Hornady 75 grain Amax

andybrock

Well-Known Member
Im getting to the end of my stash of 75g amax I use in a .223 mainly for foxing, is the ELD M the same bullet? I’ve read in a couple of posts that said the eld m doesn’t perform quite as well as the amax expansion wise in the smaller calibres? Anyone used these in the smaller calibres?
 
Im getting to the end of my stash of 75g amax I use in a .223 mainly for foxing, is the ELD M the same bullet? I’ve read in a couple of posts that said the eld m doesn’t perform quite as well as the amax expansion wise in the smaller calibres? Anyone used these in the smaller calibres?
What load do you use for these out of interest? In currently trying to work one out as I've a few boxes of amax, but not getting acceptable groups so far with N140
 
How big are your fox's?

There is that, but I was wondering how many foxes are shot over about 200m where better BC and more downrange energy starts to kick in, in any meaningful way?
Reading many posts on here, I have this image of small fields, difficult topography, lots of natural and built obstacles, poor light and shitty weather. Not exactly the stuff of long range opportunities.
 
There is that, but I was wondering how many foxes are shot over about 200m where better BC and more downrange energy starts to kick in, in any meaningful way?
Reading many posts on here, I have this image of small fields, difficult topography, lots of natural and built obstacles, poor light and shitty weather. Not exactly the stuff of long range opportunities.
Not all about distance, a higher bc bullet is less affected by wind
 
Splitting hairs, one still has to allow just like we all do with gravity.
Better isn't always more and more isn't always better.
More often than not the choices are just different choices.
If someone said when asked why, they said "because I can", I'd be fine with it.
With exception to special twist rates on a larger volume .224" cartridge the heavy .224" bullets are not going to offer any advantage in the usual British hunting scene outside of border line non ethical shots.
Non ethical being, gusty wind at variable directions. Ranging errors. Animal welfare if wounded.
Of course the above is just my opinion and accounts for little to nothing at all.
 
Splitting hairs, one still has to allow just like we all do with gravity.
Gravity is a constant, wind isn't. Its not a massive advantage, but its less of a problem. Not everyone shoots on small enclosed fields and woodlands. While I agree the majority of my shots are less than 200y, its nice to have the option to push a little further if needed, moorland would be an example of this
 
Back
Top