Its a tough one! However think how much worse it could get if the worst happens ? A hard discussion but it will be a lot harder if its say a child.this is quite relevant to me as my father (82 this month) in my opinion should not be driving(i won't travel in a vehicle with him or allow my daughter to) , he has already had a cyclist off his bike then left the scene plus a few minor scrapes. the signs are all there.....
its a really tough one because if i report him our already terrible relationship will likely be done forever and he has a god complex so cannot see any wrong in anything he does ever !
any rules they bring in like annual tests after 70 etc can only be a good thing in my opinion because currently the system relys on friends/relatives reporting them or a random stop check or worse still a post accident check.
And cyclists with those dazzling lights strapped on their heads.We had that very discussion last night, driving back from a day out in 'Town".
Not a fan of driving at night any more. I think the 'new' headlights are way too bright, and not helped by the pricks who add fogs lights into the equation.
Yeah very true ! Once i have phoned the police to report a genuine case of someone way past being a competent driver . Apparently the cops already knew about them and where already on with getting in touch with the rest of the family, apparently its very, very difficult to slap a driving ban on anyone who is driving "within the law " I mean this old girl was doing speed in the teens at best on an open road no traffic only the big tailback behind her LOLIts just another excuse to take away our freedom. As far as I can see we are all being led up a never ending path of loosing our rights to choose what we want, where we want it and how we want it, by every government that comes along.
I see today that the SNP are now banning all log burners in any new development. Every time one looks, there's another piece of our freedom to choose taken away.
Freedom in this country is becoming rare. And public transport for many is a joke, so why shouldn't any person over 70 be allowed to carry on driving, as long as they are physically able to do so.
as long as they are physically able to do so.
Granted this does occur, but I doubt it out weighs those on the road that drink and drive, or take drugs. I heard a short while ago that an estimated 1 million plus drivers are not even insured, whether this is true or not I don't know. But that's a lot of uninsured people, rarely would I think an elderly person be uninsured?So this is the key. How many times do you hear about pensioners caught going the wrong way on the road or hitting cyclists, then when they get stopped by the police, find that they can't even read a licence plate from about 5 paces away.
Last time I went into the opticians, this came up in conversation, and they were telling me how they cannot legally report someone who fails their eye test (for driving standard) and subsequently refuses to get their eyes corrected (whether by glasses or contacts) - due to patient confidentiality. Meanwhile, plod gets a bell the second we mention the word Depression in ear shot of the GP...
I am fine with the elderly driving, and whilst sight loss (and other driving conditions notifiable to the DVLA like seizures etc) do occur to plenty under 70, I would suspect it is significantly more common the older you get (especially sight conditions...). However, as it stands, unless the person in question grasses themselves up to the DVLA on things like this, mandatory re-testing is the only way to catch them out.
Granted this does occur, but I doubt it out weighs those on the road that drink and drive, or take drugs. I heard a short while ago that an estimated 1 million plus drivers are not even insured, whether this is true or not I don't know. But that's a lot of uninsured people, rarely would I think an elderly person be uninsured?
I have my regular eye sight test, and passed with flying colours late last year. To be honest it did come up in conversation regarding reporting people who had failed the eye test. I cant remember what was said about reporting it to the authorities, you may well be right.
However I think it would be unfair and certainly expensive and time consuming to ask those over 70 to take a re test. I think it also falls to a certain extent on the family's responsability to advice the senior family member to pack up driving, if they are incapable of doing so safely.
Ha, but cars are made by drivers and drivers are not.Hmmm.
Interesting juxtaposition - cars are tested for fitness to be driven at only three years of age then annually thereafter but drivers……..
![]()
Yep, the responsibility for informing DVLA about any medical condition that would affect your ability to drive lies with the licence holder.Last time I went into the opticians, this came up in conversation, and they were telling me how they cannot legally report someone who fails their eye test (for driving standard) and subsequently refuses to get their eyes corrected (whether by glasses or contacts) - due to patient confidentiality. Meanwhile, plod gets a bell the second we mention the word Depression in ear shot of the GP...
Yep, the responsibility for informing DVLA about any medical condition that would affect your ability to drive lies with the licence holder.
However, in your discussion with the optician, what happens if the patient just takes the eye exam prescription, and gets glasses made elsewhere? Not a totally cut and dried situation anymore.
Yep, agreed. Would we be better if we did like we see on all the US programs, and do an eye test at a local DVLA office?Not to mention h
That's the legal rationale behind the optician not taking it further. However, they did confide that they have had patients in who do not meet driving standard, but steadfastly do not believe it wrong, "because well I can still see can't I!". And it's those ones which are challenging...
Yep, agreed. Would we be better if we did like we see on all the US programs, and do an eye test at a local DVLA office?