Deer waste requirements for food business

It is simple enough.
True. But you don't seem to get it.

It is all in there....


It is only once you start skinning them or cutting up the meat, or supplying to an AGHE that you must do so.

Without any requirement to register as a food business, because they are not a food business, they are not doing any processing..

Food processing is not the distinction, business is.

If you sell or swap i.e do anything other than give away either in-fur or butchered venison to friends or family you need to register as a food business.

The definition is given in the footnote to Paragraph 17 on p12 of the Wild Game Guide...


1 Under Regulation 178/2002 ‘food business’ means ‘any undertaking, whether for profit or not and whether public or private, carrying out any of the activities related to any stage of production, processing and distribution of food’.

Alan
 
I'd give this to Sharpie on points.

What a shocking piece of writing the wild game guide is, if you read a paragraph twice you get two different interpretations of it.
 
Last edited:
You’re referencing a 12 year old document that is out of date
Give it a rest. It is no more out of date than when it was first published (BTW that is the English Deer Initiative version, largely copied from the Scottish one, but that's another story). Nothing has changed regarding legislation, nor Best Practice, since SNH started it. I was in at the beginning and have the elaborate manual, full colour, every page laminated, three inches thick in the ring-binder, that was produced then, and launched at a rather grand event in the grounds of Balmoral Castle, courtesy of Her Majesty, together with four days of study and practical work in the field. Bringing people up on important stuff such as habitat impact assessment and modern deer management ideas that are required to be followed. In Scotland.

The Scottish Wild Game Guide guide was published December 2021.Everything in there applies throughout GB. If that's not current well I don't know what you want. The English/Welsh one has not been updated since ISTR 2015. and frankly was pretty poor even then.

OK we could carry on arguing, even though I am right and you are wrong (as are BASC, in detail), but that's hardly constructive. It's OK being a contrarian, provided you understand facts.

This discussion is not really about the "primary producer exemption" but the practicalities of setting up as a food business. So please let's not spoil that.
 
The Scottish Wild Game Guide guide was published December 2021.Everything in there applies throughout GB.

Not according to what Food Standards Scotland say on their website: Wild game guides and HACCP | Food Standards Scotland

"People in the rest of the UK should access the wild game guide on the FSA website. It should be noted however, that the food hygiene legal requirements which apply to wild game food production are the same throughout the UK."

So it is only the food hygiene legal requirements that apply throughout the UK, not the contents of the Scottish Wild Game Guide.
 
Last edited:
Nope, a hunter, supplying primary product, un-processed, in the fur or feather carcases, in small quantities, to local retailers, who may then process it themselves (as a food business) for direct sale to the public (not move it on to any other retailer), is not required to register as a food business.
The above is exactly the interpretation of my EHO.
Now, its been a few months since I sat down and read ' The Wild Game guide'. which I read several times back then and if I'm completely honest I had to do so to make sure I thought I understood it correctly.
It is the supplying to an AGHE or skinning and therefore processing which completely changes the requirement.
Now I haven't caught up on all the post after Sharpies statement but will do.
However by pure chance. I made a remark to someone in a pet supply warehouse this morning and the local ferret rescue centre was mentioned. Now I won't say problem solved but having spoke to the centre they are grateful for all donations so heads, scraps and stripped carcass are sorted. I understand the point about ABP carriage and there may be some work but that will hopefully go some way to satisfying my EHO on the waste.
 
Not according to what Food Standards Scotland say on their website: Wild game guides and HACCP | Food Standards Scotland

"People in the rest of the UK should access the wild game guide on the FSA website. It should be noted however, that the food hygiene legal requirements which apply to wild game food production are the same throughout the UK."

So it is only the food hygiene legal requirements that apply throughout the UK, not the contents of the Scottish Wild Game Guide.
They are just being polite. The ancient and rather poor even then English/Wales version is not something that I would choose to reference. Remarkably the Scots have put out a very decent update, which must be galling to the English people entrusted with doing so, but failing to meet any deadlines nor put anything out for consultation in any timely manner.

As they say " It should be noted however, that the food hygiene legal requirements which apply to wild game food production are the same throughout the UK."

Which is why, I said much earlier, that I look to the Scottish one for the current facts. And pay no attention to misinterpretations so widely perpetuated by individuals and at least one shooting organisation.
 
I'd give this to Sharpie on points.

What a shocking piece of writing the wild game guide is, if you read a paragraph twice you get two different interpretations of it.
That's why I read it several times.

So I draw from this. That if we can't agree and we have a very common interest for the facts and understanding to be correct. That it is not surprising that an EHO, despite nearly 40 yrs experience, but who has never dealt with any of the scenarios discussed can have his own interpretation which may equally be affected by his personality and take on hunting.

However I would like to thank all those that replied. Some very helpful and informative advice. Well that's my interpretation on it anyway..
 
Give it a rest. It is no more out of date than when it was first published (BTW that is the English Deer Initiative version, largely copied from the Scottish one, but that's another story). Nothing has changed regarding legislation, nor Best Practice, since SNH started it. I was in at the beginning and have the elaborate manual, full colour, every page laminated, three inches thick in the ring-binder, that was produced then, and launched at a rather grand event in the grounds of Balmoral Castle, courtesy of Her Majesty, together with four days of study and practical work in the field. Bringing people up on important stuff such as habitat impact assessment and modern deer management ideas that are required to be followed. In Scotland.

The Scottish Wild Game Guide guide was published December 2021.Everything in there applies throughout GB. If that's not current well I don't know what you want. The English/Welsh one has not been updated since ISTR 2015. and frankly was pretty poor even then.

OK we could carry on arguing, even though I am right and you are wrong (as are BASC, in detail), but that's hardly constructive. It's OK being a contrarian, provided you understand facts.

This discussion is not really about the "primary producer exemption" but the practicalities of setting up as a food business. So please let's not spoil that.
You were in at the beginning but by your own admission shoot very few deer….

At the end of the day it’s very simple to get registered as a food business to distribute game in the skin so the sensible thing is to do so. Then you know you are on the right side of the law whichever interpretation you ascribe to.
 
They are just being polite. The ancient and rather poor even then English/Wales version is not something that I would choose to reference. Remarkably the Scots have put out a very decent update, which must be galling to the English people entrusted with doing so, but failing to meet any deadlines nor put anything out for consultation in any timely manner.

As they say " It should be noted however, that the food hygiene legal requirements which apply to wild game food production are the same throughout the UK."

Which is why, I said much earlier, that I look to the Scottish one for the current facts. And pay no attention to misinterpretations so widely perpetuated by individuals and at least one shooting organisation.

Funnily enough my EHO happily forwarded me the Wild Game Guide from the FSA website when I went through the process of registering as an FBO. Perhaps you can get in touch with them and put them right?

For someone whose first words on this thread were "I'm no expert" it is encouraging to see that you now know better than both BASC and Food Standards Scotland. :tiphat:
 
Last edited:
True. But you don't seem to get it.

It is all in there....


Tried that one Alan.

Apparently I’ve got it all wrong



Food processing is not the distinction, business is.

If you sell or swap i.e do anything other than give away either in-fur or butchered venison to friends or family you need to register as a food business.

The definition is given in the footnote to Paragraph 17 on p12 of the Wild Game Guide...


1 Under Regulation 178/2002 ‘food business’ means ‘any undertaking, whether for profit or not and whether public or private, carrying out any of the activities related to any stage of production, processing and distribution of food’.

Alan
 
This is for England/Wales.Rules are more stringent in Scotland.
Thank you for that, I have been looking for a document like that for years. I am a bit confused by your last statement as the document says it applies in England, Wales and Scotland ??
 
Yes, so as said it will be down to your local authority.

So perhaps you two can now agree to an honourable draw?
I guess my post (#14) should be updated to reflect yet another potential 🐇 hole!

Oh, and this thread has remarkable similarities with those dealing with a;- GP forms and b;- FAC renewals, but I’ll leave you to guess the common denominator!

K
 
Last edited:
@25 Sharps I know you tried it but I felt it bore repetition because @Sharpie with his apparent skim reading and notorious comprehension dismissed it having confused the meaning of Paragraph 17 by ignoring the word "irrespective".

@Sharpie also only showed the first of the 3 pages of 4.1 in the https://www.foodstandards.gov.scot/downloads/FSS_Wild_Game_Guide-_December_2021.pdf

The remainder of the paragraph he omitted showed that in Scotland you may not have to register with your local authority as a food business selling a deer carcass in fur but that only applies if one of the parties in the transaction is registered as a Venison Dealer. Nice difference?

"Registration as a food business is not required but you are encouraged to contact your Local Authority to ensure you are eligible for this exemption
VDL required if the purchaser isn’t a VDL holder"


Screenshot 2022-05-27 at 17.11.10.png




The VDL may well be the significant difference between the Scots and English legislation...and why the equivalent registration as a food business is specified in the


for anybody selling in-fur or butchered venison.

Alan
 
Last edited:
@25 Sharps I know you tried it but I felt it bore repetition because @Sharpie with his apparent skim reading and notorious comprehension dismissed it having confused the meaning of Paragraph 17 by ignoring the word "irrespective".

@Sharpie also only showed the first of the 3 pages of 4.1 in the https://www.foodstandards.gov.scot/downloads/FSS_Wild_Game_Guide-_December_2021.pdf

The remainder of the paragraph he omitted showed that in Scotland you may not have to register with your local authority as a food business selling a deer carcass in fur but that only applies if one of the parties in the transaction is registered as a Venison Dealer. Nice difference?

"Registration as a food business is not required but you are encouraged to contact your Local Authority to ensure you are eligible for this exemption
VDL required if the purchaser isn’t a VDL holder"


View attachment 258414




The VDL may well be the significant difference between the Scots and English legislation...and why the equivalent registration as a food business is specified in the


for anybody selling in-fur or butchered venison.

Alan
In this instance I am not guilty of "apparent skim reading". I have studied the Scottish WGG virtually since the day it came out, nevertheless I do not claim to be an expert on the legislation. I am just as capable of mis-interpretation as others posting on this thread.

Initially I contributed to the OP's request for information about the rules applying to disposal of deer waste, where I hope I provided a steer. Which then touched on the applicability of the Hunter/Primary Producer's exemption for supply of in-fur or feather unprocessed carcases

I drew everyone's attention to the most recent Scottish WGG, in my post #9 on Thursday, and recommended using that as the source, rather than the England/Wales version that everybody seems to like to quote. But it is well out of date, inconsistent, ambiguous and self contradictory in parts. And recognised as being long-overdue an update.

It was promised to have been updated some time ago, but hasn't happened yet. Whereas the Scots have done so, their new version is six years in advance of the old 2015 England/Wales version and I think gives greater clarity.

1653727126718.webp

If you want to know where things stand on the consultation about the draft revised England/Wales guide, you can download the responses that consultation from Supply of wild game for human consumption I do not have sight of that draft. The consultation closed in September 2020, same timescale as the Scottish one.

As yet no word of when the final document might be released, nor even a second draft yet.

Subsequently @25 Sharps chipped in by saying that "Wrong, the Hunters’ bullet demotion doesn’t exist any more " Which is incorrect

Naturally , me being me, I felt the need to challenge him on that statement, which then escalated into the tiresome ding-dong between us. With him showing the flow chart in the old guide that in fact confirms exactly what I have been saying.

Now that you have had a day or so to skim it, you have discovered the key difference under Scottish legislation, which anyone shooting deer in Scotland knows about, it is not a new thing. I.e. the Venison Dealers License VDL.

Which I thought I had made clear when I said yesterday in post #29 "take a look at the current modern Scottish Wild Game guide. (the rules are the same throughout GB), though the Scots have the added complication of Venison dealer licensing)"

But perhaps you skimmed over that nugget.

Simply put, Scotland has historically had a problem with poaching, where the VDL is intended to break that chain. By requiring at least one party in the transaction to hold a VDL, even for direct sale to the consumer. Not so in England/Wales. They also have anti-poaching legislation for Salmon tagging, see The Salmon Carcass Tagging (Scotland) Regulations 2016

The Primary Producer's Exemption is enshrined in EU and UK law. Some countries such as Scotland may also impose their own restrictions over and above that such as the VDL. Just as, since Brexit, GB may now deviate from EU legislation (NI will still be held to it). But in reality I do not expect to see much change, in the future.

The intention of the Hunter's exemption is that hunters/hunting parties even estates, be allowed to sell their primary production direct to the consumer, or direct to local retailers without any restriction, other than to maintain safety and traceability, which I suggested is as simple as keeping larder records, accounts, invoices, receipts etc.

One may supply either directly to the consumer, or to a retailer. And of course not to an AGHE, that has to be a business to business transaction.

Below are direct quotes from the guide.

Primary wild game products are the products of hunting. This means in fur/feather game
that has undergone no more than any necessary preparation that is part of normal hunting
practice. Such preparation includes bleeding and evisceration (or ‘gralloching’), which is
the removal of green offal from large wild game, and is normally carried out either “in the
field” or in a game larder. Consequently, game larders, where preparation as part of
normal hunting practices takes place, are also defined as part of primary production.

Supply must be of small quantities of in fur/feather wild game Supply must be to direct to final consumers or local retail

Small quantities are regarded as self-defining in Scotland as the demand for in
fur/feather wild game from final consumers and local establishments is limited. Local is
defined as supply within one’s own Local Authority, a neighbouring Local Authority or 50
km/30 miles from the boundary of your Local Authority. Local in relation to Scotland’s
Island Local Authorities refers to the whole of Scotland. There is no local restriction
applied to direct sales to the final consumer, but the legal requirement remains to ensure
that any food supplied is safe.


In England/Wales much the same, except defined by county boundaries.

Trained Hunter status: Not required but encouraged

Registration as a food business is not required but you are encouraged to contact your Local Authority

You do not require a food safety management system based on HACCP principles.

Must maintain traceability records of supply


4.3 Direct supply of small quantities of in fur/feather wild game
carcases to the final consumer or local retail establishments
If you are a primary producer, estate or shoot that supplies all of your in fur/feather wild
game carcases, without any further processing (i.e. skinning, plucking etc.), directly
to the final consumer, or local retail establishments who directly supply the final consumer
(such as butchers or restaurants):
 You must abide by the requirements of Retained Regulation 178/2002, including
the legal obligation to supply safe food and maintain traceability
You are exempt from the requirements of Retained Regulation 852/2004 and
Retained Regulation 853/2004 as set out in Article 1(2)(c) and Article 1(3)(c)

respectively.
This exemption only applies to the direct supply of small quantities of in fur/feather wild
game (i.e. primary products).

Examples of local retail establishments who may supply the final consumer are
restaurants, butchers and farm shops. These local retail establishments must be
registered as food businesses with their Local Authority
.

Primary producers who wish to operate under this exemption are encouraged to contact
their Local Authority to ensure that the exemption does apply to their operations. Local
Authorities can also assist primary producers in understanding the food safety and
traceability requirements
which apply to them under Retained Regulation 178/2002.
Primary producers operating under this exemption still need to demonstrate traceability in
their supply has been maintained in line with Article 18 of Retained Regulation 178/2002
and section 9 of this guide.


It is simple enough to understand. I, without needing any qualifications (though in fact I am a trained hunter with I think sufficient experience and mentoring by the Deer Keeper of a very large estate, who guided me whilst I shot twelve deer with him) may, for example, shoot a deer in Kent or West Sussex, gralloch it on the spot or in a nearby larder, take it home to East Sussex and sell it to a member of the public, or my local butcher, pub, restaurant, farm shop etc. (All of course being food businesses themselves) No unnecessary legislation applies. No trained Hunter, No food business, no HACCP, no inspection of my game larder (AKA chiller, in my case). No commercial waste disposal as long as its no more than 20kg/week.

Only traceability records.

Whereas if I shot it in North Norfolk I am not allowed to bring it home and do so. Not local. Must only be for my own personal consumption or that of family and friends.

Just as, say, my own freezer running low, I might call a contact, an individual or an estate, to ask whether they might have a carcase for me to purchase, or maybe go out and shoot one for me, ready for me to pick up when I was travelling through. They could also be operating under the primary producer exemption. Might even, once I'd paid for it, then ask them to help me skin and quarter it for for easier transportation, or at least let me use their larder to do so myself, even completely butcher it myself, which used to be a regular thing for me.

Nowadays this is how I obtain most of my venison, for me, my family and friends. Much less expensive for me than stalking it myself.

This is just how I like to operate, as uncomplicatedly as possible. Using the exemption. For others circumstances are different. If I were to be doing this on anything more than my hobby scale I would certainly contact my EHO for advice and support to carry on without the need to register as a food business. As I know several others are doing, with the approval of their EHO. It is allowed. And possibly less work for the pragmatic EHO.

Correct me if I am wrong, of course, I daresay some will continue to do so.
 
The VDL may well be the significant difference between the Scots and English legislation...and why the equivalent registration as a food business is specified in the


for anybody selling in-fur or butchered venison.

Alan
May well be ? Or maybe not. The VDL is nothing to do with food business registration, that's a separate matter. It is all about keeping records of transactions, as well as ensuring that the criminal element are barred from holding one.

Go to Venison Dealer's Licence download the application form and read it. You'll see what I am getting at.

Forget about butchered venison, that's not the subject of this discussion.

As I understand it the England/Wales rules are identical. Except that we don't need a VDL.

To sell to a retailer, that retailer will be a food business themselves, so will have their own procedures for dealing with primary produce, and make their own decisions as to whether they want to buy it from someone using the exemption. Just as a final consumer is free to take their own view on whether they wish to purchase directly from someone operating under the exemption.
 
But perhaps you skimmed over that nugget.
Touché -ish....you mentioned it but apparently disregarded its implication.

I repeat, it is still perfectly legal for a stalker without any formal qualifications, to shoot a deer, gralloch it, cut off the head and feet, then sell it to a local retailer. Or direct to a member of the public. Without any requirement to register as a food business, because they are not a food business, they are not doing any processing..

You still don't believe me ? Well take a look at the current modern Scottish Wild Game guide. (the rules are the same throughout GB), though the Scots have the added complication of Venison dealer licensing)

The "added complication" in Scotland is the option of registering with the local authority and paying for a Venison Dealer Licence instead of registering with the local authority as a food business if you want to sell direct to the public...From the food safety / traceability point of view I can't see any actual difference between registering as a food business selling venison and registering as a Venison Dealer.

Simply that outside of Scotland the distinction with meat from wild game is not made. You point about it being a measure against poaching is believable.

The points that I understood from when I skim read/studied the wild game guide a few years ago were that:-

1, from the food safety / traceability point of view, any venison being sold to a member of the public needs to have gone through a registered food business (or VDL holder in Scotland).

2, if any transaction involved sale or reward i.e. not gifts to friends or family, then the seller was indeed a food business and must be registered.

3, The references to local were to prevent the risks involved with small producers who did not have chilled transport shipping venison over great distances.

Correct me if I am wrong, of course,

Likewise.

Alan
 
Go to Venison Dealer's Licence download the application form and read it. You'll see what I am getting at.

I did and was surprised that although they mainly refer to "venison" throughout, curiously the record form that they require a VDL to complete refers to where the "deer" came from rather than the venison. So they were apparently not including other wild game meat under the catch-all definition of venison.

Which means that the reference in the FSS Guide 4.1 to the requirement of a VDL may not apply to feathered wild game carcasses. Although, as they are listed together, they do not make the same distinction in that document.

Hmmm.

Alan
 
The exemption, as I understand it, is codified in REGULATION (EC) No 852/2004 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 29 April 2004 on the hygiene of foodstuffs

1653734561631.png
This is the regulation that covers all the hygiene stuff that is relevant to a food business operator. From which primary producers are exempted. As stated above. 2004 is still the current version.

It is worth reading it all actually, here is a link to it, and what we retained after Brexit. It's a pretty good guide to everything that you might expect an EHO to be considering if you do decide to set up as a food business. https://webarchive.nationalarchives...content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02004R0852-20090420

Or here is the EU version: EUR-Lex - 32004R0852 - EN - EUR-Lex

Any EHO should be totally familiar with it, after all it is the basis of their work. Just point them to Chapter 1, Article 1, paragraph 2 if they aren't yet familiar with that part.

The Wild Game Guides are just that, guides. They do reference the actual legislation, but present it in a more user friendly manner, specific to the wild game sector only. Nevertheless it is the exact wording of the legislation that matters, in case of any ambiguity or mis-interpretation in the guides.

Clearly the Scottish WGG states that, in Scotland at least, it is not necessary to register as a food business. Though to sell to the public or retail a VDL is required, which is not comparable to food business registration (involving such stuff as HACCP etc.). Merely a record keeping exercise and the obligation to submit such records as an annual return.

You fill in the form and pay the fee. Set by your local council. Then, assuming you are not a criminal, you are issued with it.

As to whether there is any over riding national legislation in England/Wales that mandates registration as a food business for primary producers, if there is I am not aware of it. If so, perhaps somebody could point it out to us and I'll retract every foolish word that I have spoken.

Supplying an AGHE is different. That has to be business-to-business.

NatureScot require all licensed venison dealers in Scotland to submit their records of all purchases and receipts of venison for the period 1 April – 31 March each year. This is so that they can monitor as complete a picture as possible of the quantity and source regions of all venison sold in Scotland. This is another reason for the VDL. They are specifically interested in venison. That is what a VDL applies to, not to birds. Neither AFAIK do you need a license to buy or sell birds, in the feather, in Scotland to the public or to retailers.

Deer returns

This record specifically:

1653735911866.png

I believe that they are using the word Venison correctly in it's modern way. I think we all know what it means. You can argue maybe that wild boar is also venison if you like, maybe even wild goat, but to try to argue that game birds are also venison is reductio ad absurdum.

Venison, (from Latin venatus, “to hunt”), the meat from any kind of deer; originally, the term referred to any kind of edible game.

Bottom line is that, until the new England/Wales WGG is issued, we won't really know the situation. Meanwhile I still believe that the Hunters exemption continues to apply here.

I would also be interested to know how the exemption is also applied, interpreted, even ignored, in the various EU countries. And to what extent the exemption has lead to any significant public health problems, both here and abroad, that would justify its removal. Meanwhile I will continue to use it, in my personal circumstances, and pay no attention to sweeping generalisations that seek to deny its existence.
 
Last edited:
In this instance I am not guilty of "apparent skim reading". I have studied the Scottish WGG virtually since the day it came out, nevertheless I do not claim to be an expert on the legislation. I am just as capable of mis-interpretation as others posting on this thread.

Initially I contributed to the OP's request for information about the rules applying to disposal of deer waste, where I hope I provided a steer. Which then touched on the applicability of the Hunter/Primary Producer's exemption for supply of in-fur or feather unprocessed carcases

I drew everyone's attention to the most recent Scottish WGG, in my post #9 on Thursday, and recommended using that as the source, rather than the England/Wales version that everybody seems to like to quote. But it is well out of date, inconsistent, ambiguous and self contradictory in parts. And recognised as being long-overdue an update.

It was promised to have been updated some time ago, but hasn't happened yet. Whereas the Scots have done so, their new version is six years in advance of the old 2015 England/Wales version and I think gives greater clarity.

View attachment 258493

If you want to know where things stand on the consultation about the draft revised England/Wales guide, you can download the responses that consultation from Supply of wild game for human consumption I do not have sight of that draft. The consultation closed in September 2020, same timescale as the Scottish one.

As yet no word of when the final document might be released, nor even a second draft yet.

Subsequently @25 Sharps chipped in by saying that "Wrong, the Hunters’ bullet demotion doesn’t exist any more " Which is incorrect

Naturally , me being me, I felt the need to challenge him on that statement, which then escalated into the tiresome ding-dong between us. With him showing the flow chart in the old guide that in fact confirms exactly what I have been saying.

Now that you have had a day or so to skim it, you have discovered the key difference under Scottish legislation, which anyone shooting deer in Scotland knows about, it is not a new thing. I.e. the Venison Dealers License VDL.

Which I thought I had made clear when I said yesterday in post #29 "take a look at the current modern Scottish Wild Game guide. (the rules are the same throughout GB), though the Scots have the added complication of Venison dealer licensing)"

But perhaps you skimmed over that nugget.

Simply put, Scotland has historically had a problem with poaching, where the VDL is intended to break that chain. By requiring at least one party in the transaction to hold a VDL, even for direct sale to the consumer. Not so in England/Wales. They also have anti-poaching legislation for Salmon tagging, see The Salmon Carcass Tagging (Scotland) Regulations 2016

The Primary Producer's Exemption is enshrined in EU and UK law. Some countries such as Scotland may also impose their own restrictions over and above that such as the VDL. Just as, since Brexit, GB may now deviate from EU legislation (NI will still be held to it). But in reality I do not expect to see much change, in the future.

The intention of the Hunter's exemption is that hunters/hunting parties even estates, be allowed to sell their primary production direct to the consumer, or direct to local retailers without any restriction, other than to maintain safety and traceability, which I suggested is as simple as keeping larder records, accounts, invoices, receipts etc.

One may supply either directly to the consumer, or to a retailer. And of course not to an AGHE, that has to be a business to business transaction.

Below are direct quotes from the guide.

Primary wild game products are the products of hunting. This means in fur/feather game
that has undergone no more than any necessary preparation that is part of normal hunting
practice. Such preparation includes bleeding and evisceration (or ‘gralloching’), which is
the removal of green offal from large wild game, and is normally carried out either “in the
field” or in a game larder. Consequently, game larders, where preparation as part of
normal hunting practices takes place, are also defined as part of primary production.

Supply must be of small quantities of in fur/feather wild game Supply must be to direct to final consumers or local retail

Small quantities are regarded as self-defining in Scotland as the demand for in
fur/feather wild game from final consumers and local establishments is limited. Local is
defined as supply within one’s own Local Authority, a neighbouring Local Authority or 50
km/30 miles from the boundary of your Local Authority. Local in relation to Scotland’s
Island Local Authorities refers to the whole of Scotland. There is no local restriction
applied to direct sales to the final consumer, but the legal requirement remains to ensure
that any food supplied is safe.


In England/Wales much the same, except defined by county boundaries.

Trained Hunter status: Not required but encouraged

Registration as a food business is not required but you are encouraged to contact your Local Authority

You do not require a food safety management system based on HACCP principles.

Must maintain traceability records of supply


4.3 Direct supply of small quantities of in fur/feather wild game
carcases to the final consumer or local retail establishments
If you are a primary producer, estate or shoot that supplies all of your in fur/feather wild
game carcases, without any further processing (i.e. skinning, plucking etc.), directly
to the final consumer, or local retail establishments who directly supply the final consumer
(such as butchers or restaurants):
 You must abide by the requirements of Retained Regulation 178/2002, including
the legal obligation to supply safe food and maintain traceability
You are exempt from the requirements of Retained Regulation 852/2004 and
Retained Regulation 853/2004 as set out in Article 1(2)(c) and Article 1(3)(c)

respectively.
This exemption only applies to the direct supply of small quantities of in fur/feather wild
game (i.e. primary products).

Examples of local retail establishments who may supply the final consumer are
restaurants, butchers and farm shops. These local retail establishments must be
registered as food businesses with their Local Authority
.

Primary producers who wish to operate under this exemption are encouraged to contact
their Local Authority to ensure that the exemption does apply to their operations. Local
Authorities can also assist primary producers in understanding the food safety and
traceability requirements
which apply to them under Retained Regulation 178/2002.
Primary producers operating under this exemption still need to demonstrate traceability in
their supply has been maintained in line with Article 18 of Retained Regulation 178/2002
and section 9 of this guide.


It is simple enough to understand. I, without needing any qualifications (though in fact I am a trained hunter with I think sufficient experience and mentoring by the Deer Keeper of a very large estate, who guided me whilst I shot twelve deer with him) may, for example, shoot a deer in Kent or West Sussex, gralloch it on the spot or in a nearby larder, take it home to East Sussex and sell it to a member of the public, or my local butcher, pub, restaurant, farm shop etc. (All of course being food businesses themselves) No unnecessary legislation applies. No trained Hunter, No food business, no HACCP, no inspection of my game larder (AKA chiller, in my case). No commercial waste disposal as long as its no more than 20kg/week.

Only traceability records.

Whereas if I shot it in North Norfolk I am not allowed to bring it home and do so. Not local. Must only be for my own personal consumption or that of family and friends.

Just as, say, my own freezer running low, I might call a contact, an individual or an estate, to ask whether they might have a carcase for me to purchase, or maybe go out and shoot one for me, ready for me to pick up when I was travelling through. They could also be operating under the primary producer exemption. Might even, once I'd paid for it, then ask them to help me skin and quarter it for for easier transportation, or at least let me use their larder to do so myself, even completely butcher it myself, which used to be a regular thing for me.

Nowadays this is how I obtain most of my venison, for me, my family and friends. Much less expensive for me than stalking it myself.

This is just how I like to operate, as uncomplicatedly as possible. Using the exemption. For others circumstances are different. If I were to be doing this on anything more than my hobby scale I would certainly contact my EHO for advice and support to carry on without the need to register as a food business. As I know several others are doing, with the approval of their EHO. It is allowed. And possibly less work for the pragmatic EHO.

Correct me if I am wrong, of course, I daresay some will continue to do so.
Shall we put this on pause until the new, hopefully more clear, guidance is published ?
 
Back
Top