Mike, I did ask for the cost to be kept at about the same but they said a course couldn't be done for less, The DMQ bit is £45 for registration, B & B for two people to present it, a glossy booklet to go with it.I notice that there's quite a jump in price for the new HAD course as opposed to the old one (from £95 to £150).



What are the details of this pleaseIf your Hampshire based you maybe interested in doing this course.
This is the new DMQ HAD award course
This is a recognised qualification as a requisite to join the Hampshire led scheme.
![]()
Humane Animal Dispatch Award - East Stratton, Hampshire - The British Deer Society
Deer Management Qualification – Humane Animal Dispatch Award This police led national qualification is essential as a pre-requisite for those involved in supporting the Police at emergency incidents where injured deer are caught up on road networks and within rural or urban environments. Why is...bds.org.uk
Yes agreed that can be a problem sometimes in an urban setting, In Hampshire the police are always at the scene before a HAD is called, If the HAD feels he's not comfy with members of the public around the area then he would ask for the area to be cleared, it would be the same if the AR did the job they would clear the area every time.Don't mean to hijack this thread but why anyone in this day and age with everyone and their granny taking their mobiles out to film everything and liability issues, volunteers for this (and for free) is beyond me.
I understand the whole not wanting to let an animal suffer etc but there is just too much risk to yourself.
I understand the whole not wanting to let an animal suffer etc but there is just too much risk to yourself.
Trouble is the slightest alleged issue and your FAC is gone until the Police decide to do a review- at there on leisure.- I do sometimes feel that folk are afraid of their own shadow when it comes to 'risking' their FAC/SGC.
Sad to read that you feel this way.
Very glad that others are prepared to minimise any animal's suffering.
I have no idea what the data may be, on any real 'risk' anybody has ever encountered - I do sometimes feel that folk are afraid of their own shadow when it comes to 'risking' their FAC/SGC.
My guess is yess but may open the door to another “ Badge” boomDoes this make the 'Deer vehicles Collision HAD' certificate irrelevant? Done by the BDS
Sadly this isn't the case.
I emailed Hampshire firearms licensing. They said yes that course is not recognised by them anymore if you wanted to join there scheme.My guess is yess but may open the door to another “ Badge” boom![]()
Which course is not recognised by them anymore?I emailed Hampshire firearms licensing. They said yes that course is not recognised by them anymore if you wanted to join there scheme.
Obviously laws not changed so still valid in that sense if you come across something.
Without wanting to offend, perhaps the course would be good for you as it does cover the array of ammunition and both firearms and shotguns for dispatch. I don’t know the actual numbers but the vast majority of put downs in Hampshire are with a shotgun, with experience and a selection of cartridges it is a lot of the time possible to retain the shot within the body to minimise any ricochet risk.Putting aside losing your certificate even the risk to the public if you got it wrong and say a bullet ricochet and injured someone or property or what if you delivered a shot that wasn't fatal immediately and the animal injured someone or even suffered more before expiring what is joe public going to think of you. One thing for sure is the police will wash their hands of you
Hampshire are not monopolising anything they have looked at what was available and decided it was no longer fit for purpose and have revamped it, as should be done periodically to any training material things change.Sadly this isn't the case.
Hampshire cannot monopolies in this way.
But they cannot solely use/recognise 1 provider.Without wanting to offend, perhaps the course would be good for you as it does cover the array of ammunition and both firearms and shotguns for dispatch. I don’t know the actual numbers but the vast majority of put downs in Hampshire are with a shotgun, with experience and a selection of cartridges it is a lot of the time possible to retain the shot within the body to minimise any ricochet risk.
This revamp is in part due to an incident which cause the system to be re assessed and measures carried out to improve and provide development no hand washing just joined up thinking and learning.
Hampshire are not monopolising anything they have looked at what was available and decided it was no longer fit for purpose and have revamped it, as should be done periodically to any training material things change.
You are well informed and correctWithout wanting to offend, perhaps the course would be good for you as it does cover the array of ammunition and both firearms and shotguns for dispatch. I don’t know the actual numbers but the vast majority of put downs in Hampshire are with a shotgun, with experience and a selection of cartridges it is a lot of the time possible to retain the shot within the body to minimise any ricochet risk.
This revamp is in part due to an incident which cause the system to be re assessed and measures carried out to improve and provide development no hand washing just joined up thinking and learning.
Hampshire are not monopolising anything they have looked at what was available and decided it was no longer fit for purpose and have revamped it, as should be done periodically to any training material things change.
Yes and your right to they can't recognise just one provider and I'm sure if any other organisation comes forward with a course it will be considered but don't forget doesn't matter which course provider is chosen by the candidate they would still have to be vetted and go through constabulary assessment and training before representing the constabulary as a volunteer with firearms in a public place and on our roads, So whoever the course provider is better make sure there course is fit for purpose and will prepare the candidate for any constabulary vetting and training.But they cannot solely use/recognise 1 provider.
I've not completed a HAD course so cannot comment on whether the current offerings are fit for purpose or not. What is happening to current HAD operatives, are they now no longer "qualified "?You are well informed and correct
Yes and your right to they can't recognise just one provider and I'm sure if any other organisation comes forward with a course it will be considered but don't forget doesn't matter which course provider is chosen by the candidate they would still have to be vetted and go through constabulary assessment and training before representing the constabulary as a volunteer with firearms in a public place and on our roads, So whoever the course provider is better make sure there course is fit for purpose and will prepare the candidate for any constabulary vetting and training.
Personally and this is just my thoughts on this I don't think any other organisation has the expertise and material to put together a course that ticks all the boxes at this present time.