get some of those bullets then. Have you got anything for barnacles and other such maritime pest! Last time I looked over my bottom I was covered in them from stem to stern. I even found them up by the 'poop deck'! :shock:
And in case anyone gets the wrong idea I ment 'Ships bottom'! :shock: 'You pervy bunch of landlubbers'! :lol:
 
Kent said:
Thar, this is my point in my experiaces this is incorrect- i listed the bullets i have tried in the .243" i shot a roe about 3-4 wks ago 95gn Nosler b/tip no exit wound- i am talking boiler room i very rarely go to break the shoulders ! This is not an isolated incident.

Then our Experiences differ Kent, I have used 100gn soft points and 95gn Hornady SST on Scottish roe and have never seen one fail to exit I have some 95gn Nosler in the cabinet I have not used them on Roe yet they seemed to group well enough on targets though maybe they have thin jackets? I have shot rutting Sika stags with my 243 and it has put the bullet straight though the boiler room and dropped them on the spot, same with red stags up to 150lbs larder weight, although like I said before a 243 is not my first choice for stags.

I remember reading a not sure if it was a letter or a article my a full time deer manger who had shot over 1,000 deer in the BDS “Deer” magazine he had try most usual calibres and a few wild cats and in the end said that he had shot most of his deer with a plain old boring 243.

Are you trying to say IYHO that a 243 is not suitable for roe and fallow does, red hinds ect?

Kent said:
I hear your point about recoil and spotting the stike but this also relates to the rifle itself my .308" is my lightest recoiling centrefire but it has a heavy 26" barrel and a blooming great big heavy scope and mounts etc, etc. My .243" is my lightweight go to roe /fox rifle 20" lightweight barrel McMillan hunter stock.the recoil is minimul but i feel i will go 6.5 with it and 120-125gn bullets though as long as plod agrees for foxing too

You hear my point but rather than accepting it you dismiss it by Comparing a normal stalking rifle with a 26” barrel target rifle. :roll:

Best rgds

B-b
 
Back
Top