simgre
Well-Known Member
Israel thread anyone?
Now you see, why would you want to poke someone into a reaction…? Shame in polite discourse you look for cheap points.
Israel thread anyone?
I think you should re evaluate your personal safety, I guess I should prefer I was kicked in the head, instead of having a loaded firearm pointed at me.Now you see, why would you want to poke someone into a reaction…? Shame in polite discourse you look for cheap points.
you forgot to say it’s part and parcel of living in a big citySo you would rather an unarmed neighbourhood car attended, because non attendance should not be an option? And on arrival discover the report is a couple of Albanian drug dealers hiding their stash in the woods? Or a couple of blokes testing their reactivated/printed firearms? Or a couple of extreme right wing or Islamist potential terrorists “training in the woods”? Or even a couple of miscreants had hit the OP over the head and stolen their firearms?
Fact is, the police attended a “firearms call”, they would have been remiss in attending any other way. As the OP said, the police were polite, efficient and when discovered there were. I offences apologised for the inconvenience. Where’s the issue?
“We who live in the country…” no, stuff is different now. My first magnum revolver was delivered to my door by the postman, long since done.
And yes, I’ve have had guns pointed at me before and I have had the police respond to me on my permission. Expect it, or stay on the target range.
Hmmmm, perhaps they do, poor light, subdued clothing, back to the officer.I forgot to add, the British countryside is often populated by Fox & Deer controllers, and they resemble not, armed players in Crossmaglen or the Bogside .. an obvious threat deserves an at the ready to fire ........... someone burying a gralloch isn't burying a cache so should be given the safety of a muzzle down approach.
Maybe on the approach?, but face to face, you got a death wish?Hmmmm, perhaps they do, poor light, subdued clothing, back to the officer.

As you say, there may be more to it, but on face value it seems ridiculous.I don't know any more than is in this article but it does seem things are getting a bit ridiculous - Man arrested on suspicion of carrying air rifle in York
A man was arrested for carrying a gun in a bag, didn't take the gun out of the bag and didn't threaten anyone...but was arrested anyway!? What the actual charge was it doesn't say and maybe (hopefully) there is more to it but on face value this seems insane.
I grew up in a village not far from York and remember the shoot coming in for a drink afterwards, all with shotguns in slips. God knows what would happen now, I expect the place would be surrounded with armed police...
That applies to a firearm in a sporting purpose. A firearm used as a weapon will be pointed at numerous people as a precautionary measure. Sighting systems will be used as observation aids to point weapons at individuals with no intent to shoot.The issue for me is that those of us that grew up with firearms and and have a traditional shooting background have had it drummed into us that you don’t point a gun at something you don’t intend to shoot, and never ever ever allow your gun to be pointed or swung past a person. It is part of our being and is so ingrained it causes outrage, rightly in my opinion, when it happens. Regardless of the circumstance.
Someone burying a cache of drugs, cash, illegal weapons may in fact resemble a deer stalker burying a gralloch.I forgot to add, the British countryside is often populated by Fox & Deer controllers, and they resemble not, armed players in Crossmaglen or the Bogside .. an obvious threat deserves an at the ready to fire ........... someone burying a gralloch isn't burying a cache so should be given the safety of a muzzle down approach.
Or even nerfarious intent....However, the recurring theme here is that it’s a member or members of the public who call police to complain about these things, in this case, “a report of young people with a suspected firearm”… Do police go in with the ‘it probably isn’t’ attitude? That’s safer for the innocent toy gun owner, or legitimate hunter, but not safer for anyone if the subject has nefarious intent. I know what I’d prefer as a tax payer.