Woodsmoke
Well-Known Member
Or those with a sense of humour . . .A little-known fact is that it can also expose one to an attack of pedants.
Or those with a sense of humour . . .A little-known fact is that it can also expose one to an attack of pedants.
You're talking complete and wilful nonsense. 10% ytd is entirely within the bounds of normal movement for blue chip stocks. 36 of the other 99 blue chips have increased by more than that in the last 6mths alone.
You're determined to believe that there's some sort of big pharma conspiracy and therefore refuse to accept the facts and insist on believing complete nonsense. It takes less than a minute to prove your claims are piffle. Ffs.
Common sense is taking protective precautions. Taking ineffective precautions is a matter of personal preference. Insisting on ineffective precautions is stupidity.We here will continue to wear our face coverings whilst in close contact with others in crowded areas, fortunately we don’t frequent many such places living here but if the need arises we will, to us it’s just a common sense approach !
It makes no difference if he has or not.I hear our latest Health Minister Sajid Javid has tested positive and he’s had both vaccines, now self isolating, l wonder if he’s been wearing his face covering or not ?
It seems to becoming harder and harder to retain our sense of humour……thank goodness for “Woody” !
Main reason most masks are useless is because the are not of merchantable quality for the job they’re trying to do.All this was well known before covid came along and the reasoned medical and scientific consensus (as opposed to the brainless hysteria currently favoured) was that wearing masks in daily life was completely pointless.
It's a new type of coronavirus, not a complete reversal of the Enlightenment. We might as well burn witches again to be on the safe side.
From the Daily Mail today 18.07.2021.Bugger only knows if I will be able to come over to UK in early August as they (Boris cronies) change their minds daily.
I don't think anyone maintained that the jabs would prevent you catching the virus - what was said is that the jabs would reduce the deadlier effects of the virus and the number of deaths which currently it seems to be doingFirstly I have no axe to grind re big pharma I hold some of their stocks and doubtless the baskets used for the old mans pension contain a shedload seen as he worked for one of them doesn’t matter one jot to me if they make money in fact it’s in my interests. They are just doing what they do and if you think 10% ytd is sustainable year on year for blue chips then fair enough I don’t you’re entitled to your opinion but it doesn’t change the fact that if invermectic was a wonder drug then well that wouldn’t work out to well financially for the big players.
Yet again just because some dares disagree with the status quo their a conspiracy nut.
On a slightly lighter note I see The Saj has just been diagnosed with the rona after both jabs. Absolute con job take it and still get it. So share price might be battered Monday.
There seems to be a large variety of available masks and no doubt some are better than others. - surely some of them must be effective and it stands to reason that whatever mask you wear, it has to reduce the spread of the moisture from one's breath which is apparently what carries the virus.Common sense is taking protective precautions. Taking ineffective precautions is a matter of personal preference. Insisting on ineffective precautions is stupidity.
It makes no difference if he has or not.
Camodog has nailed it. Furthermore, have you noticed how the initial importance of hand hygiene; when did you last see someone wearing latex gloves in a Supermarket or on Public Transport, is now a very second to face coverings.My observation of the overwhelming majority of people wearing 'face-coverings' is that they have one mask, and one mask only. It is then stuffed in and out of pockets, handbags, taken from the dashboard, driving mirror, glove-box, car-seat...etc etc. I do not regard this as particularly hygienic nor healthy.
Camodog...i totally agree mate...life is for living...we must get back to normal soon or i believe we will be lost for a very long time...the toll on the nations physical and mental health is going to only get worse if things go on as they are...70/80% of the nation is jabbed now after a tremendous effort by the NHS so lets as camodog says 'crack on'....H.we must simply 'crack-on' and get back to living !
And hand sanitizers seem everywhere to have disappeared if the UK is anything like here in Germany.Camodog...i totally agree mate...life is for living...we must get back to normal soon or i believe we will be lost for a very long time...the toll on the nations physical and mental health is going to only get worse if things go on as they are...70/80% of the nation is jabbed now after a tremendous effort by the NHS so lets as camodog says 'crack on'....H.
I’ll continue to wear one in public places with high densities of people….although the rules are sometimes a bit odd - wear a mask walking through a restaurant full of people but you are okay to remove it as soon as your bum touched the seat at your table….seems odd!
regards,
Gixer
No, there is a specific exemption for hauliers, providing they follow the rules:BTW are all the international truck drivers delivering the UKs food needs of spanish sausage/french cheese/german beer all being forced into this 10 days worth of hotel isolation?
I have just noticed that my post has been moderator-edited.It only has a 13% efficacy in stopping you catching Covid after the second vaccination. What it is good at is preventing death.
Moderator Edit: Age 65+
![]()
EMA approves AZ’s COVID-19 vaccine – including for over-65s
The EMA has approved AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine for use in the EU in all adults aged over 18, despite assertions in Germany this week that it shouldn’t be used in elderly people. The conditional marketing authorisation makes AZD1222 the third coronavirus vaccine to be approved for EU use...pharmaphorum.com